Microhardness evaluation of silorane and methacrylate composites submitted to erosion and abrasion processes.

Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2015-09-21 eCollection Date: 2015-12-01 DOI:10.3109/23337931.2015.1084884
Eloá Aguiar Gazola, Marcos Augusto Rego, William Cunha Brandt, Maria Beatriz Freitas D'Arce, Priscila Christiane Suzy Liporoni
{"title":"Microhardness evaluation of silorane and methacrylate composites submitted to erosion and abrasion processes.","authors":"Eloá Aguiar Gazola,&nbsp;Marcos Augusto Rego,&nbsp;William Cunha Brandt,&nbsp;Maria Beatriz Freitas D'Arce,&nbsp;Priscila Christiane Suzy Liporoni","doi":"10.3109/23337931.2015.1084884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>: The aim of this study was to evaluate the Knoop hardness number (KHN) of methacrylate (MC) and silorane (SC) composites after being submitted to erosion and abrasion processes. <i>Material and methods</i>: Forty samples were made with each composite: MC and SC. The samples were divided into eight groups (<i>n</i> = 10) according to the type of composite (G1-G4, MC; G5-G8, SC) and the beverages involved in the erosion process (G1 and G5 - Control (C), without erosion, with abrasion; G2 and G6 - Orange Juice (OJ), abrasion; G3 and G7 - Smirnoff Ice® (SI), abrasion; G4 and G8 - Gatorade® (GA), abrasion). The KHN test was performed 24 h after the last cycle of erosion/abrasion. <i>Results</i>: The MC groups showed smaller KHN values for the SI group (<i>p</i> < 0.05) when compared to the Control and OJ groups; however, for the SC groups, no differences were found (<i>p</i> > 0.05). <i>Conclusion</i>: Methacrylate composite when submitted to acidic beverages erosive challenge combined with abrasive process might alter its surface microhardness. However, the beverages used in the present study were not able to interfere in silorane composite surface microhardness.</p>","PeriodicalId":6997,"journal":{"name":"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica","volume":"1 2-4","pages":"66-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/23337931.2015.1084884","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/23337931.2015.1084884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the Knoop hardness number (KHN) of methacrylate (MC) and silorane (SC) composites after being submitted to erosion and abrasion processes. Material and methods: Forty samples were made with each composite: MC and SC. The samples were divided into eight groups (n = 10) according to the type of composite (G1-G4, MC; G5-G8, SC) and the beverages involved in the erosion process (G1 and G5 - Control (C), without erosion, with abrasion; G2 and G6 - Orange Juice (OJ), abrasion; G3 and G7 - Smirnoff Ice® (SI), abrasion; G4 and G8 - Gatorade® (GA), abrasion). The KHN test was performed 24 h after the last cycle of erosion/abrasion. Results: The MC groups showed smaller KHN values for the SI group (p < 0.05) when compared to the Control and OJ groups; however, for the SC groups, no differences were found (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Methacrylate composite when submitted to acidic beverages erosive challenge combined with abrasive process might alter its surface microhardness. However, the beverages used in the present study were not able to interfere in silorane composite surface microhardness.

硅烷和甲基丙烯酸酯复合材料在侵蚀和磨损过程中的显微硬度评价。
目的:研究甲基丙烯酸酯(MC)和硅烷(SC)复合材料经冲蚀磨损后的努氏硬度值(KHN)。材料与方法:MC和SC各制备40个样品,按复合材料类型分为8组(n = 10) (G1-G4, MC;G5- g8, SC)和涉及侵蚀过程的饮料(G1和G5- Control (C),无侵蚀,有磨损;G2和G6 -橙汁(OJ),磨损;G3和G7 - Smirnoff Ice®(SI),耐磨;G4和G8 -佳得乐®(GA),磨损)。在最后一个冲蚀/磨损循环后24小时进行KHN测试。结果:MC组SI组的KHN值小于对照组和OJ组(p < 0.05);SC组间差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。结论:甲基丙烯酸酯复合材料在酸性饮料的侵蚀作用下,加之磨料加工,会改变其表面显微硬度。然而,在本研究中使用的饮料不能干扰硅烷复合材料的表面显微硬度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信