Different Places, Different Ideas: Reimagining Practice in American Psychiatric Nursing After World War II.

IF 0.2 Q4 HISTORY
Kylie M Smith
{"title":"Different Places, Different Ideas: Reimagining Practice in American Psychiatric Nursing After World War II.","authors":"Kylie M Smith","doi":"10.1891/1062-8061.26.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1952, Hildegard Peplau published her textbook Interpersonal Relations in Nursing: A Conceptual Frame of Reference for Psychodynamic Nursing. This was the same year the American Psychiatric Association (APA) published the first edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (1st ed.; DSM-I; APA). These events occurred in the context of a rapidly changing policy and practice environment in the United States after World War II, where the passing of the National Mental Health Act in 1946 released vast amounts of funding for the establishment of the National Institute of Mental Health and the development of advanced educational programs for the mental health professions including nursing. This article explores the work of two nurse leaders, Hildegard Peplau and Dorothy Mereness, as they developed their respective graduate psychiatric nursing programs and sought to create new knowledge for psychiatric nursing that would facilitate the development of advanced nursing practice. Both nurses had strong ideas about what they felt this practice should look like and developed distinct and particular approaches to their respective programs. This reflected a common belief that it was only through nurse-led education that psychiatric nursing could shape its own practice and control its own future. At the same time, there are similarities in the thinking of Peplau and Mereness that demonstrate the link between the specific social context of mental health immediately after World War II and the development of modern psychiatric nursing. Psychiatric nurses were able to gain significant control of their own education and practice after the war, but this was not without a struggle and some limitations, which continue to impact on the profession today.</p>","PeriodicalId":42438,"journal":{"name":"NURSING HISTORY REVIEW","volume":"26 1","pages":"17-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1891/1062-8061.26.17","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NURSING HISTORY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/1062-8061.26.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1952, Hildegard Peplau published her textbook Interpersonal Relations in Nursing: A Conceptual Frame of Reference for Psychodynamic Nursing. This was the same year the American Psychiatric Association (APA) published the first edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (1st ed.; DSM-I; APA). These events occurred in the context of a rapidly changing policy and practice environment in the United States after World War II, where the passing of the National Mental Health Act in 1946 released vast amounts of funding for the establishment of the National Institute of Mental Health and the development of advanced educational programs for the mental health professions including nursing. This article explores the work of two nurse leaders, Hildegard Peplau and Dorothy Mereness, as they developed their respective graduate psychiatric nursing programs and sought to create new knowledge for psychiatric nursing that would facilitate the development of advanced nursing practice. Both nurses had strong ideas about what they felt this practice should look like and developed distinct and particular approaches to their respective programs. This reflected a common belief that it was only through nurse-led education that psychiatric nursing could shape its own practice and control its own future. At the same time, there are similarities in the thinking of Peplau and Mereness that demonstrate the link between the specific social context of mental health immediately after World War II and the development of modern psychiatric nursing. Psychiatric nurses were able to gain significant control of their own education and practice after the war, but this was not without a struggle and some limitations, which continue to impact on the profession today.

不同的地方,不同的想法:二战后美国精神科护理的重塑实践。
1952年,Hildegard Peplau出版了她的教科书《护理中的人际关系:心理动力护理的概念参考框架》。同年,美国精神病学协会(APA)出版了第一版《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第一版;DSM-I;APA)。这些事件发生在二战后美国政策和实践环境迅速变化的背景下,1946年通过的《国家精神卫生法》为建立国家精神卫生研究所提供了大量资金,并为包括护理在内的精神卫生专业发展了先进的教育项目。本文探讨了两位护士领袖Hildegard Peplau和Dorothy Mereness的工作,他们开发了各自的精神病学护理研究生课程,并寻求为精神病学护理创造新的知识,以促进高级护理实践的发展。两位护士都对自己认为这种做法应该是什么样子有强烈的想法,并为各自的项目开发了独特的方法。这反映了一种普遍的信念,即只有通过护士主导的教育,精神科护理才能塑造自己的实践并控制自己的未来。与此同时,Peplau和Mereness的思想也有相似之处,这表明了第二次世界大战后心理健康的特定社会背景与现代精神病学护理的发展之间的联系。战后,精神科护士能够在很大程度上控制自己的教育和实践,但这并非没有斗争和一些限制,这继续影响着今天的职业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Nursing History Review, an annual peer-reviewed publication, is a showcase for the most significant current research on nursing and health care history. Contributors include national and international scholars representing many different disciplinary backgrounds. Regular sections include scholarly articles, reviews of the best books on nursing and abstracts of new doctoral dissertations and health care history, and invited commentaries. Historians, researchers, and individuals fascinated with the rich field of nursing will find this an important resource.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书