Evaluating Anti-Infective Drugs in the Resistant Pathogen Setting: Can we Use External Controls?

Scott R Evans, John Powers
{"title":"Evaluating Anti-Infective Drugs in the Resistant Pathogen Setting: Can we Use External Controls?","authors":"Scott R Evans,&nbsp;John Powers","doi":"10.1515/scid-2016-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Decreased efficacy of antibiotics due to resistant pathogens has created a need for the development of more effective medical interventions. Despite the increasing prevalence of pathogens resistant to one or more drugs, identifying and enrolling participants into clinical trials that evaluate new interventions for the treatment of some diseases can be challenging given the low prevalence of disease in which there are no effective treatments. Thus researchers might be tempted to consider externally-controlled trials that may allow for a reduction of the necessary number of prospectively-identified trial participants, thus easing recruitment burden and resulting in more timely trial completion relative to randomized controlled trials. We discuss advantages and disadvantages in externally controlled trials and review requirements for a valid externally-controlled trial. As ECTs are subject to the bias of observational studies, the criteria for a valid ECT should be carefully evaluated before these designs are implemented. Given considerable variation in study results in the resistant pathogen setting, the lack of information on important patient characteristics that may confound estimates of treatment effects, as well as the improvements in medical practice and evolving antibiotic resistance, the use of ECTs in the resistant pathogen setting, is not recommended. ECTs should be should be limited to specific situations where superiority of the effect of the new intervention is dramatic, the usual course of the disease highly predictable, the endpoints are objective (e.g., all-cause mortality) and the impact of baseline and treatment variables on outcomes is well characterized. Given that the resistant pathogen setting does not satisfy these criteria, we conclude that that randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate new treatments for resistant pathogens. Innovative approaches to trial design that may ease recruitment burden while evaluating the benefits and harms of new treatments are being developed and utilized.</p>","PeriodicalId":74867,"journal":{"name":"Statistical communications in infectious diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/scid-2016-0003","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical communications in infectious diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/scid-2016-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Decreased efficacy of antibiotics due to resistant pathogens has created a need for the development of more effective medical interventions. Despite the increasing prevalence of pathogens resistant to one or more drugs, identifying and enrolling participants into clinical trials that evaluate new interventions for the treatment of some diseases can be challenging given the low prevalence of disease in which there are no effective treatments. Thus researchers might be tempted to consider externally-controlled trials that may allow for a reduction of the necessary number of prospectively-identified trial participants, thus easing recruitment burden and resulting in more timely trial completion relative to randomized controlled trials. We discuss advantages and disadvantages in externally controlled trials and review requirements for a valid externally-controlled trial. As ECTs are subject to the bias of observational studies, the criteria for a valid ECT should be carefully evaluated before these designs are implemented. Given considerable variation in study results in the resistant pathogen setting, the lack of information on important patient characteristics that may confound estimates of treatment effects, as well as the improvements in medical practice and evolving antibiotic resistance, the use of ECTs in the resistant pathogen setting, is not recommended. ECTs should be should be limited to specific situations where superiority of the effect of the new intervention is dramatic, the usual course of the disease highly predictable, the endpoints are objective (e.g., all-cause mortality) and the impact of baseline and treatment variables on outcomes is well characterized. Given that the resistant pathogen setting does not satisfy these criteria, we conclude that that randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate new treatments for resistant pathogens. Innovative approaches to trial design that may ease recruitment burden while evaluating the benefits and harms of new treatments are being developed and utilized.

在耐药病原体环境下评估抗感染药物:我们可以使用外部控制吗?
由于耐药病原体导致抗生素疗效下降,因此需要开发更有效的医疗干预措施。尽管对一种或多种药物具有耐药性的病原体越来越普遍,但鉴于没有有效治疗方法的疾病发病率较低,确定和招募参与者参加评估某些疾病治疗新干预措施的临床试验可能具有挑战性。因此,研究人员可能会倾向于考虑外部对照试验,这可能会减少必要数量的前瞻性确定的试验参与者,从而减轻招募负担,并导致相对于随机对照试验更及时地完成试验。我们讨论了外部对照试验的优点和缺点,并回顾了有效的外部对照试验的要求。由于ECT受观察性研究的偏倚影响,在实施这些设计之前,应仔细评估有效ECT的标准。鉴于在耐药病原体环境下的研究结果存在相当大的差异,缺乏关于可能混淆治疗效果估计的重要患者特征的信息,以及医疗实践的改进和抗生素耐药性的发展,不建议在耐药病原体环境中使用ECTs。ECTs应限于以下特定情况:新干预措施的效果显著,通常的病程高度可预测,终点是客观的(例如,全因死亡率),基线和治疗变量对结果的影响已得到很好的表征。鉴于耐药病原体环境不满足这些标准,我们得出结论,需要随机临床试验来评估耐药病原体的新治疗方法。正在开发和利用创新的试验设计方法,这些方法可以减轻招募负担,同时评估新疗法的利弊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信