Effect of smokeless tobacco on surface roughness of dental restorations.

U.S. Army Medical Department journal Pub Date : 2017-07-01
Shani O Thompson, Gerald D Griffin, Nicole Meyer, Manuel Pelaez
{"title":"Effect of smokeless tobacco on surface roughness of dental restorations.","authors":"Shani O Thompson,&nbsp;Gerald D Griffin,&nbsp;Nicole Meyer,&nbsp;Manuel Pelaez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Surface alterations of dental restorations can result in increased plaque biofilm. This leads to increased risk of premature restoration failure. Smokeless tobacco, in common use by some US military personnel, represents a potential source for surface alteration. If smokeless tobacco causes an untoward effect, selection of a more resistant restorative material could increase restoration longevity, thus minimizing lost work time and costs associated with replacement of failed restorations.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Comparatively assess the effect of smokeless tobacco/salivary substitute mixture on altering surface roughness of amalgam, composite resin, and resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) restorations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty cubic restorations (3 groups of 20) were fabricated using a 4 mm by 3 mm Teflon mold. One examiner assessed the restorations at time points representing zero days, one day, one week, 2 weeks, one month, and 3 months. The data obtained were collected using a surface profilometer, measured in micrometers. Data were statistically analyzed using 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. A difference was significant if P< .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Confidence levels with a 95% overall rating received a clinically acceptable classification. The 2-way ANOVA test detected significant differences between baseline, one day, one week, 2 weeks, one month, and 3-month data for surface roughness (P<.05). With respect to time and restoration type, results proved statistically significant with P<.0001. All restorations were statistically significant with respect to change in surface roughness with RMGIs showing the greatest surface roughness alteration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Smokeless tobacco mixed with a salivary substitute altered restoration surface roughness over time. Resin-modified glass isonomer restorations demonstrate the greatest alteration of surface roughness, with amalgam restorations showing the least. Amalgam remains the preferential restorative material in patients who use smokeless tobacco.</p>","PeriodicalId":88789,"journal":{"name":"U.S. Army Medical Department journal","volume":" 2-17","pages":"80-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"U.S. Army Medical Department journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical relevance: Surface alterations of dental restorations can result in increased plaque biofilm. This leads to increased risk of premature restoration failure. Smokeless tobacco, in common use by some US military personnel, represents a potential source for surface alteration. If smokeless tobacco causes an untoward effect, selection of a more resistant restorative material could increase restoration longevity, thus minimizing lost work time and costs associated with replacement of failed restorations.

Purpose: Comparatively assess the effect of smokeless tobacco/salivary substitute mixture on altering surface roughness of amalgam, composite resin, and resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) restorations.

Materials and methods: Sixty cubic restorations (3 groups of 20) were fabricated using a 4 mm by 3 mm Teflon mold. One examiner assessed the restorations at time points representing zero days, one day, one week, 2 weeks, one month, and 3 months. The data obtained were collected using a surface profilometer, measured in micrometers. Data were statistically analyzed using 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. A difference was significant if P< .05.

Results: Confidence levels with a 95% overall rating received a clinically acceptable classification. The 2-way ANOVA test detected significant differences between baseline, one day, one week, 2 weeks, one month, and 3-month data for surface roughness (P<.05). With respect to time and restoration type, results proved statistically significant with P<.0001. All restorations were statistically significant with respect to change in surface roughness with RMGIs showing the greatest surface roughness alteration.

Conclusion: Smokeless tobacco mixed with a salivary substitute altered restoration surface roughness over time. Resin-modified glass isonomer restorations demonstrate the greatest alteration of surface roughness, with amalgam restorations showing the least. Amalgam remains the preferential restorative material in patients who use smokeless tobacco.

无烟烟草对口腔修复体表面粗糙度的影响。
临床相关性:牙修复体表面改变可导致菌斑生物膜增加。这增加了过早修复失败的风险。一些美国军事人员普遍使用的无烟烟草代表了表面变化的潜在来源。如果无烟烟草造成不良影响,选择一种抗性更强的修复材料可以延长修复的寿命,从而最大限度地减少与更换失败修复体相关的工作时间和成本损失。目的:比较评价无烟烟草/唾液替代混合物对汞合金、复合树脂和树脂改性玻璃离聚体(RMGI)修复体表面粗糙度的影响。材料与方法:采用4mm × 3mm特氟龙模具制作60个立方体修复体(3组20个)。一位审查员在0天、1天、1周、2周、1个月和3个月的时间点评估修复体。所获得的数据是用表面轮廓仪收集的,测量单位为微米。资料采用2-way方差分析(ANOVA)检验进行统计学分析。P< 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:置信水平为95%的总体评分获得临床可接受的分类。双因素方差分析检测了基线、一天、一周、2周、一个月和3个月表面粗糙度数据的显著差异(结论:无烟烟草与唾液替代品混合会随着时间的推移改变修复表面粗糙度。树脂改性玻璃异构体修复体的表面粗糙度变化最大,汞合金修复体的表面粗糙度变化最小。汞合金仍然是使用无烟烟草的患者首选的修复材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信