Introducing a post-operative proforma for elective lower limb arthroplasty patients - improving patient care and junior doctor confidence.

BMJ quality improvement reports Pub Date : 2017-06-08 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjquality-2017-000043
James Olivier, Michael Stoddart, Katie Miller, Robbie McLintock, Mark Dahill
{"title":"Introducing a post-operative proforma for elective lower limb arthroplasty patients - improving patient care and junior doctor confidence.","authors":"James Olivier,&nbsp;Michael Stoddart,&nbsp;Katie Miller,&nbsp;Robbie McLintock,&nbsp;Mark Dahill","doi":"10.1136/bmjquality-2017-000043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The assessment of post-operative patients is vital to identify early complications and ensure patient safety. Good clinical record keeping is essential for effective continuity of care and patient safety in the post-operative period. A group of foundation year 2 (FY2) doctors noted a disparity in levels of confidence and ability in performing this assessment. The aim of the project was to improve documentation and understanding of day one lower limb arthroplasty reviews by FY2 doctors. The Plan-Do-Study-Act model for continuous improvement was adopted from September 2015 to July 2016. A composite score comprising the twelve most important review parameters for documentation was used to score the quality of documentation on an ongoing basis. An electronic survey was completed by every FY2 rotating through the department. Interventions included registrar-led teaching sessions and an integrated review form placed in the medical notes. Further iterations of the proforma and further interventions were coordinated with the ward clerks, sisters, physiotherapists and senior clinicians. The baseline mean composite score was 6.3/12. Following implementation of a standardised proforma this score improved to 10.5 in those who had used the proforma, but 5.7 in those who hadn't. Electronic survey responses showed the proforma and teaching were effective in improving knowledge and understanding of post-operative reviews. The use of an integrated proforma in the medical notes and teaching it's use at induction, improves the documentation and understanding of day one post-operative reviews. Coordinating ward-based change across a cohort of FY2s, with involvement from the multidisciplinary team and management, affects sustained improvements in patient reviews.</p>","PeriodicalId":91218,"journal":{"name":"BMJ quality improvement reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"e000043"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjquality-2017-000043","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ quality improvement reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality-2017-000043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The assessment of post-operative patients is vital to identify early complications and ensure patient safety. Good clinical record keeping is essential for effective continuity of care and patient safety in the post-operative period. A group of foundation year 2 (FY2) doctors noted a disparity in levels of confidence and ability in performing this assessment. The aim of the project was to improve documentation and understanding of day one lower limb arthroplasty reviews by FY2 doctors. The Plan-Do-Study-Act model for continuous improvement was adopted from September 2015 to July 2016. A composite score comprising the twelve most important review parameters for documentation was used to score the quality of documentation on an ongoing basis. An electronic survey was completed by every FY2 rotating through the department. Interventions included registrar-led teaching sessions and an integrated review form placed in the medical notes. Further iterations of the proforma and further interventions were coordinated with the ward clerks, sisters, physiotherapists and senior clinicians. The baseline mean composite score was 6.3/12. Following implementation of a standardised proforma this score improved to 10.5 in those who had used the proforma, but 5.7 in those who hadn't. Electronic survey responses showed the proforma and teaching were effective in improving knowledge and understanding of post-operative reviews. The use of an integrated proforma in the medical notes and teaching it's use at induction, improves the documentation and understanding of day one post-operative reviews. Coordinating ward-based change across a cohort of FY2s, with involvement from the multidisciplinary team and management, affects sustained improvements in patient reviews.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

介绍选择性下肢关节置换术患者的术后形式-改善患者护理和初级医生的信心。
术后患者的评估对于发现早期并发症和确保患者安全至关重要。良好的临床记录保存对于术后护理的有效连续性和患者安全至关重要。一组基础二年级(FY2)的医生指出,在进行这项评估时,他们的信心和能力水平存在差异。该项目的目的是提高FY2医生对第一天下肢关节置换术回顾的记录和理解。2015年9月至2016年7月采用计划-执行-研究-行动模式持续改进。一个由十二个最重要的文件审查参数组成的综合分数被用来在持续的基础上对文件的质量进行评分。每个FY2部门轮流完成一项电子调查。干预措施包括由注册员领导的教学课程和放在医疗记录中的综合审查表。形式的进一步迭代和进一步的干预是与病房职员、姐妹、物理治疗师和高级临床医生协调的。基线平均综合评分为6.3/12。在实施标准化的形式后,使用形式的人得分提高到10.5,而没有使用形式的人得分提高到5.7。电子调查结果显示,形式和教学在提高对术后回顾的认识和理解方面是有效的。在医疗记录中使用综合形式,并在归纳时教授它的使用,提高了对术后第一天回顾的记录和理解。在多学科团队和管理层的参与下,协调跨FY2s队列的基于病房的变革,影响患者评价的持续改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信