Put more trust in the trustworthy and less in the untrustworthy to improve judgement of medicines.

{"title":"Put more trust in the trustworthy and less in the untrustworthy to improve judgement of medicines.","authors":"","doi":"10.1136/bmj.j4446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An editorial error changed the meaning in this letter “Put more trust in the trustworthy and less in the untrustworthy to improve judgement of medicines” by Mary Madden (BMJ 2017;358:j4202, doi:10.1136/bmj.j4202). The penultimate sentence should have read, “Pervasive use of a ‘deficit model,’ which implies that all public and professional scepticism of science is unfounded and that corrective communication by experts is necessary, is unhelpful” [not “Pervasive discussion of the ‘deficit model,’ which implies that all public and professional scepticism of science is unfounded and that corrective communication by experts is necessary, is unhelpful,” as published].","PeriodicalId":93911,"journal":{"name":"BMJ (Clinical research ed.)","volume":"358 ","pages":"j4446"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmj.j4446","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ (Clinical research ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An editorial error changed the meaning in this letter “Put more trust in the trustworthy and less in the untrustworthy to improve judgement of medicines” by Mary Madden (BMJ 2017;358:j4202, doi:10.1136/bmj.j4202). The penultimate sentence should have read, “Pervasive use of a ‘deficit model,’ which implies that all public and professional scepticism of science is unfounded and that corrective communication by experts is necessary, is unhelpful” [not “Pervasive discussion of the ‘deficit model,’ which implies that all public and professional scepticism of science is unfounded and that corrective communication by experts is necessary, is unhelpful,” as published].
多信任可信的,少信任不可信的,提高对药品的判断能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信