Comparative associations between anthropometric and bioelectric impedance analysis derived adiposity measures with blood pressure and hypertension in India: a cross-sectional analysis.

Q1 Medicine
BMC Obesity Pub Date : 2017-12-01 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40608-017-0173-1
Kevin Y Taing, Michael E Farkouh, Rahim Moineddin, Jack V Tu, Prabhat Jha
{"title":"Comparative associations between anthropometric and bioelectric impedance analysis derived adiposity measures with blood pressure and hypertension in India: a cross-sectional analysis.","authors":"Kevin Y Taing,&nbsp;Michael E Farkouh,&nbsp;Rahim Moineddin,&nbsp;Jack V Tu,&nbsp;Prabhat Jha","doi":"10.1186/s40608-017-0173-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The utility of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) derived adiposity measures as compared to anthropometric measures for the assessment of adiposity-related health risk is not clear. We aimed to clarify the relationships of BIA and anthropometric derived adipose measures with blood pressure and hypertension, and to compare the discriminative ability of the respective measures for hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used baseline data collected between 2015 and 2016 from the Indian Study on Health of Adults (ISHA), an ongoing population based cohort study in India (<i>N</i> = 5990; age 30-69 years). We examined and compared the associations and discriminative ability between anthropometric (body mass index, waist circumference, hip circumference, waist-hip ratio, waist-height ratio) and BIA (whole body and trunk fat percentage) derived adiposity measures with blood pressure components (systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, pulse pressure, mean arterial pressure, mid-blood pressure) and hypertension.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regardless of whether the adiposity measure was derived from BIA or anthropometry, all were strongly and positively associated with blood pressure and hypertension. For both men and women, the magnitude of association of BIA measures with blood pressure and hypertension were comparable to those of anthropometric measures. Further, the ability of BIA derived adiposity measures to distinguish between those with and without hypertension was similar to the discriminative ability of anthropometric measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As compared to simple anthropometric measures, BIA derived estimates of adiposity provide no apparent advantage in the assessment of blood pressure and hypertension. The observed similarities between adiposity measures suggest that simple anthropometrics may be sufficient to assess adiposity and adiposity-related risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":37440,"journal":{"name":"BMC Obesity","volume":"4 ","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40608-017-0173-1","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40608-017-0173-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: The utility of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) derived adiposity measures as compared to anthropometric measures for the assessment of adiposity-related health risk is not clear. We aimed to clarify the relationships of BIA and anthropometric derived adipose measures with blood pressure and hypertension, and to compare the discriminative ability of the respective measures for hypertension.

Methods: We used baseline data collected between 2015 and 2016 from the Indian Study on Health of Adults (ISHA), an ongoing population based cohort study in India (N = 5990; age 30-69 years). We examined and compared the associations and discriminative ability between anthropometric (body mass index, waist circumference, hip circumference, waist-hip ratio, waist-height ratio) and BIA (whole body and trunk fat percentage) derived adiposity measures with blood pressure components (systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, pulse pressure, mean arterial pressure, mid-blood pressure) and hypertension.

Results: Regardless of whether the adiposity measure was derived from BIA or anthropometry, all were strongly and positively associated with blood pressure and hypertension. For both men and women, the magnitude of association of BIA measures with blood pressure and hypertension were comparable to those of anthropometric measures. Further, the ability of BIA derived adiposity measures to distinguish between those with and without hypertension was similar to the discriminative ability of anthropometric measures.

Conclusions: As compared to simple anthropometric measures, BIA derived estimates of adiposity provide no apparent advantage in the assessment of blood pressure and hypertension. The observed similarities between adiposity measures suggest that simple anthropometrics may be sufficient to assess adiposity and adiposity-related risks.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在印度,人体测量和生物电阻抗分析得出的肥胖测量与血压和高血压的比较关联:一项横断面分析。
背景:与人体测量法相比,生物电阻抗分析(BIA)衍生的肥胖测量法在评估肥胖相关健康风险方面的效用尚不清楚。我们的目的是澄清BIA和人体测量衍生脂肪测量与血压和高血压的关系,并比较各自测量对高血压的判别能力。方法:我们使用了2015年至2016年从印度成人健康研究(ISHA)收集的基线数据,这是一项正在印度进行的基于人群的队列研究(N = 5990;年龄30-69岁)。我们检查并比较了人体测量(体重指数、腰围、臀围、腰臀比、腰高比)和BIA(全身和躯干脂肪百分比)与血压成分(收缩压、舒张压、脉压、平均动脉压、中血压)和高血压之间的关联和判别能力。结果:无论肥胖测量是来自BIA还是人体测量,都与血压和高血压呈强烈正相关。对于男性和女性,BIA测量与血压和高血压的关联程度与人体测量测量相当。此外,BIA衍生的脂肪测量区分高血压患者和非高血压患者的能力与人体测量的区分能力相似。结论:与简单的人体测量测量相比,BIA得出的肥胖估计在评估血压和高血压方面没有明显的优势。观察到的肥胖测量之间的相似性表明,简单的人体测量可能足以评估肥胖和肥胖相关的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Obesity
BMC Obesity Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Cesation (2019). Information not localized.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信