Routine Cysticotomy and Flushing of the Cystic Duct in Patients with Low Risk of Common Duct Stones: Can It Be Beneficial?

IF 1.3 Q3 SURGERY
Minimally Invasive Surgery Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-07-11 DOI:10.1155/2017/9814389
Piera Leon, Fabiola Giudici, Antonio Sciuto, Francesco Corcione
{"title":"Routine Cysticotomy and Flushing of the Cystic Duct in Patients with Low Risk of Common Duct Stones: Can It Be Beneficial?","authors":"Piera Leon,&nbsp;Fabiola Giudici,&nbsp;Antonio Sciuto,&nbsp;Francesco Corcione","doi":"10.1155/2017/9814389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gallstone disease affects 15-20% of the general population and up to 20% of these patients present common bile duct stones.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This observational study reports our experience on routine cysticotomy and flushing of the cystic duct in patients with low risk of common duct stones.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We analyzed 731 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between September 2013 and September 2015.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were preoperatively stratified on the clinical risk; those presenting with low preoperative risk of common bile duct stones were referred to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy and routine cysticotomy with bile duct flushing. Patients presenting thick bile sludge, solid debrides, and/or increased tension of bile outflow underwent unplanned cholangiography. No intraoperative complications or conversion to open technique occurred. Average follow-up time was 22,8 months (range 12 to 37). Rate of retained ductal stones accounted for 0,3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Routine cysticotomy and bile flushing in our experience is a valid, simple, and not time consuming manoeuvre that can help decompressing and flushing CBD. Moreover, it is a valid tool for extending selective IOC approach in a focused manner. Further evaluations have to be conducted to evaluate risks and effectiveness of this manoeuvre.</p>","PeriodicalId":45110,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/9814389","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9814389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gallstone disease affects 15-20% of the general population and up to 20% of these patients present common bile duct stones.

Aim: This observational study reports our experience on routine cysticotomy and flushing of the cystic duct in patients with low risk of common duct stones.

Materials and methods: We analyzed 731 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between September 2013 and September 2015.

Results: Patients were preoperatively stratified on the clinical risk; those presenting with low preoperative risk of common bile duct stones were referred to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy and routine cysticotomy with bile duct flushing. Patients presenting thick bile sludge, solid debrides, and/or increased tension of bile outflow underwent unplanned cholangiography. No intraoperative complications or conversion to open technique occurred. Average follow-up time was 22,8 months (range 12 to 37). Rate of retained ductal stones accounted for 0,3%.

Conclusions: Routine cysticotomy and bile flushing in our experience is a valid, simple, and not time consuming manoeuvre that can help decompressing and flushing CBD. Moreover, it is a valid tool for extending selective IOC approach in a focused manner. Further evaluations have to be conducted to evaluate risks and effectiveness of this manoeuvre.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

常规膀胱切除术和胆总管冲洗对低风险的胆总管结石患者有益吗?
背景:胆结石疾病影响总人口的15-20%,其中高达20%的患者表现为胆总管结石。目的:本观察性研究报告了我们在低风险的总管结石患者中常规膀胱切除术和胆囊管冲洗的经验。材料和方法:我们分析了2013年9月至2015年9月期间接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的731例患者。结果:术前对患者进行临床风险分层;术前胆总管结石风险低的患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除术和常规胆囊切除术并胆管冲洗。出现厚胆汁污泥、固体碎屑和/或胆汁流出张力增加的患者应进行计划外胆管造影。无术中并发症或转开术。平均随访22.8个月(12 ~ 37个月)。导管结石潴留率为0.3%。结论:根据我们的经验,常规膀胱切除术和胆汁冲洗是一种有效、简单、不耗时的方法,可以帮助减压和冲洗CBD。此外,它还是以集中的方式扩展选择性IOC方法的有效工具。必须进行进一步的评估,以评估这种做法的风险和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信