Traffic flow prediction using bi-directional gated recurrent unit method.

Urban informatics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1007/s44212-022-00015-z
Shengyou Wang, Chunfu Shao, Jie Zhang, Yan Zheng, Meng Meng
{"title":"Traffic flow prediction using bi-directional gated recurrent unit method.","authors":"Shengyou Wang,&nbsp;Chunfu Shao,&nbsp;Jie Zhang,&nbsp;Yan Zheng,&nbsp;Meng Meng","doi":"10.1007/s44212-022-00015-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traffic flow prediction plays an important role in intelligent transportation systems. To accurately capture the complex non-linear temporal characteristics of traffic flow, this paper adopts a Bi-directional Gated Recurrent Unit (Bi-GRU) model in traffic flow prediction. Compared to Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), which can memorize information from the previous sequence, this model can memorize the traffic flow information in both previous and subsequent sequence. To demonstrate the model's performance, a set of real case data at 1-hour intervals from 5 working days was used, wherein the dataset was separated into training and validation. To improve data quality, an augmented dickey-fuller unit root test and differential processing were performed before model training. Four benchmark models were used, including the Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (Bi-LSTM), and GRU. The prediction results show the superior performance of Bi-GRU. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of the Bi-GRU model are 30.38, 9.88%, and 23.35, respectively. The prediction accuracy of LSTM, Bi-LSTM, GRU, and Bi-GRU, which belong to deep learning methods, is significantly higher than that of the traditional ARIMA model. The MAPE difference of Bi-GRU and GRU is 0.48% which is a small prediction error value. The results show that the prediction accuracy of the peak period is higher than that of the low peak. The Bi-GRU model has a certain lag on traffic flow prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":75283,"journal":{"name":"Urban informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9713748/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44212-022-00015-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Traffic flow prediction plays an important role in intelligent transportation systems. To accurately capture the complex non-linear temporal characteristics of traffic flow, this paper adopts a Bi-directional Gated Recurrent Unit (Bi-GRU) model in traffic flow prediction. Compared to Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), which can memorize information from the previous sequence, this model can memorize the traffic flow information in both previous and subsequent sequence. To demonstrate the model's performance, a set of real case data at 1-hour intervals from 5 working days was used, wherein the dataset was separated into training and validation. To improve data quality, an augmented dickey-fuller unit root test and differential processing were performed before model training. Four benchmark models were used, including the Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (Bi-LSTM), and GRU. The prediction results show the superior performance of Bi-GRU. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of the Bi-GRU model are 30.38, 9.88%, and 23.35, respectively. The prediction accuracy of LSTM, Bi-LSTM, GRU, and Bi-GRU, which belong to deep learning methods, is significantly higher than that of the traditional ARIMA model. The MAPE difference of Bi-GRU and GRU is 0.48% which is a small prediction error value. The results show that the prediction accuracy of the peak period is higher than that of the low peak. The Bi-GRU model has a certain lag on traffic flow prediction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于双向门控循环单元法的交通流预测。
交通流预测在智能交通系统中起着重要作用。为了准确捕捉交通流复杂的非线性时间特征,本文采用双向门控循环单元(Bi-GRU)模型进行交通流预测。与门控循环单元(GRU)记忆前一个序列的信息相比,该模型可以记忆前一个序列和后一个序列的交通流信息。为了验证模型的性能,使用了5个工作日间隔1小时的真实案例数据集,其中数据集分为训练和验证两部分。为了提高数据质量,在模型训练前进行了增强dickey-fuller单位根检验和差分处理。采用自回归综合移动平均(ARIMA)、长短期记忆(LSTM)、双向长短期记忆(Bi-LSTM)和GRU四种基准模型。预测结果表明,Bi-GRU具有优越的性能。Bi-GRU模型的均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)和平均绝对误差(MAE)分别为30.38%、9.88%和23.35%。LSTM、Bi-LSTM、GRU和Bi-GRU属于深度学习方法,其预测精度明显高于传统的ARIMA模型。Bi-GRU与GRU的MAPE差值为0.48%,预测误差较小。结果表明,峰值时段的预测精度高于低峰时段的预测精度。Bi-GRU模型在交通流预测上存在一定的滞后性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信