What makes stroke rehabilitation patients complex? Clinician perspectives and the role of discharge pressure.

Journal of comorbidity Pub Date : 2016-03-04 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.15256/joc.2016.6.63
Michelle L A Nelson, Elizabeth Hanna, Stephen Hall, Michael Calvert
{"title":"What makes stroke rehabilitation patients complex? Clinician perspectives and the role of discharge pressure.","authors":"Michelle L A Nelson,&nbsp;Elizabeth Hanna,&nbsp;Stephen Hall,&nbsp;Michael Calvert","doi":"10.15256/joc.2016.6.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 80% of people who survive a stroke have on average five other conditions and a wide range of psychosocial issues. Attention to biopsychosocial issues has led to the identification of 'complex patients'. No single definition of 'patient complexity' exists; therefore, applied health researchers seek to understand 'patient complexity' as it relates to a specific clinical context.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand how 'patient complexity' is conceptualized by clinicians, and to position the findings within the existing literature on patient complexity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative descriptive approach was utilized. Twenty-three stroke rehabilitation clinicians participated in four focus groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five elements of patient complexity were identified: medical/functional issues, social determinant factors, social/family support, personal characteristics, and health system factors. Using biopsychosocial factors to identify complexity results in all patients being complex; operationalization of the definition led to the identification of systemic elements. A disconnect between acute, inpatient rehabilitation and community services was identified as a trigger for increased complexity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient complexity is not a dichotomous state. If applying existing complexity definitions, all patients are complex. This study extends the understanding by suggesting a structural element of complexity from manageable to less manageable complexity based on ability to discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":92071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comorbidity","volume":"6 2","pages":"35-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15256/joc.2016.6.63","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comorbidity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15256/joc.2016.6.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Background: Approximately 80% of people who survive a stroke have on average five other conditions and a wide range of psychosocial issues. Attention to biopsychosocial issues has led to the identification of 'complex patients'. No single definition of 'patient complexity' exists; therefore, applied health researchers seek to understand 'patient complexity' as it relates to a specific clinical context.

Objective: To understand how 'patient complexity' is conceptualized by clinicians, and to position the findings within the existing literature on patient complexity.

Methods: A qualitative descriptive approach was utilized. Twenty-three stroke rehabilitation clinicians participated in four focus groups.

Results: Five elements of patient complexity were identified: medical/functional issues, social determinant factors, social/family support, personal characteristics, and health system factors. Using biopsychosocial factors to identify complexity results in all patients being complex; operationalization of the definition led to the identification of systemic elements. A disconnect between acute, inpatient rehabilitation and community services was identified as a trigger for increased complexity.

Conclusions: Patient complexity is not a dichotomous state. If applying existing complexity definitions, all patients are complex. This study extends the understanding by suggesting a structural element of complexity from manageable to less manageable complexity based on ability to discharge.

是什么让中风康复患者变得复杂?临床医生的观点和出院压力的作用。
背景:大约80%的中风幸存者平均有五种其他疾病和广泛的社会心理问题。对生物心理社会问题的关注导致了对“复杂患者”的识别。“患者复杂性”没有单一的定义;因此,应用健康研究人员试图理解“患者复杂性”,因为它与特定的临床环境有关。目的:了解“患者复杂性”是如何被临床医生概念化的,并在现有的关于患者复杂性的文献中定位这些发现。方法:采用定性描述方法。23名中风康复临床医生参加了四个焦点小组。结果:确定了患者复杂性的五个要素:医疗/功能问题、社会决定因素、社会/家庭支持、个人特征和卫生系统因素。使用生物心理社会因素来识别复杂性导致所有患者都是复杂的;该定义的操作化导致了系统要素的识别。急性、住院康复和社区服务之间的脱节被认为是复杂性增加的诱因。结论:患者复杂性不是一种二元状态。如果应用现有的复杂性定义,所有患者都是复杂的。本研究通过提出基于释放能力的复杂性的结构元素从可管理的复杂性到不可管理的复杂性来扩展理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信