Magnetic Resonance-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound in the presence of biopsy markers.

Journal of therapeutic ultrasound Pub Date : 2017-09-20 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40349-017-0103-1
Charles Mougenot, Chrit Moonen
{"title":"Magnetic Resonance-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound in the presence of biopsy markers.","authors":"Charles Mougenot,&nbsp;Chrit Moonen","doi":"10.1186/s40349-017-0103-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic Resonance guided High Intensity Focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) offers precise non-invasive thermotherapy for clinical applications such as the treatment of breast lesions. However, patients with a biopsy marker are usually not eligible for MR-HIFU treatment. This study investigates the interaction of some MR-compatible markers with MR-HIFU thermotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MR-HIFU compatibility of 14 markers (6 Gold Anchor and 4 Visicoil markers in gold, 1 Visicoil marker in brass, 3 BiomarC markers in carbon coated) were tested using the Sonalleve breast MR-HIFU platform at 1.5 T. The impact of these markers was assessed by counting the number of voxels with low signal intensity on MR thermal maps and by comparing temperature increases induced by the HIFU beam.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most markers were visible on thermal maps with an apparent size 4.2 ± 3.1 and 2 ± 1.8 times larger than their respective actual width and length. The volume of masked voxels was for most of the markers much larger than the actual volume of the marker (up to a factor 65.1). However, it represents only a small fraction of the 12 mm diameter targeted region (up to 8.8 voxels which represents 19% of this targeted region). Some differences in the maximal temperature increase were observed especially for BiomarC 1 × 3 and BiomarC 2 × 4 markers enhancing the heating. These differences were less pronounced at the edge of the targeted region.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All markers had a minimal impact on the volume above the thermal dose threshold of 240 EM since the differences measured were smaller than the in-plane image resolution of 1.56 mm.</p>","PeriodicalId":90245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of therapeutic ultrasound","volume":"5 ","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40349-017-0103-1","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of therapeutic ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40349-017-0103-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Magnetic Resonance guided High Intensity Focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) offers precise non-invasive thermotherapy for clinical applications such as the treatment of breast lesions. However, patients with a biopsy marker are usually not eligible for MR-HIFU treatment. This study investigates the interaction of some MR-compatible markers with MR-HIFU thermotherapy.

Methods: The MR-HIFU compatibility of 14 markers (6 Gold Anchor and 4 Visicoil markers in gold, 1 Visicoil marker in brass, 3 BiomarC markers in carbon coated) were tested using the Sonalleve breast MR-HIFU platform at 1.5 T. The impact of these markers was assessed by counting the number of voxels with low signal intensity on MR thermal maps and by comparing temperature increases induced by the HIFU beam.

Results: Most markers were visible on thermal maps with an apparent size 4.2 ± 3.1 and 2 ± 1.8 times larger than their respective actual width and length. The volume of masked voxels was for most of the markers much larger than the actual volume of the marker (up to a factor 65.1). However, it represents only a small fraction of the 12 mm diameter targeted region (up to 8.8 voxels which represents 19% of this targeted region). Some differences in the maximal temperature increase were observed especially for BiomarC 1 × 3 and BiomarC 2 × 4 markers enhancing the heating. These differences were less pronounced at the edge of the targeted region.

Conclusion: All markers had a minimal impact on the volume above the thermal dose threshold of 240 EM since the differences measured were smaller than the in-plane image resolution of 1.56 mm.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

磁共振引导的高强度聚焦超声在活检标志物的存在。
背景:磁共振引导的高强度聚焦超声(MR-HIFU)为临床应用提供了精确的非侵入性热疗法,如乳腺病变的治疗。然而,有活检标记的患者通常不适合MR-HIFU治疗。本研究探讨了一些核磁共振兼容标记物与高磁共振超声热疗的相互作用。方法:使用Sonalleve乳腺MR-HIFU平台在1.5 t下测试14个标记物(6个Gold Anchor和4个Visicoil标记物,1个Visicoil标记物,1个Visicoil标记物,3个碳包覆的BiomarC标记物)的MR-HIFU相容性,通过计算MR热图上低信号强度的体素数和比较HIFU束引起的温度升高来评估这些标记物的影响。结果:大多数标记物在热图上可见,其表观尺寸分别是其实际宽度和长度的4.2±3.1倍和2±1.8倍。对于大多数标记来说,被屏蔽体素的体积比标记的实际体积大得多(高达65.1倍)。然而,它只代表了12毫米直径目标区域的一小部分(高达8.8体素,代表了该目标区域的19%)。生物标记1 × 3和生物标记2 × 4的最大升温幅度有所不同。这些差异在目标区域的边缘不太明显。结论:所有标记物对240 EM热剂量阈值以上的体积影响最小,测量的差异小于1.56 mm的平面内图像分辨率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信