A System Analysis of Delay in Outpatient Respiratory Equipment Delivery.

Sheila Kun, Gregory Placencia, Sally Davidson Ward, Thomas Keens
{"title":"A System Analysis of Delay in Outpatient Respiratory Equipment Delivery.","authors":"Sheila Kun,&nbsp;Gregory Placencia,&nbsp;Sally Davidson Ward,&nbsp;Thomas Keens","doi":"10.1891/1521-0987.17.4.161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To systematically assess barriers delaying home respiratory equipment requisition and to evaluate for temporal correlation between delays and emergency room or hospitalization episodes.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Initiation of home respiratory treatments is delayed because of delays in delivery of durable medical equipment (DME). This study assesses root causes of such delays from a system perspective. We also describe clinical consequences by measuring emergency room visits and hospitalization days for temporal correlations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of DME ordering records from April 2011 to March of 2012.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Outpatient DME records in Pediatric Pulmonary Division.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 164 available orders studied, deliveries were made as followed: 31 (19%) within 24 hr: 18 (59%) oxygen orders and 10 (32%) nebulizer orders 50 (30%) within 1 week: 25 (50%) nebulizer orders and 10 (20%) oxygen orders Delays: 45 (27%) delivered > 1 month: Bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) = 16 (36%) Oxygen = 12 (26%) Cough assist device = 7 (16%) Nebulizer = 5 (11%) Miscellaneous devices = 5 (11%) Analysis of barriers includes (a) type of insurance, (b) human error, (c) communication barrier, (d) deficit in training or knowledge, (e) no clear policy, (f) differences in clinical policy/ standard, (g) no DME benefit, (h) no clinical justification, and (i) error in communication/record keeping. Six patients with 7 emergency department (ED) visits and 4 inpatient admissions, totaling 24 hospital days, were temporally associated with delays in delivery of equipment over 30 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One half of commonly used DMEs were delivered within the first week. One quarter of more expensive required more steps for approval. Twenty-nine ED/hospital days with respiratory morbidities were temporally associated with delays.</p>","PeriodicalId":80262,"journal":{"name":"Care management journals : Journal of case management ; The journal of long term home health care","volume":"17 4","pages":"161-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Care management journals : Journal of case management ; The journal of long term home health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/1521-0987.17.4.161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: To systematically assess barriers delaying home respiratory equipment requisition and to evaluate for temporal correlation between delays and emergency room or hospitalization episodes.

Background: Initiation of home respiratory treatments is delayed because of delays in delivery of durable medical equipment (DME). This study assesses root causes of such delays from a system perspective. We also describe clinical consequences by measuring emergency room visits and hospitalization days for temporal correlations.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of DME ordering records from April 2011 to March of 2012.

Settings: Outpatient DME records in Pediatric Pulmonary Division.

Results: Of 164 available orders studied, deliveries were made as followed: 31 (19%) within 24 hr: 18 (59%) oxygen orders and 10 (32%) nebulizer orders 50 (30%) within 1 week: 25 (50%) nebulizer orders and 10 (20%) oxygen orders Delays: 45 (27%) delivered > 1 month: Bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) = 16 (36%) Oxygen = 12 (26%) Cough assist device = 7 (16%) Nebulizer = 5 (11%) Miscellaneous devices = 5 (11%) Analysis of barriers includes (a) type of insurance, (b) human error, (c) communication barrier, (d) deficit in training or knowledge, (e) no clear policy, (f) differences in clinical policy/ standard, (g) no DME benefit, (h) no clinical justification, and (i) error in communication/record keeping. Six patients with 7 emergency department (ED) visits and 4 inpatient admissions, totaling 24 hospital days, were temporally associated with delays in delivery of equipment over 30 days.

Conclusion: One half of commonly used DMEs were delivered within the first week. One quarter of more expensive required more steps for approval. Twenty-nine ED/hospital days with respiratory morbidities were temporally associated with delays.

门诊呼吸设备交付延迟的系统分析。
目的:系统地评估延迟家庭呼吸设备征用的障碍,并评估延迟与急诊室或住院事件之间的时间相关性。背景:由于耐用医疗设备(DME)的延迟交付,家庭呼吸治疗的启动被推迟。本研究从系统的角度评估了这种延迟的根本原因。我们还通过测量急诊室访问量和住院天数的时间相关性来描述临床后果。方法:回顾性分析2011年4月至2012年3月我院DME用药记录。设置:儿科肺科门诊DME记录。结果:在所研究的164个可用订单中,交货情况如下:31个(19%)在24小时内交货;18个(59%)氧气订单和10个(32%)雾化器订单在1周内交货;25个(50%)雾化器订单和10个(20%)氧气订单延迟交货:45个(27%)交付> 1个月;双水平气道正压通气(BPAP) = 16(36%)氧气= 12(26%)止咳辅助设备= 7(16%)雾化器= 5(11%)其他设备= 5(11%)障碍分析包括(a)保险类型,(b)人为错误,(c)沟通障碍,(d)培训或知识缺陷,(e)没有明确的政策,(f)临床政策/标准的差异,(g)没有DME益处,(h)没有临床理由,以及(i)沟通/记录保存错误。6名患者7次急诊科就诊,4次住院,共计24个住院日,设备交付延迟超过30天。结论:半数常用dme在1周内分娩。四分之一的费用需要更多的审批步骤。有呼吸系统疾病的29个急诊科/住院日在时间上与延误有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信