Effect of Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity Intervention on Improving Dementia Family Caregiver Physical Function: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Carol J Farran, Caryn D Etkin, Amy Eisenstein, Olimpia Paun, Kumar B Rajan, Cynthia M Castro Sweet, Judith J McCann, Lisa L Barnes, Raj C Shah, Denis A Evans
{"title":"Effect of Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity Intervention on Improving Dementia Family Caregiver Physical Function: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Carol J Farran, Caryn D Etkin, Amy Eisenstein, Olimpia Paun, Kumar B Rajan, Cynthia M Castro Sweet, Judith J McCann, Lisa L Barnes, Raj C Shah, Denis A Evans","doi":"10.4172/2161-0460.1000253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) affect more than five million Americans and their family caregivers. Caregiving creates challenges, may contribute to decreased caregiver health and is associated with $9.7 billion of caregiver health care costs. The purpose of this 12 month randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to examine if the Enhancing Physical Activity Intervention (EPAI), a moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) treatment group, versus the Caregiver Skill Building Intervention (CSBI) control, would have greater: (1) MVPA adherence; and (2) physical function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Caregivers were randomly assigned to EPAI or CSBI (N=211). MVPA was assessed using a self-report measure; and physical function was objectively assessed using two measures. Intention-to-treat analyses used descriptive, categorical and generalized estimating equations (GEE), with an exchangeable working correlation matrix and a log link, to examine main effects and interactions in change of MVPA and physical function over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 12 months, EPAI significantly increased MVPA (<i>p</i>=<0.001) and number of steps (<i>p</i>=< .01); maintained stable caregiving hours and use of formal services; while CSBI increased hours of caregiving (<i>p</i>=<0.001) and used more formal services (<i>p</i>=<0.02). Qualitative physical function data indicated that approximately 50% of caregivers had difficulties completing physical function tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The EPAI had a stronger 12 month effect on caregiver MVPA and physical function, as well as maintaining stability of caregiving hours and formal service use; while CSBI increased caregiving hours and use of formal services. A study limitation included greater EPAI versus CSBI attrition. Future directions are proposed for dementia family caregiver physical activity research.</p>","PeriodicalId":15013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease & Parkinsonism","volume":"6 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5526207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease & Parkinsonism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0460.1000253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) affect more than five million Americans and their family caregivers. Caregiving creates challenges, may contribute to decreased caregiver health and is associated with $9.7 billion of caregiver health care costs. The purpose of this 12 month randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to examine if the Enhancing Physical Activity Intervention (EPAI), a moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) treatment group, versus the Caregiver Skill Building Intervention (CSBI) control, would have greater: (1) MVPA adherence; and (2) physical function.

Methods: Caregivers were randomly assigned to EPAI or CSBI (N=211). MVPA was assessed using a self-report measure; and physical function was objectively assessed using two measures. Intention-to-treat analyses used descriptive, categorical and generalized estimating equations (GEE), with an exchangeable working correlation matrix and a log link, to examine main effects and interactions in change of MVPA and physical function over time.

Results: At 12 months, EPAI significantly increased MVPA (p=<0.001) and number of steps (p=< .01); maintained stable caregiving hours and use of formal services; while CSBI increased hours of caregiving (p=<0.001) and used more formal services (p=<0.02). Qualitative physical function data indicated that approximately 50% of caregivers had difficulties completing physical function tests.

Conclusion: The EPAI had a stronger 12 month effect on caregiver MVPA and physical function, as well as maintaining stability of caregiving hours and formal service use; while CSBI increased caregiving hours and use of formal services. A study limitation included greater EPAI versus CSBI attrition. Future directions are proposed for dementia family caregiver physical activity research.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

中度至剧烈体育活动干预对改善痴呆家庭照顾者身体功能的影响:一项随机对照试验。
目的:阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆(ADRD)影响了超过500万美国人及其家庭照顾者。照顾带来挑战,可能导致照顾者健康状况下降,并与97亿美元的照顾者保健费用有关。这项为期12个月的随机临床试验(RCT)的目的是检查增强体力活动干预(EPAI),一个中等到剧烈的体力活动(MVPA)治疗组,与护理人员技能建设干预(CSBI)对照组相比,是否有更大的:(1)MVPA依从性;(2)物理功能。方法:211名护理人员随机分为EPAI组和CSBI组。MVPA采用自我报告法评估;用两种方法客观评价身体机能。意向治疗分析使用描述性,分类和广义估计方程(GEE),具有可交换的工作相关矩阵和日志链接,以检查MVPA和物理功能随时间变化的主要影响和相互作用。结果:在12个月时,EPAI显著提高MVPA (p=p=< 0.01);维持稳定的护理时间和使用正规服务;结论:EPAI对照顾者MVPA、身体功能、维持照顾时间和正式服务使用的稳定性有较强的12个月影响;而CSBI则增加了看护时间和使用正规服务。研究的局限性包括EPAI与CSBI之间更大的损失率。提出了痴呆家庭照护者身体活动研究的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信