Perceptıon scale of barrıers to contraceptıve use: a methodologıcal study.

Fertility research and practice Pub Date : 2017-08-03 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40738-017-0038-9
Selma Sen, Aynur Cetinkaya, Aysel Cavuslar
{"title":"Perceptıon scale of barrıers to contraceptıve use: a methodologıcal study.","authors":"Selma Sen,&nbsp;Aynur Cetinkaya,&nbsp;Aysel Cavuslar","doi":"10.1186/s40738-017-0038-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this study was to design and develop the Perception Scale of Barriers to Contraceptive Use (PSBCU) as a measurement tool for the qualitative assessment of the barriers and obstacles women perceived with regard to contraceptive use or low rates of contraceptive use in women using family planning services.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The data for this methodological study were collected using the face-to-face interview technique from 320 married women between the ages of 15-49 who were attending clinics at the Hafsa Sultan Hospital, CBU. The data collection tools used in the study, which was carried out from May to September 2014, were the \"Introductory Information Form\" and the \"Perception Scale of Barriers to Contraceptive Use\". Language validity and construct validity (explanatory factor analysis) were applied in order to test the validity of the Perception Scale of Barriers to Contraceptive Use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Kaiser Meier Olkin (KMO) analysis was performed to determine the availability of the scale for the size of participants. The sample adequacy calculated as the KMO value was 0.916 and the Bartlett's Test of Sphericity (X<sup>2</sup> = 6721.793 <i>p</i> < 0.000) sample size analysis value was found to be sufficient for factor analysis. The total Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of 34 items which included three factors explaining 54.95% of the variance after Varimax rotation was calculated to be 0.95. The largest factor was the \"cognitive domain\" explaining 18.89% of the variance, followed by the \"emotional domain\" explaining 18.05% of the variance, and finally the \"social domain\" explaining 18.01% of the variance. Item-total score correlation coefficients of scale items were found to be between 0.54 and 0.83.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study demonstrateded that the \"Perception Scale of Barriers to Contraceptive Use\" was valid and reliable. We believe that the scale is suitable for use by women in a family planning education and training programs in order to evaluate their situation. It should also be assessed for validity and reliability for different groups (adolescents, men, etc.).</p>","PeriodicalId":87254,"journal":{"name":"Fertility research and practice","volume":"3 ","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40738-017-0038-9","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-017-0038-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to design and develop the Perception Scale of Barriers to Contraceptive Use (PSBCU) as a measurement tool for the qualitative assessment of the barriers and obstacles women perceived with regard to contraceptive use or low rates of contraceptive use in women using family planning services.

Method: The data for this methodological study were collected using the face-to-face interview technique from 320 married women between the ages of 15-49 who were attending clinics at the Hafsa Sultan Hospital, CBU. The data collection tools used in the study, which was carried out from May to September 2014, were the "Introductory Information Form" and the "Perception Scale of Barriers to Contraceptive Use". Language validity and construct validity (explanatory factor analysis) were applied in order to test the validity of the Perception Scale of Barriers to Contraceptive Use.

Results: Kaiser Meier Olkin (KMO) analysis was performed to determine the availability of the scale for the size of participants. The sample adequacy calculated as the KMO value was 0.916 and the Bartlett's Test of Sphericity (X2 = 6721.793 p < 0.000) sample size analysis value was found to be sufficient for factor analysis. The total Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of 34 items which included three factors explaining 54.95% of the variance after Varimax rotation was calculated to be 0.95. The largest factor was the "cognitive domain" explaining 18.89% of the variance, followed by the "emotional domain" explaining 18.05% of the variance, and finally the "social domain" explaining 18.01% of the variance. Item-total score correlation coefficients of scale items were found to be between 0.54 and 0.83.

Conclusions: The study demonstrateded that the "Perception Scale of Barriers to Contraceptive Use" was valid and reliable. We believe that the scale is suitable for use by women in a family planning education and training programs in order to evaluate their situation. It should also be assessed for validity and reliability for different groups (adolescents, men, etc.).

Abstract Image

Perceptıon规模barrıers到contraceptıve的使用:一项methodologıcal研究。
背景:本研究的目的是设计和开发避孕措施使用障碍感知量表(PSBCU),作为定性评估妇女在使用避孕措施或使用计划生育服务的妇女避孕措施使用率低方面所感知的障碍和障碍的测量工具。方法:本方法学研究的数据采用面对面访谈技术收集320名年龄在15-49岁之间的已婚妇女,她们在CBU的Hafsa Sultan医院就诊。本研究于2014年5月至9月进行,使用的数据收集工具为“介绍信息表”和“避孕使用障碍感知量表”。采用语言效度和结构效度(解释因子分析)对避孕措施使用障碍感知量表进行效度检验。结果:采用Kaiser Meier Olkin (KMO)分析来确定量表对参与者规模的可用性。以KMO值计算的样本充分性为0.916,Bartlett球形检验(X2 = 6721.793 p)。结论:研究表明《避孕措施使用障碍感知量表》有效、可靠。我们认为,该量表适合妇女在计划生育教育和培训项目中使用,以评估她们的情况。还应评估其对不同群体(青少年、男性等)的有效性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信