Volumetric magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of uterine fibroids through abdominal scars: the impact of a scar patch on therapeutic efficacy and adverse effects.

Journal of therapeutic ultrasound Pub Date : 2017-08-17 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40349-017-0100-4
Bilgin Keserci, Nguyen Minh Duc
{"title":"Volumetric magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of uterine fibroids through abdominal scars: the impact of a scar patch on therapeutic efficacy and adverse effects.","authors":"Bilgin Keserci,&nbsp;Nguyen Minh Duc","doi":"10.1186/s40349-017-0100-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To retrospectively compare the treatment success, therapeutic efficacy, and adverse effects of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU) treatment for uterine fibroid patients with and without abdominal scars.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-six women who underwent treatment were divided into group 1 (patients with abdominal scars, which were covered with scar patches that prevents ultrasound energy from reaching the scar tissue immediately behind the patch) and group 2 (patients without abdominal scars). Non-perfused volume (NPV) ratios immediately after treatment, and fibroid volume reduction ratios and symptom severity scores (SSS) at the 6-months follow-up were assessed. All adverse effects were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean NPV ratios in groups 1 and 2 were 87.0 ± 14.1% and 91.5 ± 13.3%. At the 6-months follow-up, the fibroid volume reduction ratios in groups 1 and 2 were 0.45 ± 0.27 and 0.43 ± 0.21, and the corresponding improvement in mean transformed SSS were 0.7 ± 0.39 and 0.79 ± 0.28, respectively. No serious adverse effects were reported. The minor adverse effects encountered in this study are likely related to the temperature increase in the near-field of the ultrasound beam path, which inevitably leads to skin burns, or far-field heat absorption by distant bony structures (i.e., sciatic nerve symptoms), and are typically manifested inter-procedurally and resolved shortly thereafter.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings in this study suggest that the scar patch could be used safely and efficiently in MRgHIFU treatment for the patients with uterine fibroids and abdominal scars in the ultrasound beam path.</p>","PeriodicalId":90245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of therapeutic ultrasound","volume":"5 ","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40349-017-0100-4","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of therapeutic ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40349-017-0100-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Background: To retrospectively compare the treatment success, therapeutic efficacy, and adverse effects of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU) treatment for uterine fibroid patients with and without abdominal scars.

Methods: Seventy-six women who underwent treatment were divided into group 1 (patients with abdominal scars, which were covered with scar patches that prevents ultrasound energy from reaching the scar tissue immediately behind the patch) and group 2 (patients without abdominal scars). Non-perfused volume (NPV) ratios immediately after treatment, and fibroid volume reduction ratios and symptom severity scores (SSS) at the 6-months follow-up were assessed. All adverse effects were recorded.

Results: The mean NPV ratios in groups 1 and 2 were 87.0 ± 14.1% and 91.5 ± 13.3%. At the 6-months follow-up, the fibroid volume reduction ratios in groups 1 and 2 were 0.45 ± 0.27 and 0.43 ± 0.21, and the corresponding improvement in mean transformed SSS were 0.7 ± 0.39 and 0.79 ± 0.28, respectively. No serious adverse effects were reported. The minor adverse effects encountered in this study are likely related to the temperature increase in the near-field of the ultrasound beam path, which inevitably leads to skin burns, or far-field heat absorption by distant bony structures (i.e., sciatic nerve symptoms), and are typically manifested inter-procedurally and resolved shortly thereafter.

Conclusions: The findings in this study suggest that the scar patch could be used safely and efficiently in MRgHIFU treatment for the patients with uterine fibroids and abdominal scars in the ultrasound beam path.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

体积磁共振引导下经腹部疤痕的高强度聚焦超声子宫肌瘤消融:疤痕贴片对疗效和不良反应的影响
背景:回顾性比较磁共振引导下高强度聚焦超声(MRgHIFU)治疗伴有和不伴有腹部瘢痕的子宫肌瘤患者的治疗成功率、疗效及不良反应。方法:76例接受治疗的妇女分为1组(腹部瘢痕患者,覆盖疤痕贴片,防止超声能量直接到达贴片后面的疤痕组织)和2组(无腹部瘢痕患者)。评估治疗后立即的非灌注体积(NPV)比率,以及6个月随访时的肌瘤体积缩小比率和症状严重程度评分(SSS)。记录所有不良反应。结果:1、2组平均NPV比分别为87.0±14.1%、91.5±13.3%。随访6个月,1组和2组肌瘤体积缩小率分别为0.45±0.27和0.43±0.21,相应的平均转化SSS改善率分别为0.7±0.39和0.79±0.28。没有严重的不良反应报告。本研究中遇到的轻微不良反应可能与超声波束路径近场温度升高有关,这不可避免地导致皮肤烧伤,或远场热被远端骨结构吸收(即坐骨神经症状),并且通常在手术过程中表现出来,并在手术后不久就会消失。结论:瘢痕贴片可安全、有效地应用于超声路径内子宫肌瘤及腹部瘢痕患者的MRgHIFU治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信