Improving medicines reconciliation rates at Ashford and St. Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.

BMJ quality improvement reports Pub Date : 2017-06-08 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjquality-2017-000064
Reshmee Doolub
{"title":"Improving medicines reconciliation rates at Ashford and St. Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.","authors":"Reshmee Doolub","doi":"10.1136/bmjquality-2017-000064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medicines reconciliation is integral to patient safety, symptom control and reducing patient anxiety. During a 3-month period on the respiratory ward at St. Peter's Hospital, 54% of drug charts were not reconciled with pre-admission medicines at the point of discharge for admissions up to 17 days. Only 18% were reconciled within 24 hours of admission. 50% of drug charts were missing 0-2 pre-admission medicines and 50% were missing 3-5 pre-admission medicines. The most common medicines that were not reconciled included topical applications which included eye, ear, nasal and skin applications (14%); vitamins i.e. vitamin B12 and thiamine, analgesia, PRN inhalers (11% individually); antidepressants and lipid regulators (6% individually); amongst a range of other medications including antiplatelets, calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors and diuretics. Two interventions were carried out to improve the rate of medicines reconciliation onto hospital drug charts with pre-admission medicines. These were: 1) a green sticker placed in the medical notes by the pharmacist when drug charts were incomplete, which required a date and signature from the doctor when the drug chart had been reconciled 2) the placing of the loose medicines reconciliation record (a list of pre-admission medicines retrieved from a reliable source usually by the pharmacist) to the front of the drug chart. These measures were designed to alert the doctors that the drug chart was incomplete. After 2 PDSA cycles, the results showed positive outcomes. In 75% of the cases where the interventions were used, medicines reconciliation was complete at the point of discharge with 34% of drug charts reconciled within 24 hours of admission. Of the 25% of drug charts that were not reconciled despite the use of the interventions, 100% of them were missing 0-2 medicines however 0% were missing 3-5 medicines. This highlights that the interventions were effective in improving the rates of medicines reconciliation.</p>","PeriodicalId":91218,"journal":{"name":"BMJ quality improvement reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"e000064"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjquality-2017-000064","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ quality improvement reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality-2017-000064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Medicines reconciliation is integral to patient safety, symptom control and reducing patient anxiety. During a 3-month period on the respiratory ward at St. Peter's Hospital, 54% of drug charts were not reconciled with pre-admission medicines at the point of discharge for admissions up to 17 days. Only 18% were reconciled within 24 hours of admission. 50% of drug charts were missing 0-2 pre-admission medicines and 50% were missing 3-5 pre-admission medicines. The most common medicines that were not reconciled included topical applications which included eye, ear, nasal and skin applications (14%); vitamins i.e. vitamin B12 and thiamine, analgesia, PRN inhalers (11% individually); antidepressants and lipid regulators (6% individually); amongst a range of other medications including antiplatelets, calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors and diuretics. Two interventions were carried out to improve the rate of medicines reconciliation onto hospital drug charts with pre-admission medicines. These were: 1) a green sticker placed in the medical notes by the pharmacist when drug charts were incomplete, which required a date and signature from the doctor when the drug chart had been reconciled 2) the placing of the loose medicines reconciliation record (a list of pre-admission medicines retrieved from a reliable source usually by the pharmacist) to the front of the drug chart. These measures were designed to alert the doctors that the drug chart was incomplete. After 2 PDSA cycles, the results showed positive outcomes. In 75% of the cases where the interventions were used, medicines reconciliation was complete at the point of discharge with 34% of drug charts reconciled within 24 hours of admission. Of the 25% of drug charts that were not reconciled despite the use of the interventions, 100% of them were missing 0-2 medicines however 0% were missing 3-5 medicines. This highlights that the interventions were effective in improving the rates of medicines reconciliation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

提高阿什福德医院和圣彼得医院NHS基金会信托基金的药品对账率。
药物和解对于患者安全、症状控制和减少患者焦虑是不可或缺的。在圣彼得医院呼吸病房的3个月期间,54%的药物表在出院时与入院前的药物不一致,住院时间长达17天。只有18%的人在入院24小时内和解。50%的药物图表缺少0 ~ 2种入院前药物,50%的药物图表缺少3 ~ 5种入院前药物。不调和的最常见药物包括外用药物,包括眼、耳、鼻和皮肤药物(14%);维生素,即维生素B12和硫胺素,止痛剂,PRN吸入器(单个11%);抗抑郁药和脂质调节剂(单独6%);包括抗血小板,钙通道阻滞剂,ACE抑制剂和利尿剂。实施了两项干预措施,以提高住院前药物与医院药物图表的调和率。这些措施包括:1)当药物图表不完整时,药剂师在医疗记录上放置绿色贴纸,当药物图表已核对时,需要医生的日期和签名2)将松散的药物核对记录(通常由药剂师从可靠来源检索的入院前药物清单)放置在药物图表的前面。这些措施的目的是提醒医生药物表是不完整的。经过2个PDSA循环后,结果显示阳性。在使用干预措施的75%的病例中,药物核对在出院时完成,34%的药物图表在入院后24小时内核对完毕。尽管使用了干预措施,但仍未核对的25%的药物图表中,100%的人缺少0-2种药物,0%的人缺少3-5种药物。这突出表明,干预措施在提高药物和解率方面是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信