Comparison between three glass fiber post cementation techniques.

Annali di stomatologia Pub Date : 2017-07-03 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.029
Guido Migliau, Luca Piccoli, Stefano Di Carlo, Giorgio Pompa, Laith Konstantinos Besharat, Marco Dolci
{"title":"Comparison between three glass fiber post cementation techniques.","authors":"Guido Migliau,&nbsp;Luca Piccoli,&nbsp;Stefano Di Carlo,&nbsp;Giorgio Pompa,&nbsp;Laith Konstantinos Besharat,&nbsp;Marco Dolci","doi":"10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this experimental study was to compare the traditional cement systems with those of the latest generation, to assess if indeed these could represent of viable substitutes in the cementation of indirect restorations, and in the specific case of endodontic posts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The assessment of the validity of the cementing methods was performed according to the test of the push-out, conducted on sections obtained from the roots of treated teeth. The samples were divided into three groups. Group A (10 samples): etching for 30 seconds with 37% orthophosphoric acid (Superlux-Thixo-etch-DMG) combined with a dual-curing adhesive system (LuxaBond-Total Etch-DMG), dual-cured resin-composite cement (LuxaCore-DMG) and glass fiber posts (LuxaPost-DMG). Group B (10 samples): self-adhesive resin cement (Breeze-Pentron Clinical) and glass fiber posts (LuxaPost-DMG). Group C (10 samples): 3 steps light-curing, self-etching, self-conditioning bonding agent (Contax-Total-etch-DMG), dual-cured resin-composite cement (LuxaCore-DMG) and glass fiber posts (LuxaPost-DMG). The survey was conducted by examining the breaking resistance of the post-cement-tooth complex, subjected to a mechanical force. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Inc. ver. 13.0, Chicago, IL, USA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group A values of bond strenth ranged from a minimum of 10.14 Mpa to a maximum value of 14.73 Mpa with a mean value of 12.58 Mpa. In Group B the highest value of bond strength was 6.54 Mpa and the minimum 5.55 Mpa. The mean value of the bond strength for the entire group was 6.58 Mpa. In Group C the highest bond strength was 6.59 Mpa whereas the lowest bond strength was 4.84 Mpa. Mean value of the bond strength of Group C was calculated at 5.7 Mpa.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Etching with orthophosphoric acid combined with a dual-curing adhesive system and a dual-cured resin-composite cement was the technique that guaranteed the highest bond strength. Lowest bond strength values were obtained when dual self-adhesive cement was used.</p>","PeriodicalId":78041,"journal":{"name":"Annali di stomatologia","volume":"8 1","pages":"29-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.029","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali di stomatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this experimental study was to compare the traditional cement systems with those of the latest generation, to assess if indeed these could represent of viable substitutes in the cementation of indirect restorations, and in the specific case of endodontic posts.

Methods: The assessment of the validity of the cementing methods was performed according to the test of the push-out, conducted on sections obtained from the roots of treated teeth. The samples were divided into three groups. Group A (10 samples): etching for 30 seconds with 37% orthophosphoric acid (Superlux-Thixo-etch-DMG) combined with a dual-curing adhesive system (LuxaBond-Total Etch-DMG), dual-cured resin-composite cement (LuxaCore-DMG) and glass fiber posts (LuxaPost-DMG). Group B (10 samples): self-adhesive resin cement (Breeze-Pentron Clinical) and glass fiber posts (LuxaPost-DMG). Group C (10 samples): 3 steps light-curing, self-etching, self-conditioning bonding agent (Contax-Total-etch-DMG), dual-cured resin-composite cement (LuxaCore-DMG) and glass fiber posts (LuxaPost-DMG). The survey was conducted by examining the breaking resistance of the post-cement-tooth complex, subjected to a mechanical force. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Inc. ver. 13.0, Chicago, IL, USA.

Results: Group A values of bond strenth ranged from a minimum of 10.14 Mpa to a maximum value of 14.73 Mpa with a mean value of 12.58 Mpa. In Group B the highest value of bond strength was 6.54 Mpa and the minimum 5.55 Mpa. The mean value of the bond strength for the entire group was 6.58 Mpa. In Group C the highest bond strength was 6.59 Mpa whereas the lowest bond strength was 4.84 Mpa. Mean value of the bond strength of Group C was calculated at 5.7 Mpa.

Conclusions: Etching with orthophosphoric acid combined with a dual-curing adhesive system and a dual-cured resin-composite cement was the technique that guaranteed the highest bond strength. Lowest bond strength values were obtained when dual self-adhesive cement was used.

Abstract Image

三种玻璃纤维桩胶结技术的比较。
目的:本实验研究的目的是比较传统的水泥系统与最新一代的水泥系统,以评估这些系统是否确实可以代表间接修复体固接的可行替代品,并在根管桩的具体情况下。方法:通过对治疗牙根部分的牙体推出试验来评价固接方法的有效性。这些样本被分成三组。A组(10个样品):用37%正磷酸(Superlux-Thixo-etch-DMG)结合双固化胶粘剂体系(LuxaBond-Total Etch-DMG)、双固化树脂复合水泥(luxacre - dmg)和玻璃纤维桩(LuxaPost-DMG)蚀刻30秒。B组(10个样品):自粘树脂水泥(Breeze-Pentron Clinical)和玻璃纤维桩(LuxaPost-DMG)。C组(10个样品):3步光固化、自蚀刻、自调节胶粘剂(contax - total -蚀刻- dmg)、双固化树脂复合水泥(LuxaCore-DMG)和玻璃纤维桩(LuxaPost-DMG)。该调查是通过检查后水泥-牙齿复合物在机械力作用下的断裂阻力来进行的。采用SPSS Inc. ver进行统计分析。13.0,芝加哥,伊利诺伊州,美国。结果:A组粘结强度最小值为10.14 Mpa,最大值为14.73 Mpa,平均值为12.58 Mpa。B组粘结强度最大值为6.54 Mpa,最小值为5.55 Mpa。整个组的粘结强度平均值为6.58 Mpa。C组的结合强度最高为6.59 Mpa,最低为4.84 Mpa。C组的粘结强度平均值为5.7 Mpa。结论:正磷酸蚀刻结合双固化胶粘剂体系和双固化树脂复合水泥是保证最高粘结强度的方法。双自粘水泥的粘结强度值最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信