16S rRNA deep sequencing identifies Actinotignum schaalii as the major component of a polymicrobial intra-abdominal infection and implicates a urinary source.

JMM case reports Pub Date : 2017-05-03 eCollection Date: 2017-05-01 DOI:10.1099/jmmcr.0.005091
Andrew Bryan, Lindsey M Kirkpatrick, John J Manaloor, Stephen J Salipante
{"title":"16S rRNA deep sequencing identifies <i>Actinotignum schaalii</i> as the major component of a polymicrobial intra-abdominal infection and implicates a urinary source.","authors":"Andrew Bryan,&nbsp;Lindsey M Kirkpatrick,&nbsp;John J Manaloor,&nbsp;Stephen J Salipante","doi":"10.1099/jmmcr.0.005091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. It can be difficult to catalogue the individual organisms comprising polymicrobial patient infections, both because conventional clinical microbiological culture does not facilitate the isolation and enumeration of all members of a complex microbial community, and because fastidious organisms may be mixed with organisms that grow rapidly in vitro. Empiric antimicrobial treatment is frequently employed based on the anatomical site and the suspected source of the infection, especially when an appropriately collected surgical specimen is not obtained. Case presentation. We present a case of an intra-abdominal infection in a patient with complex anatomy and recurrent urinary tract infections. Imaging did not reveal a clear source of infection, no growth was obtained from urine cultures and initial abdominal fluid cultures were also negative. In contrast, 16S rRNA deep sequencing of abdominal fluid samples revealed mixed bacterial populations with abundant anaerobes, including Actinotignum schaalii (Actinobaculum schaalii). Ultimately, only Enterobacter cloacae complex and meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, both of which were identified by sequencing, were recovered by culture. Conclusion. The clinical application of 16S rRNA deep sequencing can more comprehensively and accurately define the organisms present in an individual patient's polymicrobial infection than conventional microbiological culture, detecting species that are not recovered under standard culture conditions or that are otherwise unexpected. These results can facilitate effective antimicrobial stewardship and help elucidate the possible origins of infections.","PeriodicalId":73559,"journal":{"name":"JMM case reports","volume":"4 5","pages":"e005091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630961/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMM case reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmmcr.0.005091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction. It can be difficult to catalogue the individual organisms comprising polymicrobial patient infections, both because conventional clinical microbiological culture does not facilitate the isolation and enumeration of all members of a complex microbial community, and because fastidious organisms may be mixed with organisms that grow rapidly in vitro. Empiric antimicrobial treatment is frequently employed based on the anatomical site and the suspected source of the infection, especially when an appropriately collected surgical specimen is not obtained. Case presentation. We present a case of an intra-abdominal infection in a patient with complex anatomy and recurrent urinary tract infections. Imaging did not reveal a clear source of infection, no growth was obtained from urine cultures and initial abdominal fluid cultures were also negative. In contrast, 16S rRNA deep sequencing of abdominal fluid samples revealed mixed bacterial populations with abundant anaerobes, including Actinotignum schaalii (Actinobaculum schaalii). Ultimately, only Enterobacter cloacae complex and meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, both of which were identified by sequencing, were recovered by culture. Conclusion. The clinical application of 16S rRNA deep sequencing can more comprehensively and accurately define the organisms present in an individual patient's polymicrobial infection than conventional microbiological culture, detecting species that are not recovered under standard culture conditions or that are otherwise unexpected. These results can facilitate effective antimicrobial stewardship and help elucidate the possible origins of infections.
16S rRNA深度测序鉴定沙利放线菌是多微生物腹腔感染的主要成分,并暗示其泌尿源。
介绍。对构成多微生物患者感染的单个微生物进行分类可能是困难的,一方面是因为常规的临床微生物培养不便于分离和枚举复杂微生物群落的所有成员,另一方面是因为挑剔的微生物可能与体外快速生长的微生物混合在一起。经验性抗菌治疗通常基于解剖部位和疑似感染源,特别是在没有获得适当收集的手术标本的情况下。案例演示。我们提出一个病例腹腔内感染的病人复杂的解剖结构和反复尿路感染。成像未显示明确的感染来源,尿液培养未见生长,最初的腹部液体培养也为阴性。相比之下,腹部液体样本的16S rRNA深度测序显示混合细菌群中有丰富的厌氧菌,包括沙利放线菌(Actinotignum schaalii)。最终,只有阴沟肠杆菌复合菌和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌通过培养恢复,这两种细菌都是通过测序鉴定的。结论。临床应用16S rRNA深度测序可以比常规微生物培养更全面、准确地确定单个患者多微生物感染中存在的微生物,检测出在标准培养条件下无法恢复的物种或其他意想不到的物种。这些结果可以促进有效的抗菌药物管理,并有助于阐明可能的感染来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信