[ATTITUDES AND KNOWLEDGE OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS ABOUT IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME].

Q4 Medicine
Acta Medica Croatica Pub Date : 2015-11-01
I Kelava, V Karabeg, S Stojanović Špehar
{"title":"[ATTITUDES AND KNOWLEDGE OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS ABOUT IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME].","authors":"I Kelava,&nbsp;V Karabeg,&nbsp;S Stojanović Špehar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diagnosing irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is often a problem for general practitioners (GPs) because they rely on symptoms\nwithout specific biological markers. The objective was to examine the attitudes and knowledge of GPs in identifying and treating\npatients with IBS. The study included 51 GPs who take care of 87,000 patients, approximately 1,530 of them with IBS, on the\nbasis of a questionnaire developed for this study in two health centers in Zagreb. The questionnaire contained questions with a\ncase vignette on GP attitudes and knowledge about IBS. In comparison with other pain conditions, GPs were found to have least\nconfidence and pleasure, while spending a lot of time and finding it most difficult to diagnose and treat patients suffering from\nIBS. In the case vignette, GPs answered correctly that it was IBS (84%) and most of them would give dietary advice and follow\nup the patient (67%). For the diagnosis of IBS, most physicians considered necessary to take diagnostic criteria into account,\nexclude alarming symptoms and do basic laboratory tests (39%). Most GPs considered IBS to be a functional bowel disorder\n(92%), 63% used diagnostic criteria for IBS, and 61% were familiar with the Rome III criteria for IBS. Gastroenterologists would be\nconsulted by 53% of GPs in case of uncertain diagnosis and 35% of GPs for therapeutic inefficiency. In the treatment of IBS, most\nGPs (51%) prescribe pharmacotherapy for functional bowel disorders. The authors conclude that GPs showed great knowledge\nin recognizing and diagnosing IBS, but compared to other painful conditions they have little self-confidence and pleasure. They\nspend a lot of time and find it most difficult to diagnose and treat patients suffering from IBS. Additional education is needed with\na more proactive approach in the form of workshops, which may bring change in their attitudes and improve their knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":35756,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Croatica","volume":"69 4","pages":"245-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Croatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diagnosing irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is often a problem for general practitioners (GPs) because they rely on symptoms without specific biological markers. The objective was to examine the attitudes and knowledge of GPs in identifying and treating patients with IBS. The study included 51 GPs who take care of 87,000 patients, approximately 1,530 of them with IBS, on the basis of a questionnaire developed for this study in two health centers in Zagreb. The questionnaire contained questions with a case vignette on GP attitudes and knowledge about IBS. In comparison with other pain conditions, GPs were found to have least confidence and pleasure, while spending a lot of time and finding it most difficult to diagnose and treat patients suffering from IBS. In the case vignette, GPs answered correctly that it was IBS (84%) and most of them would give dietary advice and follow up the patient (67%). For the diagnosis of IBS, most physicians considered necessary to take diagnostic criteria into account, exclude alarming symptoms and do basic laboratory tests (39%). Most GPs considered IBS to be a functional bowel disorder (92%), 63% used diagnostic criteria for IBS, and 61% were familiar with the Rome III criteria for IBS. Gastroenterologists would be consulted by 53% of GPs in case of uncertain diagnosis and 35% of GPs for therapeutic inefficiency. In the treatment of IBS, most GPs (51%) prescribe pharmacotherapy for functional bowel disorders. The authors conclude that GPs showed great knowledge in recognizing and diagnosing IBS, but compared to other painful conditions they have little self-confidence and pleasure. They spend a lot of time and find it most difficult to diagnose and treat patients suffering from IBS. Additional education is needed with a more proactive approach in the form of workshops, which may bring change in their attitudes and improve their knowledge.

全科医生对肠易激综合征的态度和知识。
诊断肠易激综合征(IBS)对全科医生(gp)来说通常是一个问题,因为他们依赖于没有特定生物标记的症状。目的是调查全科医生在识别和治疗肠易激综合征患者方面的态度和知识。这项研究包括51名全科医生,他们照顾了87,000名患者,其中约有1,530名患有肠易激综合征,根据萨格勒布两家卫生中心为这项研究开发的问卷调查。问卷包含了关于全科医生对肠易激综合症的态度和知识的案例小短文。与其他疼痛状况相比,全科医生最缺乏信心和快乐,同时花费大量时间,发现诊断和治疗患有bs的患者最困难。在病例简介中,全科医生正确地回答了这是肠易激综合征(84%),他们中的大多数人会给出饮食建议并随访患者(67%)。对于肠易激综合征的诊断,大多数医生认为有必要考虑诊断标准,排除警报症状并进行基本的实验室检查(39%)。大多数全科医生认为肠易激综合征是一种功能性肠紊乱(92%),63%使用肠易激综合征的诊断标准,61%熟悉肠易激综合征的Rome III标准。53%的全科医生会在诊断不确定的情况下咨询胃肠科医生,35%的全科医生会在治疗效率低下的情况下咨询胃肠科医生。在肠易激综合征的治疗中,大多数全科医生(51%)为功能性肠病开药物治疗。作者得出结论,全科医生在识别和诊断肠易激综合征方面表现出了很高的知识,但与其他痛苦的疾病相比,他们缺乏自信和快乐。他们花费了大量的时间,发现诊断和治疗肠易激综合症患者是最困难的。需要以讲习班的形式采取更积极主动的方式进行额外教育,这可能会改变他们的态度并提高他们的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Medica Croatica
Acta Medica Croatica Medicine-Medicine (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: ACTA MEDICA CROATICA publishes original contributions to medical sciences, that have not been previously published. All manuscripts should be written in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信