Integration of mesenchymal stem cells into islet cell spheroids improves long-term viability, but not islet function.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Islets Pub Date : 2017-09-03 Epub Date: 2017-06-29 DOI:10.1080/19382014.2017.1341455
Sonia Rawal, S Janette Williams, Karthik Ramachandran, Lisa Stehno-Bittel
{"title":"Integration of mesenchymal stem cells into islet cell spheroids improves long-term viability, but not islet function.","authors":"Sonia Rawal,&nbsp;S Janette Williams,&nbsp;Karthik Ramachandran,&nbsp;Lisa Stehno-Bittel","doi":"10.1080/19382014.2017.1341455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pancreatic islets, especially the large islets (> 150µm in diameter) have poor survival rates in culture. Co-culturing with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has been shown to improve islet survival and function. However, most co-culture studies have been comprised of MSC surrounding islets in the media. The purpose of this study was to determine whether islet survival and function was improved when the 2 populations of cells were intermingled with each other in a defined geometry. Hybrid spheroids containing 25, 50 or 75 or 90% islets cells with appropriate numbers of MSCs were created along with spheroids comprised of only islet cells or only MSCs. Spheroids were tested for yield, viability, diameter, cellular composition, and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. The 25% islet/75% MSC group created the fewest spheroids, with the poorest survival and insulin secretion and the largest diameter. The remaining groups were highly viable with average diameters under 80µm at formation. However, the hybrid spheroid groups preferred to cluster in islet-only spheroids. The 50, 75 and 90% islet cell groups had excellent long-term survival with 90-95% viability at 2 weeks in culture, compared with the islet only group that were below 80% viability. The glucose-stimulated insulin secretion was not statistically different for the 50, 75, or 90 groups when exposed to 2.4, 16.8, or 22.4 mM glucose. Only the spheroids with 25% islet cells had a statistically lower levels of insulin release, and the 100% had statistically higher levels at 22.4 mM glucose and in response to secretagogue. Thus, imbedded co-culture improved long-term viability, but failed to enhance glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in vitro.</p>","PeriodicalId":14671,"journal":{"name":"Islets","volume":"9 5","pages":"87-98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19382014.2017.1341455","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islets","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19382014.2017.1341455","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Pancreatic islets, especially the large islets (> 150µm in diameter) have poor survival rates in culture. Co-culturing with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has been shown to improve islet survival and function. However, most co-culture studies have been comprised of MSC surrounding islets in the media. The purpose of this study was to determine whether islet survival and function was improved when the 2 populations of cells were intermingled with each other in a defined geometry. Hybrid spheroids containing 25, 50 or 75 or 90% islets cells with appropriate numbers of MSCs were created along with spheroids comprised of only islet cells or only MSCs. Spheroids were tested for yield, viability, diameter, cellular composition, and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. The 25% islet/75% MSC group created the fewest spheroids, with the poorest survival and insulin secretion and the largest diameter. The remaining groups were highly viable with average diameters under 80µm at formation. However, the hybrid spheroid groups preferred to cluster in islet-only spheroids. The 50, 75 and 90% islet cell groups had excellent long-term survival with 90-95% viability at 2 weeks in culture, compared with the islet only group that were below 80% viability. The glucose-stimulated insulin secretion was not statistically different for the 50, 75, or 90 groups when exposed to 2.4, 16.8, or 22.4 mM glucose. Only the spheroids with 25% islet cells had a statistically lower levels of insulin release, and the 100% had statistically higher levels at 22.4 mM glucose and in response to secretagogue. Thus, imbedded co-culture improved long-term viability, but failed to enhance glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in vitro.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

将间充质干细胞整合到胰岛细胞球体中可以改善长期生存能力,但不能改善胰岛功能。
胰岛,特别是大胰岛(直径> 150µm)在培养中存活率很低。与间充质干细胞(MSCs)共培养已被证明可以改善胰岛的存活和功能。然而,大多数共培养研究都是由媒体中围绕胰岛的MSC组成的。本研究的目的是确定当两群细胞以特定的几何形状相互混合时,胰岛的存活和功能是否得到改善。混合球体含有25,50或75%或90%的胰岛细胞和适当数量的间充质干细胞,以及仅由胰岛细胞或仅由间充质干细胞组成的球体。球体的产量,活力,直径,细胞组成和葡萄糖刺激胰岛素分泌进行了测试。25%胰岛细胞/75%间充质干细胞组产生的球体最少,存活率和胰岛素分泌最差,直径最大。其余各组在地层中平均直径小于80µm,具有很高的存活率。然而,杂交椭球群倾向于聚集在只有胰岛的椭球体中。50,75和90%胰岛细胞组在培养2周时的存活率为90-95%,与仅胰岛细胞组相比,存活率低于80%。当暴露于2.4、16.8或22.4 mM葡萄糖时,葡萄糖刺激的胰岛素分泌在50、75或90组之间没有统计学差异。只有含有25%胰岛细胞的球状体具有统计学上较低的胰岛素释放水平,而100%的球状体在22.4 mM葡萄糖和促分泌剂作用下具有统计学上较高的胰岛素释放水平。因此,共培养提高了长期生存能力,但未能提高体外葡萄糖刺激的胰岛素分泌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Islets
Islets ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
10
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Islets is the first international, peer-reviewed research journal dedicated to islet biology. Islets publishes high-quality clinical and experimental research into the physiology and pathology of the islets of Langerhans. In addition to original research manuscripts, Islets is the leading source for cutting-edge Perspectives, Reviews and Commentaries. Our goal is to foster communication and a rapid exchange of information through timely publication of important results using print as well as electronic formats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信