Comparison of Immune Responses in Pigs Infected with Chinese Highly Pathogenic PRRS Virus Strain HV and North American Strain NADC-20.

The Open Virology Journal Pub Date : 2017-06-30 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874357901711010073
X Li, A Galliher-Beckley, L Wang, J Nietfeld, W Feng, J Shi
{"title":"Comparison of Immune Responses in Pigs Infected with Chinese Highly Pathogenic PRRS Virus Strain HV and North American Strain NADC-20.","authors":"X Li,&nbsp;A Galliher-Beckley,&nbsp;L Wang,&nbsp;J Nietfeld,&nbsp;W Feng,&nbsp;J Shi","doi":"10.2174/1874357901711010073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chinese HP-PRRSV characterized by high morbidity and mortality of all ages of pigs emerged since 2006 in China. The immune response of HP-PRRSV was never compared with conventional low pathogenic PRRSV strain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we compared the immune responses elicited by a Chinese HP-PRRSV strain HV and a North American RRSV strain NADC20 infections.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Pigs infected with NADC-20 showed significantly higher Ab titers than HV-PRRSV infected pigs at 9 DPI. Infection with HV-PRRSV induced a significantly higher levels of TNF-α and IL-10 in both sera and lung tissues and higher IFN-α and IFN-γ in the serum. Flow cytometry analysis showed that HV-PRRSV infected pigs generated significantly higher frequencies of NK cells in the peripheral blood and Th/memory, CTLs, and T-reg cells in the lung as compared with NADC-20 infected pigs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that different immunity profiles were elicited by HV-PRRSV and NADC-20, and these differences may contribute to the distinct pathogenesis of HV-PRRSV and NADC-20.</p>","PeriodicalId":23111,"journal":{"name":"The Open Virology Journal","volume":"11 ","pages":"73-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5543616/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Virology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874357901711010073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Introduction: Chinese HP-PRRSV characterized by high morbidity and mortality of all ages of pigs emerged since 2006 in China. The immune response of HP-PRRSV was never compared with conventional low pathogenic PRRSV strain.

Objective: In this study, we compared the immune responses elicited by a Chinese HP-PRRSV strain HV and a North American RRSV strain NADC20 infections.

Result: Pigs infected with NADC-20 showed significantly higher Ab titers than HV-PRRSV infected pigs at 9 DPI. Infection with HV-PRRSV induced a significantly higher levels of TNF-α and IL-10 in both sera and lung tissues and higher IFN-α and IFN-γ in the serum. Flow cytometry analysis showed that HV-PRRSV infected pigs generated significantly higher frequencies of NK cells in the peripheral blood and Th/memory, CTLs, and T-reg cells in the lung as compared with NADC-20 infected pigs.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that different immunity profiles were elicited by HV-PRRSV and NADC-20, and these differences may contribute to the distinct pathogenesis of HV-PRRSV and NADC-20.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

猪感染中国高致病性PRRS病毒HV株与北美NADC-20株免疫应答的比较
中国HP-PRRSV自2006年以来在中国出现,其特点是所有年龄猪的高发病率和高死亡率。HP-PRRSV的免疫应答从未与常规低致病性PRRSV进行比较。目的:比较一株中国HP-PRRSV HV和一株北美RRSV NADC20感染引起的免疫应答。结果:感染NADC-20的猪在9 DPI时的Ab滴度明显高于感染HV-PRRSV的猪。感染HV-PRRSV导致血清和肺组织中TNF-α和IL-10水平升高,血清中IFN-α和IFN-γ水平升高。流式细胞术分析显示,与NADC-20感染的猪相比,HV-PRRSV感染的猪外周血中NK细胞和肺中Th/memory、ctl和T-reg细胞的频率明显更高。结论:本研究表明,HV-PRRSV和NADC-20引发的免疫谱不同,这些差异可能是导致HV-PRRSV和NADC-20发病机制不同的原因之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信