Water sorption and solubility of polyamide denture base materials.

Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2017-05-13 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1080/23337931.2017.1326009
Long G Nguyen, Hilde M Kopperud, Marit Øilo
{"title":"Water sorption and solubility of polyamide denture base materials.","authors":"Long G Nguyen,&nbsp;Hilde M Kopperud,&nbsp;Marit Øilo","doi":"10.1080/23337931.2017.1326009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Some patients experience adverse reactions to poly(methyl methacrylate)-based (PMMA) dentures. Polyamide (PA) as an alternative to PMMA has, however, not been well documented with regard to water sorption and water solubility. The aim of this <i>in vitro</i> study was to measure water sorption and water solubility of two PA materials compared with PMMA, and to evaluate the major components released from the PA materials and the effect on hardness of the materials. <b>Methods:</b> Ten discs (40.0 mm diameter, 2.0 mm thick) of each material (PA: Valplast and Breflex; PMMA: SR Ivocap HIP) were prepared according to manufacturers' recommendations. The specimens were tested for water sorption and water solubility, according to a modification of ISO 20795-1:2008. Released substances were analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). <b>Results:</b> There were statistically significant differences among the materials regarding water sorption, water solubility and time to water saturation. Breflex had the highest water sorption (30.4 μg/mm<sup>3</sup>), followed by PMMA-material (25.8 μg/mm<sup>3</sup>) and Valplast (13.6 μg/mm<sup>3</sup>). Both PA materials had statistically significant lower water solubility than the PMMA. Both PA had a net increase in weight. Analysis by GC/MS identified release of the compound 12-aminododecanolactam from the material Valplast. No release was found from the Breflex material. <b>Conclusions:</b> The PA denture materials show differences in water sorption and solubility, but within the limits of the standard requirements. The PA showed a net increase in weight after long-term water sorption. The clinical implications of the findings are not elucidated.</p>","PeriodicalId":6997,"journal":{"name":"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica","volume":"3 1","pages":"47-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23337931.2017.1326009","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2017.1326009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Purpose: Some patients experience adverse reactions to poly(methyl methacrylate)-based (PMMA) dentures. Polyamide (PA) as an alternative to PMMA has, however, not been well documented with regard to water sorption and water solubility. The aim of this in vitro study was to measure water sorption and water solubility of two PA materials compared with PMMA, and to evaluate the major components released from the PA materials and the effect on hardness of the materials. Methods: Ten discs (40.0 mm diameter, 2.0 mm thick) of each material (PA: Valplast and Breflex; PMMA: SR Ivocap HIP) were prepared according to manufacturers' recommendations. The specimens were tested for water sorption and water solubility, according to a modification of ISO 20795-1:2008. Released substances were analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Results: There were statistically significant differences among the materials regarding water sorption, water solubility and time to water saturation. Breflex had the highest water sorption (30.4 μg/mm3), followed by PMMA-material (25.8 μg/mm3) and Valplast (13.6 μg/mm3). Both PA materials had statistically significant lower water solubility than the PMMA. Both PA had a net increase in weight. Analysis by GC/MS identified release of the compound 12-aminododecanolactam from the material Valplast. No release was found from the Breflex material. Conclusions: The PA denture materials show differences in water sorption and solubility, but within the limits of the standard requirements. The PA showed a net increase in weight after long-term water sorption. The clinical implications of the findings are not elucidated.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

聚酰胺义齿基托材料的吸水性和溶解度。
目的:一些患者对聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)基假牙有不良反应。然而,聚酰胺(PA)作为PMMA的替代品,在吸水性和水溶性方面还没有得到很好的证明。本体外实验的目的是测定两种PA材料与PMMA相比的吸水性和水溶性,并评价PA材料释放的主要成分及其对材料硬度的影响。方法:每种材料10个(直径40.0 mm,厚2.0 mm) (PA: Valplast和Breflex;PMMA: SR Ivocap HIP)是根据制造商的建议制备的。根据ISO 20795-1:2008的修改,测试了样品的吸水性和水溶性。采用气相色谱/质谱(GC/MS)分析释放物质。结果:两种材料在吸水性、水溶性、达到水饱和时间方面差异有统计学意义。Breflex的吸水率最高(30.4 μg/mm3),其次是PMMA-material (25.8 μg/mm3)和Valplast (13.6 μg/mm3)。两种PA材料的水溶性均显著低于PMMA。两种PA的体重都有净增加。GC/MS分析鉴定了Valplast材料中化合物12-氨基十二醇内酰胺的释放。没有发现Breflex材料的释放。结论:PA义齿材料的吸水性和溶解度存在差异,但均在标准要求范围内。PA在长期吸水后表现出净重量增加。这些发现的临床意义尚未阐明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信