Impact of Post-Exodontia Bleeding in Cardiovascular Patients: A New Classification Proposal.

The Open Cardiovascular Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2017-09-30 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874192401711010102
T Lillis, M Didagelos, L Lillis, C Theodoridis, H Karvounis, A Ziakas
{"title":"Impact of Post-Exodontia Bleeding in Cardiovascular Patients: A New Classification Proposal.","authors":"T Lillis,&nbsp;M Didagelos,&nbsp;L Lillis,&nbsp;C Theodoridis,&nbsp;H Karvounis,&nbsp;A Ziakas","doi":"10.2174/1874192401711010102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exodontia (dental extraction), being the most frequent minor surgical procedure in the general population, inevitably involves a large number of patients on antithrombotic medication. Current experience shows that there is a degree of confusion in managing these patients.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>Post-exodontia bleeding, a natural consequence of every dental extraction with no or minor clinical significance in the vast majority of cases, often appears to be of major concern to both patients and healthcare practitioners (dentists or physicians), either because of the alarming nature of oral bleeding itself or because of the distorted perception about its importance. These concerns are enhanced by the lack of a universal standardized definition of post-exodontia bleeding and by the fact that all currently available post-exodontia bleeding definitions bear intrinsic limitations and tend to overestimate its clinical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In order to overcome the aforementioned issues, this article presents an overview of post-extraction bleeding and proposes a classification, based on the well-recognized Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) bleeding definition, aiming at reducing heterogeneity in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":504447,"journal":{"name":"The Open Cardiovascular Medicine Journal","volume":"11 ","pages":"102-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874192401711010102","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Cardiovascular Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874192401711010102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Exodontia (dental extraction), being the most frequent minor surgical procedure in the general population, inevitably involves a large number of patients on antithrombotic medication. Current experience shows that there is a degree of confusion in managing these patients.

Description: Post-exodontia bleeding, a natural consequence of every dental extraction with no or minor clinical significance in the vast majority of cases, often appears to be of major concern to both patients and healthcare practitioners (dentists or physicians), either because of the alarming nature of oral bleeding itself or because of the distorted perception about its importance. These concerns are enhanced by the lack of a universal standardized definition of post-exodontia bleeding and by the fact that all currently available post-exodontia bleeding definitions bear intrinsic limitations and tend to overestimate its clinical significance.

Conclusion: In order to overcome the aforementioned issues, this article presents an overview of post-extraction bleeding and proposes a classification, based on the well-recognized Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) bleeding definition, aiming at reducing heterogeneity in this field.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

心血管患者外牙后出血的影响:一个新的分类建议。
背景:拔牙是普通人群中最常见的小外科手术,不可避免地涉及大量服用抗血栓药物的患者。目前的经验表明,在管理这些患者时存在一定程度的混乱。描述:拔牙后出血是每次拔牙的自然结果,在绝大多数情况下没有或很少有临床意义,通常是患者和保健从业人员(牙医或医生)主要关注的问题,要么是因为口腔出血本身的惊人性质,要么是因为对其重要性的扭曲认知。由于缺乏对外牙后出血的通用标准定义,以及目前所有可获得的外牙后出血定义都具有内在局限性,并且往往高估了其临床意义,因此这些问题更加突出。结论:为了克服上述问题,本文介绍了拔牙后出血的概况,并根据公认的出血学术研究联盟(BARC)出血定义提出了一种分类,旨在减少该领域的异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信