Combination Effect of Hemostatic and Disinfecting Agents on Micro-leakage of Restorations Bonded with Different Bonding Systems.

Journal of Dental Biomaterial Pub Date : 2016-09-01
Farhadpour H, Sharafeddin F, Akbarian Sc, Azarian B
{"title":"Combination Effect of Hemostatic and Disinfecting Agents on Micro-leakage of Restorations Bonded with Different Bonding Systems.","authors":"Farhadpour H,&nbsp;Sharafeddin F,&nbsp;Akbarian Sc,&nbsp;Azarian B","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Hemostatic agents may affect the micro-leakage of different adhesive systems. Also, chlorhexidine has shown positive effects on micro-leakage. However, their interaction effect has not been reported yet.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effect of contamination with a hemostatic agent on micro-leakage of total- and self-etching adhesive systems and the effect of chlorhexidine application after the removal of the hemostatic agent.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Standardized Class V cavity was prepared on each of the sixty caries free premolars at the cemento-enamel junction, with the occlusal margin located in enamel and the gingival margin in dentin. Then, the specimens were randomly divided into 6 groups (n = 10) according to hemostatic agent (H) contamination, chlorhexidine (CHX) application, and the type of adhesive systems (Adper Single Bond and Clearfil SE Bond) used. After filling the cavities with resin composite, the root apices were sealed with utility wax. Furthermore, all the surfaces, except for the restorations and 1mm from the margins, were covered with two layers of nail varnish. The teeth were immersed in a 0.5% basic fuschin dye for 24 hours, rinsed, blot-dried and sectioned longitudinally through the center of the restorations bucco- lingualy. The sections were examined using a stereomicroscope and the extension of dye penetration was analyzed according to a non-parametric scale from 0 to 3. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While ASB group showed no micro-leakage in enamel, none of the groups showed complete elimination of micro-leakage from the dentin. Regarding micro-leakage at enamel, and dentin margins, there was no significant difference between groups 1 and 2, 1 and 3, and 2 and 3 (<i>p</i> > 0.05). A significantly lower micro-leakage at the enamel and dentin margins was observed in group 3, compared to group 6. No significant difference was observed between groups 4 and 5 in enamel (<i>p</i> = 0.35) and dentin (<i>p</i> = 0.34). Group 6 showed significantly higher micro-leakage, compared to group 4 and 5 (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hemostatic agent contamination had no significant effect on micro-leakage of total- and self-etching adhesive systems. Application of chlorhexidine after the removal of hemostatic agent increased micro-leakage in self-etching adhesives but did not affect when total-etching was used.</p>","PeriodicalId":53341,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Biomaterial","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1c/86/JDB-3-292.PMC5608065.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Biomaterial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem: Hemostatic agents may affect the micro-leakage of different adhesive systems. Also, chlorhexidine has shown positive effects on micro-leakage. However, their interaction effect has not been reported yet.

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of contamination with a hemostatic agent on micro-leakage of total- and self-etching adhesive systems and the effect of chlorhexidine application after the removal of the hemostatic agent.

Materials and methods: Standardized Class V cavity was prepared on each of the sixty caries free premolars at the cemento-enamel junction, with the occlusal margin located in enamel and the gingival margin in dentin. Then, the specimens were randomly divided into 6 groups (n = 10) according to hemostatic agent (H) contamination, chlorhexidine (CHX) application, and the type of adhesive systems (Adper Single Bond and Clearfil SE Bond) used. After filling the cavities with resin composite, the root apices were sealed with utility wax. Furthermore, all the surfaces, except for the restorations and 1mm from the margins, were covered with two layers of nail varnish. The teeth were immersed in a 0.5% basic fuschin dye for 24 hours, rinsed, blot-dried and sectioned longitudinally through the center of the restorations bucco- lingualy. The sections were examined using a stereomicroscope and the extension of dye penetration was analyzed according to a non-parametric scale from 0 to 3. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U-test.

Results: While ASB group showed no micro-leakage in enamel, none of the groups showed complete elimination of micro-leakage from the dentin. Regarding micro-leakage at enamel, and dentin margins, there was no significant difference between groups 1 and 2, 1 and 3, and 2 and 3 (p > 0.05). A significantly lower micro-leakage at the enamel and dentin margins was observed in group 3, compared to group 6. No significant difference was observed between groups 4 and 5 in enamel (p = 0.35) and dentin (p = 0.34). Group 6 showed significantly higher micro-leakage, compared to group 4 and 5 (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Hemostatic agent contamination had no significant effect on micro-leakage of total- and self-etching adhesive systems. Application of chlorhexidine after the removal of hemostatic agent increased micro-leakage in self-etching adhesives but did not affect when total-etching was used.

止血消毒剂联合使用对不同粘结体系修复体微渗漏的影响。
问题陈述:止血剂可能影响不同粘接剂系统的微渗漏。氯己定对微泄漏也有积极的抑制作用。然而,它们的相互作用尚未见报道。目的:评价一种止血剂污染对全蚀刻和自蚀刻胶粘剂系统微渗漏的影响,以及去除止血剂后使用氯己定的效果。材料与方法:60颗无龋前磨牙在牙釉质-牙釉质交界处各制备标准化V类牙槽,牙合缘位于牙釉质内,龈缘位于牙本质内。然后,根据止血剂(H)污染程度、氯己定(CHX)应用情况、粘接剂类型(Adper Single Bond和Clearfil SE Bond),将标本随机分为6组(n = 10)。用树脂复合材料充填牙槽后,用通用蜡封住根尖。此外,除了修复体和距离边缘1mm的地方,所有的表面都覆盖了两层指甲油。将牙齿浸泡在0.5%碱性胭脂染料中24小时,冲洗,斑点干燥,并通过口腔-舌侧修复体的中心纵向切片。用体视显微镜检查切片,并根据0到3的非参数尺度分析染料渗透的扩展。统计学分析采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney u检验。结果:ASB组无牙釉质微渗漏,但两组均未完全消除牙本质微渗漏。1组与2组、1组与3组、2组与3组牙本质边缘微渗漏比较,差异均无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。与6组相比,3组牙釉质和牙本质边缘微渗漏明显减少。第4组和第5组在牙本质(p = 0.34)和牙釉质(p = 0.35)方面差异无统计学意义。6组微渗漏明显高于4、5组(p < 0.05)。结论:止血剂污染对全刻蚀和自刻蚀胶粘剂系统的微渗漏无显著影响。去除止血剂后使用氯己定增加了自蚀刻粘接剂的微漏,但对全蚀刻粘接剂的微漏无影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信