Treating symptomatic uterine fibroids with myomectomy: current practice and views of UK consultants.

Q2 Medicine
Gynecological Surgery Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-07-06 DOI:10.1186/s10397-017-1014-4
R Fusun Sirkeci, Anna Maria Belli, Isaac T Manyonda
{"title":"Treating symptomatic uterine fibroids with myomectomy: current practice and views of UK consultants.","authors":"R Fusun Sirkeci,&nbsp;Anna Maria Belli,&nbsp;Isaac T Manyonda","doi":"10.1186/s10397-017-1014-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The demand for uterus-sparing treatments is increasing as more women postpone childbirth to their 30-40s, when fibroids are more symptomatic. With an increasing choice of treatment options and changing care-provider profiles, now is an opportune time to survey current practices and opinions. Using a 25-stem questionnaire, a web-based survey was used to capture the practices and opinions of UK consultant gynecologists on the treatment of symptomatic fibroids, including the types of procedure most frequently used, methods used to reduce blood loss, and awareness and acceptability of treatment options, and to assess the impact of gender and experience of the treating gynecologist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 22%. Laparascopic myomectomy is used least frequently, with 80% of the respondents using GnRHa preoperatively to minimize blood loss and correct anemia, while vasopressin is most frequently used to reduce intraoperative blood loss. Female consultants operate significantly less frequently than males. Those with more than 10 years consultant experience are more likely to perform an open myomectomy compared to those with less than 10 years experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to a similar survey performed 10 years ago, surgical methods remain to be the most common treatments, but use of less invasive treatments such as UAE has increased. Consultants' attitudes appear to be responding to the patient demand for less radical treatments. However, it is yet to be seen if the changing consultant demographics will keep up with this demand. The low response rate warrants cautious interpretation of the results, but they provide an interesting snapshot of current views and practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":46311,"journal":{"name":"Gynecological Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s10397-017-1014-4","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10397-017-1014-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Background: The demand for uterus-sparing treatments is increasing as more women postpone childbirth to their 30-40s, when fibroids are more symptomatic. With an increasing choice of treatment options and changing care-provider profiles, now is an opportune time to survey current practices and opinions. Using a 25-stem questionnaire, a web-based survey was used to capture the practices and opinions of UK consultant gynecologists on the treatment of symptomatic fibroids, including the types of procedure most frequently used, methods used to reduce blood loss, and awareness and acceptability of treatment options, and to assess the impact of gender and experience of the treating gynecologist.

Results: The response rate was 22%. Laparascopic myomectomy is used least frequently, with 80% of the respondents using GnRHa preoperatively to minimize blood loss and correct anemia, while vasopressin is most frequently used to reduce intraoperative blood loss. Female consultants operate significantly less frequently than males. Those with more than 10 years consultant experience are more likely to perform an open myomectomy compared to those with less than 10 years experience.

Conclusions: Compared to a similar survey performed 10 years ago, surgical methods remain to be the most common treatments, but use of less invasive treatments such as UAE has increased. Consultants' attitudes appear to be responding to the patient demand for less radical treatments. However, it is yet to be seen if the changing consultant demographics will keep up with this demand. The low response rate warrants cautious interpretation of the results, but they provide an interesting snapshot of current views and practices.

治疗症状性子宫肌瘤与子宫肌瘤切除术:目前的做法和意见的英国顾问。
背景:随着越来越多的妇女将生育推迟到30-40岁,当子宫肌瘤更有症状时,对保留子宫治疗的需求正在增加。随着治疗方案选择的增加和护理提供者概况的改变,现在是调查当前做法和意见的好时机。一项基于网络的调查使用了25项问卷,以获取英国妇科顾问医生在治疗症状性肌瘤方面的实践和意见,包括最常用的手术类型、减少失血的方法、治疗方案的认识和可接受性,并评估性别和治疗妇科医生经验的影响。结果:有效率为22%。腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的使用频率最低,80%的受访者术前使用GnRHa来减少失血和纠正贫血,而血管加压素最常用于减少术中失血。女性顾问的工作频率明显低于男性。与经验不足10年的人相比,拥有10年以上咨询经验的人更有可能进行开放式子宫肌瘤切除术。结论:与10年前进行的类似调查相比,手术方法仍然是最常见的治疗方法,但使用较少侵入性的治疗方法(如UAE)有所增加。咨询师的态度似乎在回应患者对不那么激进的治疗方法的要求。然而,不断变化的顾问人口结构是否能跟上这一需求还有待观察。低回复率保证了对结果的谨慎解释,但它们提供了当前观点和实践的有趣快照。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: "Gynecological Surgery", founded in 2004, is the first and premier peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to all aspects of research, development, and training in gynecological surgery. This field is rapidly changing in response to new developments and innovations in endoscopy, robotics, imaging and other interventional procedures. Gynecological surgery is also expanding and now encompasses all surgical interventions pertaining to women health, including oncology, urogynecology and fetal surgery. The Journal publishes Original Research, Reviews, Evidence-based Viewpoints on clinical protocols and procedures, Editorials, Perspectives, Communications and Case Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信