Short Term Outcomes of Open and Minimally Invasive Approaches to Segmental Colectomy for Benign Colovesical Fistula.

Surgery Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-11-23 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/9242813
Zhobin Yeganeh, Dustin Hau Huynh, Anthony Paul Kopatsis, Anthony Kopatsis
{"title":"Short Term Outcomes of Open and Minimally Invasive Approaches to Segmental Colectomy for Benign Colovesical Fistula.","authors":"Zhobin Yeganeh,&nbsp;Dustin Hau Huynh,&nbsp;Anthony Paul Kopatsis,&nbsp;Anthony Kopatsis","doi":"10.1155/2022/9242813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We speculated that a minimally invasive (MIS) colectomy for colovesical fistula is associated with less morbidity compared to an open colectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multivariate analysis using logistic regression was used to investigate the outcomes of patients who underwent colectomy for benign colovesical fistula during 2012-2017 by surgical approach using the NSQIP database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 748 patients underwent partial colectomy for benign colovesical fistula during 2012-2017. Surgeons used the MIS approach in 72.7% of operations, with a conversion rate of 13.1%. The MIS approach was associated with lower morbidity (27.4% vs. 43.1%, AOR: 0.46, <i>P</i>=0.02) compared to the open approach. The mean operation duration was longer in MIS operations compared to open (225 min vs. 201 min, <i>P</i> < 0.01). The robotic approach to colectomy showed no significant difference in morbidity (28.4% vs. 27.2%, <i>P</i>=0.77) but a decrease in conversion rate (8.1% vs. 13.8%, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and an increase in operation length (249 min vs. 222 min, mean difference: 27 min, <i>P</i> < 0.01) compared to a laparoscopic approach. There was no significant difference in the anastomotic leak rate between MIS and open approaches (3.7% vs. 5.4%, <i>P</i>=0.14) and between laparoscopic and robotic approaches (2.8% vs. 3.8%, <i>P</i>=0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a 72.7% utilization rate of MIS approach to colectomy for benign colovesical fistula in the NSQIP hospitals with a 13.6% conversion rate. Patients with MIS approach had significantly lower morbidity compared to open. A robotic approach to partial colectomy has the same morbidity risk with a decreased conversion rate compared to laparoscopic approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":30584,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Research and Practice","volume":"2022 ","pages":"9242813"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9712019/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9242813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We speculated that a minimally invasive (MIS) colectomy for colovesical fistula is associated with less morbidity compared to an open colectomy.

Methods: Multivariate analysis using logistic regression was used to investigate the outcomes of patients who underwent colectomy for benign colovesical fistula during 2012-2017 by surgical approach using the NSQIP database.

Results: We identified 748 patients underwent partial colectomy for benign colovesical fistula during 2012-2017. Surgeons used the MIS approach in 72.7% of operations, with a conversion rate of 13.1%. The MIS approach was associated with lower morbidity (27.4% vs. 43.1%, AOR: 0.46, P=0.02) compared to the open approach. The mean operation duration was longer in MIS operations compared to open (225 min vs. 201 min, P < 0.01). The robotic approach to colectomy showed no significant difference in morbidity (28.4% vs. 27.2%, P=0.77) but a decrease in conversion rate (8.1% vs. 13.8%, P < 0.01) and an increase in operation length (249 min vs. 222 min, mean difference: 27 min, P < 0.01) compared to a laparoscopic approach. There was no significant difference in the anastomotic leak rate between MIS and open approaches (3.7% vs. 5.4%, P=0.14) and between laparoscopic and robotic approaches (2.8% vs. 3.8%, P=0.99).

Conclusions: We found a 72.7% utilization rate of MIS approach to colectomy for benign colovesical fistula in the NSQIP hospitals with a 13.6% conversion rate. Patients with MIS approach had significantly lower morbidity compared to open. A robotic approach to partial colectomy has the same morbidity risk with a decreased conversion rate compared to laparoscopic approach.

开放性和微创结肠切除术治疗良性结肠瘘的短期疗效。
背景:我们推测,与开放式结肠切除术相比,微创结肠切除术治疗结肠膀胱瘘的发病率更低。方法:采用logistic回归多因素分析方法,利用NSQIP数据库,对2012-2017年经外科入路行结肠切除术治疗良性结肠膀胱瘘患者的预后进行调查。结果:在2012-2017年期间,我们确定了748例因良性结肠膀胱瘘接受部分结肠切除术的患者。72.7%的手术采用MIS入路,转换率为13.1%。与开放入路相比,MIS入路的发病率较低(27.4% vs. 43.1%, AOR: 0.46, P=0.02)。MIS组的平均手术时间较开放组长(225 min vs. 201 min, P < 0.01)。与腹腔镜入路相比,机器人入路结肠切除术的发病率无显著差异(28.4%比27.2%,P=0.77),但转换率下降(8.1%比13.8%,P < 0.01),手术时间增加(249分钟比222分钟,平均差27分钟,P < 0.01)。MIS与开放式入路吻合口漏率(3.7% vs. 5.4%, P=0.14)、腹腔镜与机器人入路吻合口漏率(2.8% vs. 3.8%, P=0.99)差异无统计学意义。结论:在NSQIP医院,MIS入路结肠切除术治疗良性结肠瘘的使用率为72.7%,转换率为13.6%。与开放入路相比,MIS入路患者的发病率明显降低。机器人入路结肠部分切除术与腹腔镜入路相比具有相同的发病率风险和降低的转换率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Surgery Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for surgeons and the surgical research community. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on clinical and laboratory research relevant to surgical practice and teaching, with an emphasis on findings directly affecting surgical management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信