Taming the torrent: changes in flood protection at the Gürbe River (Switzerland) from the nineteenth century until today.

Water history Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-17 DOI:10.1007/s12685-022-00312-z
Melanie Salvisberg
{"title":"Taming the torrent: changes in flood protection at the Gürbe River (Switzerland) from the nineteenth century until today.","authors":"Melanie Salvisberg","doi":"10.1007/s12685-022-00312-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper analyses the flood protection history of the Gürbe River (Switzerland), a 29-km-long tributary of the Aare River. The upper reach of the river has the character of a mountain torrent and an exceptionally difficult flooding situation. For centuries, riparian communities were only able to take small protective measures. In the mid-nineteenth century, the flood protection strategy changed: between 1855 and 1881, the Gürbe River was channelised and stabilised by a torrent control system. Although the situation improved, flood damage could not be prevented as intended. Therefore, dozens of consecutive projects were implemented-without interruption until today. This paper examines why small watercourses are useful case studies, which protection measures were taken at the Gürbe River, how they corresponded to the prevailing flood protection philosophy, whether they were linked to floods and how flood protection influenced land use. The Gürbe regulation, its consecutive projects and the connected drainages had far-reaching effects: They allowed an intensive agricultural use of the valley floor, the construction of roads, a railway, and new settlements. Consequently, the social and economic pressure on the hazard area increased steadily over the decades. It created a vicious circle: the more that protective structures were built, the more important and profitable flood prevention became, and the more structures were raised. A reevaluation finally took place in the late twentieth century, based on increasing environmental awareness, and fostered by a catastrophic flood. However, the implementation of new projects proved to be difficult due to conflicting interests.</p>","PeriodicalId":75314,"journal":{"name":"Water history","volume":"14 3","pages":"355-377"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9715449/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12685-022-00312-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyses the flood protection history of the Gürbe River (Switzerland), a 29-km-long tributary of the Aare River. The upper reach of the river has the character of a mountain torrent and an exceptionally difficult flooding situation. For centuries, riparian communities were only able to take small protective measures. In the mid-nineteenth century, the flood protection strategy changed: between 1855 and 1881, the Gürbe River was channelised and stabilised by a torrent control system. Although the situation improved, flood damage could not be prevented as intended. Therefore, dozens of consecutive projects were implemented-without interruption until today. This paper examines why small watercourses are useful case studies, which protection measures were taken at the Gürbe River, how they corresponded to the prevailing flood protection philosophy, whether they were linked to floods and how flood protection influenced land use. The Gürbe regulation, its consecutive projects and the connected drainages had far-reaching effects: They allowed an intensive agricultural use of the valley floor, the construction of roads, a railway, and new settlements. Consequently, the social and economic pressure on the hazard area increased steadily over the decades. It created a vicious circle: the more that protective structures were built, the more important and profitable flood prevention became, and the more structures were raised. A reevaluation finally took place in the late twentieth century, based on increasing environmental awareness, and fostered by a catastrophic flood. However, the implementation of new projects proved to be difficult due to conflicting interests.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

驯服激流:从19世纪到今天,格河(瑞士)的防洪变化。
本文分析了阿勒河的一条29公里长的支流——瑞士g河(rbe River)的防洪历史。河流的上游具有山洪的特征,洪水泛滥的情况异常困难。几个世纪以来,河岸社区只能采取很小的保护措施。在19世纪中期,防洪策略发生了变化:1855年至1881年间,河(grbe River)被一个激流控制系统疏通并稳定了下来。虽然情况有所改善,但洪水的破坏未能如期防止。因此,连续实施了数十个项目,直到今天都没有中断。本文探讨了为什么小水道是有用的案例研究,在g rbe河采取了哪些保护措施,它们如何与流行的防洪理念相对应,它们是否与洪水有关,以及洪水保护如何影响土地利用。g rbe条例及其连续的项目和相连的排水系统产生了深远的影响:它们允许对谷底进行集约化农业利用,修建公路、铁路和新的定居点。因此,几十年来,灾害地区的社会和经济压力稳步增加。这就形成了一个恶性循环:防护设施建得越多,防洪就变得越重要,也就越有利可图,于是建筑就建得越多。在20世纪后期,基于日益增强的环保意识和一场灾难性洪水的推动下,最终发生了一次重新评估。然而,由于利益冲突,新项目的实施被证明是困难的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信