[Comparative value of different respiratory function tests for the early diagnosis of the respiratory distress syndrome (author's transl)].

Le Poumon et le coeur Pub Date : 1982-01-01
Y L Guillot, J C Guérin, O Deschamps, J M Chavaillon, J F Mornex, J C Kalb
{"title":"[Comparative value of different respiratory function tests for the early diagnosis of the respiratory distress syndrome (author's transl)].","authors":"Y L Guillot,&nbsp;J C Guérin,&nbsp;O Deschamps,&nbsp;J M Chavaillon,&nbsp;J F Mornex,&nbsp;J C Kalb","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The diagnostic value of different respiratory function tests in the respiratory distress syndrome was compared in 5 groups of subjects: healthy non-smokers, asymptomatic smokers, patients with bronchitis affecting the large bronchi, asthmatic patients between attacks, and patients with emphysema. Indices measured were the forced expiratory volume per second (FEV1), mean expiratory flow between 25 and 75% of vital capacity (MEF 25-75%), maximum instantaneous flow at 25-50-75% of vital capacity, and peak flow (Vmax 25-50-75%, PF), residual volume, expiratory resistance volume, and the curve of the alveolar plateau of expired nitrogen. The Vmax 50% and the MEF 25-75% appear to be sufficiently sensitive indices of bronchial obstruction in current practice, the MEF 25-75% being simple to measure, and presenting the advantage of not requiring complicated equipment. The Vmax 25% and the respiratory resistance volume present wide inter-individual variations, and this, together with their lack of reproducibility, limit their value in exploratory tests in isolated cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":76107,"journal":{"name":"Le Poumon et le coeur","volume":" ","pages":"17-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Le Poumon et le coeur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The diagnostic value of different respiratory function tests in the respiratory distress syndrome was compared in 5 groups of subjects: healthy non-smokers, asymptomatic smokers, patients with bronchitis affecting the large bronchi, asthmatic patients between attacks, and patients with emphysema. Indices measured were the forced expiratory volume per second (FEV1), mean expiratory flow between 25 and 75% of vital capacity (MEF 25-75%), maximum instantaneous flow at 25-50-75% of vital capacity, and peak flow (Vmax 25-50-75%, PF), residual volume, expiratory resistance volume, and the curve of the alveolar plateau of expired nitrogen. The Vmax 50% and the MEF 25-75% appear to be sufficiently sensitive indices of bronchial obstruction in current practice, the MEF 25-75% being simple to measure, and presenting the advantage of not requiring complicated equipment. The Vmax 25% and the respiratory resistance volume present wide inter-individual variations, and this, together with their lack of reproducibility, limit their value in exploratory tests in isolated cases.

[不同呼吸功能检查对呼吸窘迫综合征早期诊断的比较价值[作者简介]。
比较5组健康非吸烟者、无症状吸烟者、支气管炎伴大支气管患者、发作间期哮喘患者和肺气肿患者不同呼吸功能检查对呼吸窘迫综合征的诊断价值。测定的指标有:用力呼气量每秒(FEV1)、平均呼气流量25 ~ 75%肺活量(MEF 25 ~ 75%)、最大瞬时流量25 ~ 50 ~ 75%肺活量、峰值流量(Vmax 25 ~ 50 ~ 75%, PF)、残气量、呼气阻力量、肺泡平台过期氮曲线。在目前的实践中,Vmax 50%和MEF 25-75%似乎是足够敏感的支气管阻塞指标,MEF 25-75%测量简单,并且具有不需要复杂设备的优点。Vmax 25%和呼吸阻力体积在个体间存在很大差异,加上它们缺乏可重复性,限制了它们在孤立病例的探索性试验中的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信