Reducing patient waiting time and length of stay in an Acute Care Pediatric Emergency Department.

BMJ quality improvement reports Pub Date : 2017-06-26 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjquality.u212356.w7916
Milfi Al-Onazi, Ahmed Al Hajri, Angela Caswell, Maria Leizl Hugo Villanueva, Zuhair Mohammed, Vania Esteves, Faith Vabasa, Khaled Al-Surimi
{"title":"Reducing patient waiting time and length of stay in an Acute Care Pediatric Emergency Department.","authors":"Milfi Al-Onazi,&nbsp;Ahmed Al Hajri,&nbsp;Angela Caswell,&nbsp;Maria Leizl Hugo Villanueva,&nbsp;Zuhair Mohammed,&nbsp;Vania Esteves,&nbsp;Faith Vabasa,&nbsp;Khaled Al-Surimi","doi":"10.1136/bmjquality.u212356.w7916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prolonged waiting times and length of stay in Pediatric Emergency Department, are the two of the most challenging patient and clinical outcomes of healthcare institution. These emerged due to various reasons, namely: the use of triaging process and patient flow criteria that eventually lead to bottlenecks and overcrowding in the ED. After realizing the root causes of the prolonged waiting times and length of stay, the KASCH ED instigated a team to study the factors and thereby arrive at a considerable conclusion that will result in an improvement. The quality improvement project was initiated and steps were undertaken to improve the flow, reduce the waiting times, and reduce the overcrowding in Pediatric Emergency Acute Care Unit. The primary cause identified was inadequate team awareness and lack of the ED process flow, thus creating confusion as to where the type of patients based on the triage level will be assessed, managed and treated. Using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) as guide in triaging patients, a theory called Pediatric Rapid Assessment and Management (PRAM) was introduced in the Acute Care Unit. This certain model is basically aimed to rapidly assess and managed the patients who were triaged as Level III and Level IV within a period of 30 minutes. Several PDSA cycles were tested and implemented in order to assure that the process fit the criteria and the process flow will be improved. Following the completion of each cycle, significant improvements were noted, such as patients being assessed in Initial Assessment Room on average time less than the target of 15 minutes. In like manner, patients' length of stay on average less than 15 minutes in PRAM bed. The total time for assessment and plan of management is with a target time of less than 30 minutes. The team continuously drive th process and monitored the key performance indicators of the PRAM during the study period and subsequent improvement strategies were likewise implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":91218,"journal":{"name":"BMJ quality improvement reports","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjquality.u212356.w7916","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ quality improvement reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u212356.w7916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Prolonged waiting times and length of stay in Pediatric Emergency Department, are the two of the most challenging patient and clinical outcomes of healthcare institution. These emerged due to various reasons, namely: the use of triaging process and patient flow criteria that eventually lead to bottlenecks and overcrowding in the ED. After realizing the root causes of the prolonged waiting times and length of stay, the KASCH ED instigated a team to study the factors and thereby arrive at a considerable conclusion that will result in an improvement. The quality improvement project was initiated and steps were undertaken to improve the flow, reduce the waiting times, and reduce the overcrowding in Pediatric Emergency Acute Care Unit. The primary cause identified was inadequate team awareness and lack of the ED process flow, thus creating confusion as to where the type of patients based on the triage level will be assessed, managed and treated. Using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) as guide in triaging patients, a theory called Pediatric Rapid Assessment and Management (PRAM) was introduced in the Acute Care Unit. This certain model is basically aimed to rapidly assess and managed the patients who were triaged as Level III and Level IV within a period of 30 minutes. Several PDSA cycles were tested and implemented in order to assure that the process fit the criteria and the process flow will be improved. Following the completion of each cycle, significant improvements were noted, such as patients being assessed in Initial Assessment Room on average time less than the target of 15 minutes. In like manner, patients' length of stay on average less than 15 minutes in PRAM bed. The total time for assessment and plan of management is with a target time of less than 30 minutes. The team continuously drive th process and monitored the key performance indicators of the PRAM during the study period and subsequent improvement strategies were likewise implemented.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

减少患者在急症护理儿科急诊科的等待时间和住院时间。
儿科急诊科的等待时间延长和住院时间延长,是医疗机构最具挑战性的两个患者和临床结果。这些问题是由各种原因引起的,即:使用分诊过程和患者流量标准最终导致急诊科出现瓶颈和过度拥挤。在意识到长时间等待和住院时间的根本原因后,KASCH急诊科组织了一个团队研究这些因素,从而得出了一个可观的结论,将导致改善。启动了质量改进项目,并采取步骤改善流量,缩短等候时间,减少儿科急症急症室的拥挤情况。确定的主要原因是团队意识不足和缺乏急诊科流程,因此在根据分诊级别对患者类型进行评估、管理和治疗方面造成混乱。使用加拿大分诊和敏锐度量表(CTAS)作为分诊病人的指导,一种称为儿科快速评估和管理(PRAM)的理论被引入急症监护室。该特定模型的基本目标是在30分钟内对被分类为III级和IV级的患者进行快速评估和管理。几个PDSA循环进行了测试和实施,以确保工艺符合标准,工艺流程将得到改进。在每个周期完成后,显著的改善被注意到,例如患者在初始评估室接受评估的平均时间少于15分钟的目标。同样,患者在PRAM床的平均停留时间小于15分钟。评估和管理计划的总时间,目标时间不超过30分钟。在研究期间,团队持续推动该过程并监控PRAM的关键绩效指标,并实施后续改进策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信