Improving coding accuracy in an academic practice.

U.S. Army Medical Department journal Pub Date : 2017-07-01
Dana Nguyen, Heather O'Mara, Robert Powell
{"title":"Improving coding accuracy in an academic practice.","authors":"Dana Nguyen,&nbsp;Heather O'Mara,&nbsp;Robert Powell","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Practice management has become an increasingly important component of graduate medical education. This applies to every practice environment; private, academic, and military. One of the most critical aspects of practice management is documentation and coding for physician services, as they directly affect the financial success of any practice. Our quality improvement project aimed to implement a new and innovative method for teaching billing and coding in a longitudinal fashion in a family medicine residency. We hypothesized that implementation of a new teaching strategy would increase coding accuracy rates among residents and faculty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: single group, pretest-posttest.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>military family medicine residency clinic. Study populations: 7 faculty physicians and 18 resident physicians participated as learners in the project. Educational intervention: monthly structured coding learning sessions in the academic curriculum that involved learner-presented cases, small group case review, and large group discussion.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>overall coding accuracy (compliance) percentage and coding accuracy per year group for the subjects that were able to participate longitudinally. Statistical tests used: average coding accuracy for population; paired t test to assess improvement between 2 intervention periods, both aggregate and by year group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall coding accuracy rates remained stable over the course of time regardless of the modality of the educational intervention. A paired t test was conducted to compare coding accuracy rates at baseline (mean (M)=26.4%, SD=10%) to accuracy rates after all educational interventions were complete (M=26.8%, SD=12%); t24=-0.127, P=.90.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Didactic teaching and small group discussion sessions did not improve overall coding accuracy in a residency practice. Future interventions could focus on educating providers at the individual level.</p>","PeriodicalId":88789,"journal":{"name":"U.S. Army Medical Department journal","volume":" 2-17","pages":"95-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"U.S. Army Medical Department journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Practice management has become an increasingly important component of graduate medical education. This applies to every practice environment; private, academic, and military. One of the most critical aspects of practice management is documentation and coding for physician services, as they directly affect the financial success of any practice. Our quality improvement project aimed to implement a new and innovative method for teaching billing and coding in a longitudinal fashion in a family medicine residency. We hypothesized that implementation of a new teaching strategy would increase coding accuracy rates among residents and faculty.

Methods: Design: single group, pretest-posttest.

Setting: military family medicine residency clinic. Study populations: 7 faculty physicians and 18 resident physicians participated as learners in the project. Educational intervention: monthly structured coding learning sessions in the academic curriculum that involved learner-presented cases, small group case review, and large group discussion.

Main outcome measures: overall coding accuracy (compliance) percentage and coding accuracy per year group for the subjects that were able to participate longitudinally. Statistical tests used: average coding accuracy for population; paired t test to assess improvement between 2 intervention periods, both aggregate and by year group.

Results: Overall coding accuracy rates remained stable over the course of time regardless of the modality of the educational intervention. A paired t test was conducted to compare coding accuracy rates at baseline (mean (M)=26.4%, SD=10%) to accuracy rates after all educational interventions were complete (M=26.8%, SD=12%); t24=-0.127, P=.90.

Conclusions: Didactic teaching and small group discussion sessions did not improve overall coding accuracy in a residency practice. Future interventions could focus on educating providers at the individual level.

在学术实践中提高编码的准确性。
实践管理已成为研究生医学教育中日益重要的组成部分。这适用于每一个练习环境;私人的、学术的和军事的。实践管理中最关键的方面之一是医生服务的文档和编码,因为它们直接影响任何实践的财务成功。我们的质量改进项目旨在实施一种新的创新方法,以纵向方式在家庭医学住院医师中教授计费和编码。我们假设新的教学策略的实施将提高住院医师和教师的编码准确率。方法:设计:单组,前测后测。单位:军人家庭医学住院医师诊所。研究人群:7名教员医师和18名住院医师作为学习者参与了该项目。教育干预:每月在学术课程中进行结构化的编码学习,包括学习者提出的案例、小组案例回顾和大型小组讨论。主要结果测量:总体编码准确性(依从性)百分比和能够纵向参与的受试者每年组的编码准确性。使用的统计检验:总体平均编码准确率;配对t检验评估两个干预期之间的改善情况,包括总干预期和按年组干预期。结果:无论教育干预方式如何,总体编码正确率在一段时间内保持稳定。采用配对t检验比较基线时的编码准确率(均值(M)=26.4%, SD=10%)与所有教育干预完成后的编码准确率(M=26.8%, SD=12%);t24 = -0.127, P = .90。结论:在住院医师实习中,说教式教学和小组讨论并不能提高整体编码的准确性。未来的干预措施可能侧重于个人层面的教育提供者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信