Bertil Friberg, Michael Hana, Haidar Rasoul Mahdi, Torsten Jemt
{"title":"Clinical and radiographic outcomes of lateral sinus floor elevation: a retrospective study.","authors":"Bertil Friberg, Michael Hana, Haidar Rasoul Mahdi, Torsten Jemt","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of lateral sinus floor elevation (LSFE). A total of 347 medium rough surface implants were placed in both xenogenic bone and natural bone in 103 patients. A two-stage surgical technique was performed with a lateral window approach followed by a healing period of 9 months prior to implant placement. Patients were analysed with regard to pre- and post-augmentation bone height data (Group A), levels of mar- ginal bone (Group B) and implant survival rates/complications. A total of 6 implants were lost in the present investigation, of which two were still osseoin- tegrated, albeit mechanically damaged.The implant survival rate was 99.0% considering those engaging BioOss, and the corresponding figure for implants placed in natural bone was 96.2%. The average follow-up time was 2.5 years.The mean preoperative bone height was 3.8 mm and the mean postoperative bone height was 13.7 mm. It may be advocated that preoperative bone heights exceeding 7 mm are not indicative of LSFE treatment and that preoperative bone heights of 4-7 mm may imply alternative treatment options. A group of subjects, corresponding to 16.5%- of the patient material, had some sort of postoperative complication. One may conclude that LSFE is a predictable and safe treatment procedure, with a high implant survival rate. LSFE resulted in gained bone height in the range of 10 mm.</p>","PeriodicalId":22114,"journal":{"name":"Swedish dental journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swedish dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of lateral sinus floor elevation (LSFE). A total of 347 medium rough surface implants were placed in both xenogenic bone and natural bone in 103 patients. A two-stage surgical technique was performed with a lateral window approach followed by a healing period of 9 months prior to implant placement. Patients were analysed with regard to pre- and post-augmentation bone height data (Group A), levels of mar- ginal bone (Group B) and implant survival rates/complications. A total of 6 implants were lost in the present investigation, of which two were still osseoin- tegrated, albeit mechanically damaged.The implant survival rate was 99.0% considering those engaging BioOss, and the corresponding figure for implants placed in natural bone was 96.2%. The average follow-up time was 2.5 years.The mean preoperative bone height was 3.8 mm and the mean postoperative bone height was 13.7 mm. It may be advocated that preoperative bone heights exceeding 7 mm are not indicative of LSFE treatment and that preoperative bone heights of 4-7 mm may imply alternative treatment options. A group of subjects, corresponding to 16.5%- of the patient material, had some sort of postoperative complication. One may conclude that LSFE is a predictable and safe treatment procedure, with a high implant survival rate. LSFE resulted in gained bone height in the range of 10 mm.
期刊介绍:
Swedish Dental Journal is the scientific journal of the Swedish Dental Association and the Swedish Dental Society. It is published 4 times a year to promote practice, education and research within odontology. Manuscripts containing original research are accepted for consideraion if neither the article nor any part of its essential substance has been or will be published elsewhere. Reviews, Case Reports and Short Communications will also be considered for publication.