Treatment of Dissecting Vertebral Pseudoaneurysms: A Single-Center Experience.

Annals of neurology and neuroscience Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-12
E Panther, B Lucke-Wold, D Laurent, C Osorno-Cruz, Y Mehkri, R Turner, A Polifka, M Koch, B Hoh, N Chalouhi
{"title":"Treatment of Dissecting Vertebral Pseudoaneurysms: A Single-Center Experience.","authors":"E Panther, B Lucke-Wold, D Laurent, C Osorno-Cruz, Y Mehkri, R Turner, A Polifka, M Koch, B Hoh, N Chalouhi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dissecting vertebral artery pseudoaneurysms represent a unique clinical challenge with careful appreciation for location of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery. Limited data is available in terms of outcomes regarding the various treatment modalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>11 patients with dissecting pseudoaneurysms were identified from 2013-2021. Pseudoaneurysm size and morphology, clinical presentation, and treatment approach was collected. Success of treatment was recorded based on post-operative imaging as well as documented overall patient outcomes. Three primary treatment modalities emerged: coil embolization, stent assisted coiling, and flow diversion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 11 patients, 5 were female and 6 were male with an age from 36 to 69.7. 7 had ruptured pseudoaneurysms at time of treatment. Size of pseudoaneurysm ranged from 3 to 6 mm. 8 were on the right and 3 were on the left vertebral artery. 8 were proximal to PICA and 3 were distal. Co-dominance of vertebral filling was seen in 5 patients, 5 with dominance through right vertebral artery, and 1 with dominance through left vertebral artery. Variability existed in treatment approaches with 4 patients undergoing coil occlusion, 5 patients undergoing flow diversion stenting, and 2 patients undergoing flow diversion stenting with jailed coiling. 1 patient had enlargement of pseudoaneurysm while inpatient and required a second flow diversion device. 1 patient had two flow diversion devices placed initially at time of treatment due to morphology of PA. 6 patients had repeat angiograms between 6 to 9 months with complete occlusion. 3 had CTA or MRA with complete occlusion for those that had flow diversion, they were transitioned from aspirin and clopidogrel to aspirin monotherapy after first repeat angiogram. 6 patients required shunt placement for hydrocephalus. 1 patient died prior to discharge due to sepsis. 2 patients died post discharge: 1 with myocardial infarction and the 2nd due to urosepsis.Dissecting vertebral pseudoaneurysm has high morbidity and mortality if rupture occurs. Location of PICA origin influences treatment approach. Patients with poor Hunt/Hess scores upon arrival had increased risk for systemic infection and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":92000,"journal":{"name":"Annals of neurology and neuroscience","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of neurology and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dissecting vertebral artery pseudoaneurysms represent a unique clinical challenge with careful appreciation for location of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery. Limited data is available in terms of outcomes regarding the various treatment modalities.

Methods: 11 patients with dissecting pseudoaneurysms were identified from 2013-2021. Pseudoaneurysm size and morphology, clinical presentation, and treatment approach was collected. Success of treatment was recorded based on post-operative imaging as well as documented overall patient outcomes. Three primary treatment modalities emerged: coil embolization, stent assisted coiling, and flow diversion.

Results: Of the 11 patients, 5 were female and 6 were male with an age from 36 to 69.7. 7 had ruptured pseudoaneurysms at time of treatment. Size of pseudoaneurysm ranged from 3 to 6 mm. 8 were on the right and 3 were on the left vertebral artery. 8 were proximal to PICA and 3 were distal. Co-dominance of vertebral filling was seen in 5 patients, 5 with dominance through right vertebral artery, and 1 with dominance through left vertebral artery. Variability existed in treatment approaches with 4 patients undergoing coil occlusion, 5 patients undergoing flow diversion stenting, and 2 patients undergoing flow diversion stenting with jailed coiling. 1 patient had enlargement of pseudoaneurysm while inpatient and required a second flow diversion device. 1 patient had two flow diversion devices placed initially at time of treatment due to morphology of PA. 6 patients had repeat angiograms between 6 to 9 months with complete occlusion. 3 had CTA or MRA with complete occlusion for those that had flow diversion, they were transitioned from aspirin and clopidogrel to aspirin monotherapy after first repeat angiogram. 6 patients required shunt placement for hydrocephalus. 1 patient died prior to discharge due to sepsis. 2 patients died post discharge: 1 with myocardial infarction and the 2nd due to urosepsis.Dissecting vertebral pseudoaneurysm has high morbidity and mortality if rupture occurs. Location of PICA origin influences treatment approach. Patients with poor Hunt/Hess scores upon arrival had increased risk for systemic infection and mortality.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

剥离性椎体假动脉瘤的治疗:单中心经验
背景:解剖性椎动脉假性动脉瘤是一项独特的临床挑战,需要仔细观察小脑后下动脉的位置。关于各种治疗方式的结果,目前可用的数据有限。方法:2013-2021 年间,确定了 11 例解剖性假动脉瘤患者。收集了假动脉瘤的大小和形态、临床表现和治疗方法。根据术后成像以及记录的患者总体疗效,记录治疗的成功率。得出了三种主要治疗方式:线圈栓塞、支架辅助卷曲和血流分流:11 名患者中,5 名女性,6 名男性,年龄在 36 岁至 69.7 岁之间。7 名患者在接受治疗时假性动脉瘤已经破裂。假性动脉瘤的大小从 3 毫米到 6 毫米不等。8个位于右侧,3个位于左侧椎动脉。8 个位于 PICA 近端,3 个位于远端。5 名患者的椎动脉充盈为共支配,5 名为右侧椎动脉支配,1 名为左侧椎动脉支配。治疗方法存在差异,4 名患者接受了线圈闭塞术,5 名患者接受了血流分流支架植入术,2 名患者接受了血流分流支架植入术和狱式线圈术。1 名患者在住院期间假性动脉瘤扩大,需要使用第二个血流分流装置。1名患者由于PA的形态问题,在治疗时最初放置了两个血流分流装置。6 名患者在 6 到 9 个月之间重复进行了血管造影检查,结果显示完全闭塞。3名患者进行了CTA或MRA检查,结果显示完全闭塞。6 名患者因脑积水需要进行分流术。1 名患者在出院前因败血症死亡。2 名患者出院后死亡:如果发生破裂,剖开性椎体假动脉瘤的发病率和死亡率都很高。PICA起源的位置影响治疗方法。抵达时Hunt/Hess评分较低的患者全身感染和死亡风险较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信