Effects of six different preventive treatments on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets: in vitro study.

Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2015-04-14 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.3109/23337931.2015.1021351
Gianguido Cossellu, Valentina Lanteri, Andrea Butera, Michele Sarcina, Giampietro Farronato
{"title":"Effects of six different preventive treatments on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets: <i>in vitro</i> study.","authors":"Gianguido Cossellu,&nbsp;Valentina Lanteri,&nbsp;Andrea Butera,&nbsp;Michele Sarcina,&nbsp;Giampietro Farronato","doi":"10.3109/23337931.2015.1021351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of six different prophylactic agents on shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets. <i>Materials and methods</i>: One hundred twenty-six freshly extracted mandibular bovine incisors were used. Teeth were randomly divided into 7 equal groups (18 per group) as follows: group-1 served as control with no pre-treatment; group-2 enamel treated with fluoride varnish (Fluor Protector, Ivoclar Vivadent); group-3 containing casein-phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium-phosphate (CPP-ACP) paste (GC Tooth Mousse, RECALDENT™); group-4 with ozone (HealOzone, Kavo<i>)</i>; group-5 with glycine powder (Perio Flow, EMS); group-6 with hydroxyapatite powder 99.5% (Coswell S.p.A.); group-7 with a toothpaste made of hydroxyapatite nanocrystals (BioRepair® Plus, Coswell S.p.A). Brackets were all bonded using the same technique with transbond XT (3 M Unitek, Monrovia, CA). All the bonded specimens were stored for 24 h in deionized water (37 °C) and subjected to thermal cycling for 1000 cycles. The SBS was measured with an Instron Universal Testing machine and the adhesive remnant was assessed with the adhesive remnant index (ARI) using a stereomicroscope at 10× magnification. <i>Results</i>: Statistical differences (ANOVA) were found among the seven investigated groups (<i>F</i> = 12.226, <i>p <</i> 0.001). SBS of groups 2, 5 and 6 were significantly lower than the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). ARI scores (chi-square test) were correlated with the differences of SBS values. <i>Conclusion:</i> CPP-ACP paste, ozone or BioRepair® did not compromise on bracket bond strength. Fluoride, glycine or hydroxyapatite significantly decreased the SBS; only the fluoride group showed significant clinically low (<6 MPa) SBS values.</p>","PeriodicalId":6997,"journal":{"name":"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica","volume":"1 1","pages":"13-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/23337931.2015.1021351","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/23337931.2015.1021351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of six different prophylactic agents on shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets. Materials and methods: One hundred twenty-six freshly extracted mandibular bovine incisors were used. Teeth were randomly divided into 7 equal groups (18 per group) as follows: group-1 served as control with no pre-treatment; group-2 enamel treated with fluoride varnish (Fluor Protector, Ivoclar Vivadent); group-3 containing casein-phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium-phosphate (CPP-ACP) paste (GC Tooth Mousse, RECALDENT™); group-4 with ozone (HealOzone, Kavo); group-5 with glycine powder (Perio Flow, EMS); group-6 with hydroxyapatite powder 99.5% (Coswell S.p.A.); group-7 with a toothpaste made of hydroxyapatite nanocrystals (BioRepair® Plus, Coswell S.p.A). Brackets were all bonded using the same technique with transbond XT (3 M Unitek, Monrovia, CA). All the bonded specimens were stored for 24 h in deionized water (37 °C) and subjected to thermal cycling for 1000 cycles. The SBS was measured with an Instron Universal Testing machine and the adhesive remnant was assessed with the adhesive remnant index (ARI) using a stereomicroscope at 10× magnification. Results: Statistical differences (ANOVA) were found among the seven investigated groups (F = 12.226, p < 0.001). SBS of groups 2, 5 and 6 were significantly lower than the control group (p < 0.05). ARI scores (chi-square test) were correlated with the differences of SBS values. Conclusion: CPP-ACP paste, ozone or BioRepair® did not compromise on bracket bond strength. Fluoride, glycine or hydroxyapatite significantly decreased the SBS; only the fluoride group showed significant clinically low (<6 MPa) SBS values.

Abstract Image

六种不同预防处理对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度影响的体外研究。
目的:评价6种不同预防剂对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度(SBS)的影响。材料与方法:采用新鲜提取的牛下颌骨切牙126颗。将牙随机分为7组,每组18只,对照组,不进行预处理;用氟化物清漆(氟保护剂,Ivoclar Vivadent)处理的组2搪瓷;组-3含酪蛋白-磷酸肽-无定形磷酸钙(CPP-ACP)膏体(GC齿摩丝,RECALDENT™);4组含臭氧(HealOzone, Kavo);5组:甘氨酸粉(Perio Flow, EMS);6组羟基磷灰石粉99.5% (Coswell S.p.A);组7用羟基磷灰石纳米晶体制成的牙膏(BioRepair®Plus, Coswell S.p.A)。用跨键XT (3 M Unitek, Monrovia, CA)结合支架采用相同的技术。所有粘合后的样品在去离子水(37℃)中保存24 h,并进行1000次热循环。用Instron万能试验机测定SBS,用10倍放大的体视显微镜测定黏合剂残留指数(ARI)。结果:7组间差异有统计学意义(F = 12.226, p 0.001)。2、5、6组的SBS显著低于对照组(p < 0.05)。ARI评分(卡方检验)与SBS值的差异有相关性。结论:CPP-ACP膏体、臭氧或BioRepair®均不影响支架结合强度。氟化物、甘氨酸和羟基磷灰石显著降低SBS;只有氟化物组临床表现明显低(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信