A 'catastrophic consequence': Fascism's debate on the legal status of Libyans and the issue of mixed marriages (1938-1939).

Andrea Tarchi
{"title":"A 'catastrophic consequence': Fascism's debate on the legal status of Libyans and the issue of mixed marriages (1938-1939).","authors":"Andrea Tarchi","doi":"10.1080/13688790.2021.1964764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article assesses the role that institutional concern for the possibility of interracial marriages played in the Italian Fascist party's internal debate regarding the legal status of Libyans in the second half of the 1930s. Following the end of the 'pacification' of the Libyan resistance in 1932, Governor Italo Balbo pushed for the region's demographic colonization and the legal inclusion of the colonial territory and its population within the metropole. In contrast, Fascist Party officials in Rome endorsed starker racial segregation in the colonies based on the racist ideology that permeated the regime after the declaration of the empire in 1936. The legal inclusion of Libyans within the metropolitan body politic touched upon the regime's most sensitive theme: the need to avoid any promiscuity that could interfere with the racial consciousness of Fascist Italy. This article analyses this dispute through the lens of interracial marriage and concubinage regulations, framing it into the definition of a normative standard of Italian whiteness through the racialization of the colonial Other.</p>","PeriodicalId":92115,"journal":{"name":"Postcolonial studies : culture, politics, economy","volume":"25 4","pages":"527-544"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1a/0a/CPCS_25_1964764.PMC9707729.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postcolonial studies : culture, politics, economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2021.1964764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article assesses the role that institutional concern for the possibility of interracial marriages played in the Italian Fascist party's internal debate regarding the legal status of Libyans in the second half of the 1930s. Following the end of the 'pacification' of the Libyan resistance in 1932, Governor Italo Balbo pushed for the region's demographic colonization and the legal inclusion of the colonial territory and its population within the metropole. In contrast, Fascist Party officials in Rome endorsed starker racial segregation in the colonies based on the racist ideology that permeated the regime after the declaration of the empire in 1936. The legal inclusion of Libyans within the metropolitan body politic touched upon the regime's most sensitive theme: the need to avoid any promiscuity that could interfere with the racial consciousness of Fascist Italy. This article analyses this dispute through the lens of interracial marriage and concubinage regulations, framing it into the definition of a normative standard of Italian whiteness through the racialization of the colonial Other.

一个“灾难性的后果”:法西斯主义对利比亚人的法律地位和异族通婚问题的辩论(1938-1939)。
本文评估了20世纪30年代下半叶,意大利法西斯党内部关于利比亚人法律地位的辩论中,对异族通婚可能性的制度性关注所起的作用。1932年,随着利比亚抵抗运动的“平定”结束,总督Italo Balbo推动了该地区的人口殖民化,并将殖民领土及其人口纳入大都市。相比之下,罗马的法西斯党官员支持在殖民地实行更严格的种族隔离,这种种族主义意识形态在1936年宣布帝国成立后渗透到该政权。将利比亚人合法地纳入大都会政体,触及了该政权最敏感的主题:避免任何可能干扰法西斯意大利种族意识的滥交。本文通过跨种族婚姻和纳妾制度的视角来分析这一争议,通过殖民他者的种族化,将其框定为意大利白人的规范标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信