Marginal Micro-leakage of Self-etch and All-in One Adhesives to Primary Teeth, with Mechanical or Chemo-Mechanical Caries Removal.

Journal of Dental Biomaterial Pub Date : 2016-06-01
Nouzari A, Zohrei A, Ferooz M, Mohammadi N
{"title":"Marginal Micro-leakage of Self-etch and All-in One Adhesives to Primary Teeth, with Mechanical or Chemo-Mechanical Caries Removal.","authors":"Nouzari A,&nbsp;Zohrei A,&nbsp;Ferooz M,&nbsp;Mohammadi N","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Chemo-mechanical caries removal is an effective alternative to the traditional rotary drilling method. One of the factors that can influence micro-leakage is the method of caries removal.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the micro-leakage of resin composite in primary dentition using self-etch and all-in one adhesives following conventional and chemo-mechanical caries removal.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty extracted human primary anterior teeth with class III carious lesions were collected. The selected teeth were divided randomly into two groups each consisting of 30 teeth. In group1 carious lesions were removed using Carisolv multi mix gel. In group 2, caries was removed using round steel burs in a slow-speed hand piece. Then, the specimens in each group were randomly divided into two subgroups (A and B) of 15 and treated by either Clearfil SE Bond (CSEB) or Scotch bond. All prepared cavities were filled with a resin composite (Estellite). All the specimens were stored in distilled water at 37ºC for 24 hours and then thermocycled in 5ºC and 55ºC water with a dwell time of 20 seconds for 1500 cycles. The specimens were immersed in 1% methylene blue solution for 24 hours, removed, washed and sectioned mesiodistally. The sectioned splits were examined under a stereomicroscope to determine the micro-leakage scores. The data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis Test in SPSS version 21.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between micro-leakage scores among the four groups (<i>p</i> = 0.127). Score 0 of micro-leakage was detected for 60% of the specimens in group 1-A (Carisolv + CSEB), 73% of the group 2-A (hand piece + CSEB), 80% of the group 1-B (Carisolv + Scotch bond), and 93% of the group 2-B in which caries was removed using hand piece and bonded with Scotch bond .</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although caries removal using hand piece bur along with using Scotch bond adhesive performed less micro-leakage, it would seems that the use of Carisolv doesn't adversely affect the micro-leakage of composite restorations while using self-etch or all-in one adhesives.</p>","PeriodicalId":53341,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Biomaterial","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bd/7b/JDB-3-220.PMC5608055.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Biomaterial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem: Chemo-mechanical caries removal is an effective alternative to the traditional rotary drilling method. One of the factors that can influence micro-leakage is the method of caries removal.

Objectives: To compare the micro-leakage of resin composite in primary dentition using self-etch and all-in one adhesives following conventional and chemo-mechanical caries removal.

Materials and methods: Sixty extracted human primary anterior teeth with class III carious lesions were collected. The selected teeth were divided randomly into two groups each consisting of 30 teeth. In group1 carious lesions were removed using Carisolv multi mix gel. In group 2, caries was removed using round steel burs in a slow-speed hand piece. Then, the specimens in each group were randomly divided into two subgroups (A and B) of 15 and treated by either Clearfil SE Bond (CSEB) or Scotch bond. All prepared cavities were filled with a resin composite (Estellite). All the specimens were stored in distilled water at 37ºC for 24 hours and then thermocycled in 5ºC and 55ºC water with a dwell time of 20 seconds for 1500 cycles. The specimens were immersed in 1% methylene blue solution for 24 hours, removed, washed and sectioned mesiodistally. The sectioned splits were examined under a stereomicroscope to determine the micro-leakage scores. The data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis Test in SPSS version 21.

Results: There were no significant differences between micro-leakage scores among the four groups (p = 0.127). Score 0 of micro-leakage was detected for 60% of the specimens in group 1-A (Carisolv + CSEB), 73% of the group 2-A (hand piece + CSEB), 80% of the group 1-B (Carisolv + Scotch bond), and 93% of the group 2-B in which caries was removed using hand piece and bonded with Scotch bond .

Conclusions: Although caries removal using hand piece bur along with using Scotch bond adhesive performed less micro-leakage, it would seems that the use of Carisolv doesn't adversely affect the micro-leakage of composite restorations while using self-etch or all-in one adhesives.

Abstract Image

机械或化学-机械除龋时,自蚀和一体化胶粘剂对乳牙的边缘微泄漏。
问题说明:化学机械除龋是传统旋转钻井方法的有效替代方案。影响微漏的因素之一是除龋方法。目的:比较树脂复合材料自蚀刻与全合一粘接剂在常规和化学机械除龋术后的微渗漏情况。材料与方法:收集拔除的III类龋齿人前牙60颗。选择的牙齿随机分为两组,每组30颗牙齿。第1组采用Carisolv多混凝胶去除龋齿病变。在第二组中,用慢速手片中的圆钢毛刺去除龋。然后,将每组标本随机分为A、B两个亚组,每组15只,分别用Clearfil SE Bond (CSEB)或Scotch Bond处理。所有制备的空腔都用树脂复合材料(Estellite)填充。所有标本在37ºC蒸馏水中保存24小时,然后在5ºC和55ºC水中热循环,停留时间为20秒,循环1500次。标本在1%亚甲蓝溶液中浸泡24小时,取出,清洗,中端切片。在体视显微镜下检查切片裂口以确定微泄漏评分。采用SPSS 21版的Kruskal-Wallis检验对数据进行分析。结果:四组间微渗漏评分差异无统计学意义(p = 0.127)。1-A组(Carisolv + CSEB) 60%、2-A组(Carisolv + CSEB) 73%、1-B组(Carisolv + Scotch bond) 80%、2-B组(Carisolv + Scotch bond) 93%的标本出现微渗漏。虽然使用手片和Scotch粘接剂去除龋的微渗漏较少,但使用Carisolv似乎不会对自蚀刻或一体化粘接剂的复合修复体的微渗漏产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信