Selection criteria for wet-nurses: Ancient recommendations that survived across time.

Q2 Nursing
Breastfeeding Review Pub Date : 2016-11-01
Virginia Thorley, Tomasz Sioda
{"title":"Selection criteria for wet-nurses: Ancient recommendations that survived across time.","authors":"Virginia Thorley,&nbsp;Tomasz Sioda","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article will describe the content of the key criteria for the selection of wet nurses that persisted across time and the authors who transmitted this advice. Where relevant, it will include variations, such as additional recommendations or a different weighting being given to one or other criterion by a particular author. The focus is on the selection of a wet nurse for the employer's baby. The factors that led a woman to enter this employment and the consequences for her own baby will not be addressed here as they will be discussed elsewhere. \n\n The article is an historical one, drawing on primary sources, where possible, and important secondary sources. \n\n Guidelines for the selection of wet-nurses have existed from antiquity to the early 20th century. The key recommendations managed to survive across the centuries because they were considered useful by influential ancient and Early Modern and later authors who passed them on through copying and translations. It is tempting to assume that the prescriptive advice was followed by physicians and mothers. However, the discussion will raise doubts about whether the criteria were adhered to by physicians and parents, particularly when wet nurses were in scarce supply.</p>","PeriodicalId":35568,"journal":{"name":"Breastfeeding Review","volume":"24 3","pages":"13-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breastfeeding Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article will describe the content of the key criteria for the selection of wet nurses that persisted across time and the authors who transmitted this advice. Where relevant, it will include variations, such as additional recommendations or a different weighting being given to one or other criterion by a particular author. The focus is on the selection of a wet nurse for the employer's baby. The factors that led a woman to enter this employment and the consequences for her own baby will not be addressed here as they will be discussed elsewhere. The article is an historical one, drawing on primary sources, where possible, and important secondary sources. Guidelines for the selection of wet-nurses have existed from antiquity to the early 20th century. The key recommendations managed to survive across the centuries because they were considered useful by influential ancient and Early Modern and later authors who passed them on through copying and translations. It is tempting to assume that the prescriptive advice was followed by physicians and mothers. However, the discussion will raise doubts about whether the criteria were adhered to by physicians and parents, particularly when wet nurses were in scarce supply.

奶妈的选择标准:历久弥新的古老建议。
这篇文章将描述的内容的关键标准的选择奶妈,持续的时间和作者谁传播这一建议。在相关的情况下,它将包括变化,例如额外的建议或由特定作者给予一个或其他标准的不同权重。重点是为雇主的婴儿挑选奶妈。导致一名妇女从事这项工作的因素以及对她自己的孩子的影响将在其他地方讨论,在这里不讨论。这篇文章是一篇历史性的文章,在可能的情况下,借鉴了第一手资料,以及重要的二手资料。选择奶妈的指导方针从古代一直存在到20世纪初。几个世纪以来,这些重要的建议得以保存下来,因为它们被有影响力的古代和早期现代以及后来的作者认为是有用的,他们通过复制和翻译将它们传递下去。人们很容易认为医生和母亲们都遵循了这些规定性的建议。然而,讨论将引起对医生和家长是否遵守标准的质疑,特别是在奶妈稀缺的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Breastfeeding Review
Breastfeeding Review Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信