Evaluation of Effective Dashboards: Key Concepts and Criteria.

The open medical informatics journal Pub Date : 2017-10-24 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874431101711010052

Mahtab Karami, Mostafa Langarizadeh, Mansoor Fatehi

{"title":"Evaluation of Effective Dashboards: Key Concepts and Criteria.","authors":"Mahtab Karami, Mostafa Langarizadeh, Mansoor Fatehi","doi":"10.2174/1874431101711010052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study is to offer appropriate criteria to evaluate effective dashboards for healthcare organizations.Method: In a Delphi study, a team of information technology consultants were asked to determine a set of user interface requirements for evaluating, building or selecting the dashboard. In the first round, a list of main features or criteria to be used was determined based on the panel's rating,.Results: In this study, it was revealed that a set of key criteria for evaluating the dashboards can be used for all types of dashboards. These criteria were classified into 7 main categories including user customization, knowledge discovery, security, information delivery, alerting, visual design, and integration and system connectivity.Conclusion: Choosing good criteria for selecting effective dashboards for healthcare organizations is very critical because these organizations follow a data-intensive and technology-driven environment. This study revealed the importance of key criteria which can guarantee development of an evaluation checklist.","PeriodicalId":88331,"journal":{"name":"The open medical informatics journal","volume":"11 ","pages":"52-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874431101711010052","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open medical informatics journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874431101711010052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 24

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to offer appropriate criteria to evaluate effective dashboards for healthcare organizations.

Method: In a Delphi study, a team of information technology consultants were asked to determine a set of user interface requirements for evaluating, building or selecting the dashboard. In the first round, a list of main features or criteria to be used was determined based on the panel's rating,.

Results: In this study, it was revealed that a set of key criteria for evaluating the dashboards can be used for all types of dashboards. These criteria were classified into 7 main categories including user customization, knowledge discovery, security, information delivery, alerting, visual design, and integration and system connectivity.

Conclusion: Choosing good criteria for selecting effective dashboards for healthcare organizations is very critical because these organizations follow a data-intensive and technology-driven environment. This study revealed the importance of key criteria which can guarantee development of an evaluation checklist.

查看原文本刊更多论文

有效仪表板的评估:关键概念和标准。

目的:本研究的目的是提供适当的标准来评估医疗保健组织的有效仪表板。方法:在德尔福研究中，一组信息技术顾问被要求确定一组用于评估、构建或选择仪表板的用户界面需求。在第一轮中，将根据评委会的评分确定主要特征或使用标准的清单。结果:在本研究中，揭示了一套评估仪表板的关键标准，可用于所有类型的仪表板。这些标准分为7个主要类别，包括用户定制、知识发现、安全性、信息传递、警报、视觉设计、集成和系统连接。结论:为医疗保健组织选择有效的仪表板选择良好的标准非常关键，因为这些组织遵循数据密集型和技术驱动的环境。这项研究揭示了关键标准的重要性，这些标准可以保证评估清单的发展。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

The open medical informatics journal

自引率

0.00%

发文量