Treatment of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with diabetic neuropathy using low level laser therapy versus ultrasound controlled comparative study

Osama F. Ahmed , Ahmed M. Elkharbotly , Nahed Taha , Ahmed B. Bekheet
{"title":"Treatment of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with diabetic neuropathy using low level laser therapy versus ultrasound controlled comparative study","authors":"Osama F. Ahmed ,&nbsp;Ahmed M. Elkharbotly ,&nbsp;Nahed Taha ,&nbsp;Ahmed B. Bekheet","doi":"10.1016/j.bbacli.2017.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare between Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) and Ultrasound (US) in treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) using the advantage of application of treatment directly over the transverse carpal ligament, as well as over the course of the median nerve in the forearm simultaneously.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Fifty patients (25–55<!--> <!-->years) with diabetic neuropathy, diagnosed as unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome participated in the study. They were equally divided and randomly assigned into two groups; each group consisted of 25 patients.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Patients in group (A) received a program of IR Gallium Arsenide LLLT (wavelength 904<!--> <!-->nm, average power 20<!--> <!-->mW, laser probe 7<!--> <!-->mm diameter), with a total application of 4.8<!--> <!-->J, while patients in group (B) received a program of US (frequency 1<!--> <!-->MHz, power 1.0<!--> <!-->W/cm<sup>2</sup>, pulsed mode 1:5).</p></div><div><h3>Results &amp; discussion</h3><p>The results of our study showed that there were no statistical significance differences (<em>P</em> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->0.05) were observed between the two groups. It was concluded that both low level laser (20<!--> <!-->mW power, 904<!--> <!-->nm Wavelength) and ultrasound (1.0<!--> <!-->w/cm<sup>2</sup> power, 1<!--> <!-->MHz frequency) are effective in the treatment of mild and moderate CTS patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72344,"journal":{"name":"BBA clinical","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 43-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bbacli.2017.07.001","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BBA clinical","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214647417300120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Aim

The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare between Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) and Ultrasound (US) in treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) using the advantage of application of treatment directly over the transverse carpal ligament, as well as over the course of the median nerve in the forearm simultaneously.

Design

Fifty patients (25–55 years) with diabetic neuropathy, diagnosed as unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome participated in the study. They were equally divided and randomly assigned into two groups; each group consisted of 25 patients.

Materials and methods

Patients in group (A) received a program of IR Gallium Arsenide LLLT (wavelength 904 nm, average power 20 mW, laser probe 7 mm diameter), with a total application of 4.8 J, while patients in group (B) received a program of US (frequency 1 MHz, power 1.0 W/cm2, pulsed mode 1:5).

Results & discussion

The results of our study showed that there were no statistical significance differences (P > 0.05) were observed between the two groups. It was concluded that both low level laser (20 mW power, 904 nm Wavelength) and ultrasound (1.0 w/cm2 power, 1 MHz frequency) are effective in the treatment of mild and moderate CTS patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

低水平激光治疗轻至中度腕管综合征糖尿病神经病变与超声对照比较研究。
目的:本研究的目的是探讨和比较低水平激光治疗(LLLT)和超声(US)治疗腕管综合征(CTS)的优势,利用直接应用治疗腕横韧带,以及同时应用治疗前臂正中神经的过程。设计:50例(25-55岁)诊断为单侧腕管综合征的糖尿病神经病变患者参与研究。他们被随机分为两组;每组25例。材料与方法:A组采用红外砷化镓LLLT方案(波长904 nm,平均功率20 mW,激光探头直径7 mm),总施用量4.8 J; B组采用US方案(频率1 MHz,功率1.0 W/cm2,脉冲模式1:5)。结果与讨论:我们的研究结果显示,两组间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:低功率激光(功率20 mW,波长904 nm)和超声(功率1.0 w/cm2,频率1 MHz)治疗轻中度CTS均有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信