Reducing the number of unnecessary liver function tests requested on the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit.

BMJ quality improvement reports Pub Date : 2017-06-16 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjquality.u214071.w5561
Lynn Sinitsky, Joe Brierley
{"title":"Reducing the number of unnecessary liver function tests requested on the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit.","authors":"Lynn Sinitsky, Joe Brierley","doi":"10.1136/bmjquality.u214071.w5561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Between January and October 2014, Great Ormond Street Hospital Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) was spending an average £23,392 on blood tests per month. Blood tests should be requested based on previous results and the patient's clinical condition, medication and nutritional status. However, more blood tests were being ordered than clinically indicated: an audit in October 2014 showed liver function tests (LFTs) were requested daily on most patients, even with previous normal results. A driver diagram identified three primary drivers for blood test requesting: decision-making, situational awareness and computer-based ordering. Decision-making for routine blood tests was the responsibility of the bedside nurses on each night shift. The communication between the nurses and doctors was an identified secondary driver. The project's primary aim was to reduce unnecessary LFTs requests on PICU over 6 months by implementing a blood test request form, a table of common investigations to facilitate and document discussion between the nursing and medical teams. The secondary aims were to reduce other unnecessary blood test requests, including full blood counts (FBC), coagulation screens and CRP. This project was conducted in three phases: construction, testing and implementation of the blood test form. PDSA cycles were used within each phase. Two PICU nurse champions were engaged to provide bedside support, education and feedback. In the 8-month period following implementation, there was a significant sustained reduction in LFTs requests. A similar pattern of sustained reduction also occurred for FBC, coagulation screens and CRP requests. This sustained reduction in blood tests requested equated to a saving in excess of £36,000. This project was successful: the reduction in the number of inappropriate blood tests had clear financial benefit for PICU and reduced blood loss for patients. Early engagement and support from key stakeholders avoided conflict, guaranteed data sharing and aided engagement of bedside nurses.</p>","PeriodicalId":91218,"journal":{"name":"BMJ quality improvement reports","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d7/f1/bmjqir.u214071.w5561.PMC5483531.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ quality improvement reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u214071.w5561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Between January and October 2014, Great Ormond Street Hospital Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) was spending an average £23,392 on blood tests per month. Blood tests should be requested based on previous results and the patient's clinical condition, medication and nutritional status. However, more blood tests were being ordered than clinically indicated: an audit in October 2014 showed liver function tests (LFTs) were requested daily on most patients, even with previous normal results. A driver diagram identified three primary drivers for blood test requesting: decision-making, situational awareness and computer-based ordering. Decision-making for routine blood tests was the responsibility of the bedside nurses on each night shift. The communication between the nurses and doctors was an identified secondary driver. The project's primary aim was to reduce unnecessary LFTs requests on PICU over 6 months by implementing a blood test request form, a table of common investigations to facilitate and document discussion between the nursing and medical teams. The secondary aims were to reduce other unnecessary blood test requests, including full blood counts (FBC), coagulation screens and CRP. This project was conducted in three phases: construction, testing and implementation of the blood test form. PDSA cycles were used within each phase. Two PICU nurse champions were engaged to provide bedside support, education and feedback. In the 8-month period following implementation, there was a significant sustained reduction in LFTs requests. A similar pattern of sustained reduction also occurred for FBC, coagulation screens and CRP requests. This sustained reduction in blood tests requested equated to a saving in excess of £36,000. This project was successful: the reduction in the number of inappropriate blood tests had clear financial benefit for PICU and reduced blood loss for patients. Early engagement and support from key stakeholders avoided conflict, guaranteed data sharing and aided engagement of bedside nurses.

Abstract Image

减少儿科重症监护室不必要的肝功能检测次数。
2014年1月至10月期间,大奥蒙德街医院儿科重症监护病房(PICU)每月平均花费23392英镑用于血液化验。血液化验的要求应基于之前的化验结果以及患者的临床状况、用药和营养状况。然而,血液化验单上的化验项目却多于临床需要:2014 年 10 月的一项审计显示,大多数患者每天都需要进行肝功能化验(LFT),即使之前的化验结果正常。一张驱动力图表确定了申请血液化验的三个主要驱动力:决策、情景感知和计算机下单。常规血液化验的决策工作由每个夜班的床旁护士负责。护士和医生之间的沟通是已确定的次要驱动因素。该项目的首要目标是在 6 个月内减少 PICU 不必要的低密度脂蛋白血症检查申请,具体做法是采用血液检查申请表和常见检查项目表,以促进和记录护理团队与医疗团队之间的讨论。次要目标是减少其他不必要的血液检查申请,包括全血细胞计数(FBC)、凝血筛查和 CRP。该项目分三个阶段进行:构建、测试和实施血液化验单。每个阶段都采用了 PDSA 循环。两名 PICU 护士长参与提供床旁支持、教育和反馈。在实施后的 8 个月内,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LFT)检测申请持续大幅减少。全血细胞计数、凝血筛查和 CRP 申请也出现了类似的持续减少。血液化验申请的持续减少相当于节省了 36,000 多英镑。该项目是成功的:减少了不适当的血液化验次数,为 PICU 带来了明显的经济效益,并减少了患者的失血量。主要利益相关者的早期参与和支持避免了冲突,保证了数据共享,并有助于床边护士的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信