Preventive actions of allergen immunotherapy: the facts and the effects in search of evidence.

Q2 Medicine
Clinical and Molecular Allergy Pub Date : 2017-06-15 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s12948-017-0070-7
Irene Martignago, Cristoforo Incorvaia, Erminia Ridolo
{"title":"Preventive actions of allergen immunotherapy: the facts and the effects in search of evidence.","authors":"Irene Martignago,&nbsp;Cristoforo Incorvaia,&nbsp;Erminia Ridolo","doi":"10.1186/s12948-017-0070-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only treatment that works on the causes of allergy. Available AIT nowadays are subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for allergic rhinitis and asthma, while for allergy to <i>Hymenoptera</i> venom only subcutaneous route is recommended. A bulk of trials and meta-analyses demonstrated that efficacy and safety of AIT in decreasing allergic clinical symptoms and use of rescue medications, while its preventive capacity is yet under investigation. The most important of these effects is the prevention of potentially fatal anaphylactic reactions to <i>Hymenoptera</i> stings by venom immunotherapy (VIT). A certain number of studies thus far available showed that AIT, in both forms, is able to prevent the progress of allergic rhinitis into asthma and the development of new sensitizations. These effects should be related to the mechanisms of action of AIT. In fact, it has been demonstrated that both SCIT and SLIT are able to modify the allergen presentation by dendritic cells, with result in modification of the phenotype of allergen-specific T cells, switching from the typical of allergic inflammation Th2-type response to a Th1-type one. Also allergen-specific T regulatory (Treg) cells play a pivotal role by producing suppressive cytokines, such as IL-10 and TGF-beta. However, the only plain evidence of a preventive effect concerns VIT, while the other outcomes need to be furtherly investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":38753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Molecular Allergy","volume":"15 ","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12948-017-0070-7","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Molecular Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12948-017-0070-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only treatment that works on the causes of allergy. Available AIT nowadays are subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for allergic rhinitis and asthma, while for allergy to Hymenoptera venom only subcutaneous route is recommended. A bulk of trials and meta-analyses demonstrated that efficacy and safety of AIT in decreasing allergic clinical symptoms and use of rescue medications, while its preventive capacity is yet under investigation. The most important of these effects is the prevention of potentially fatal anaphylactic reactions to Hymenoptera stings by venom immunotherapy (VIT). A certain number of studies thus far available showed that AIT, in both forms, is able to prevent the progress of allergic rhinitis into asthma and the development of new sensitizations. These effects should be related to the mechanisms of action of AIT. In fact, it has been demonstrated that both SCIT and SLIT are able to modify the allergen presentation by dendritic cells, with result in modification of the phenotype of allergen-specific T cells, switching from the typical of allergic inflammation Th2-type response to a Th1-type one. Also allergen-specific T regulatory (Treg) cells play a pivotal role by producing suppressive cytokines, such as IL-10 and TGF-beta. However, the only plain evidence of a preventive effect concerns VIT, while the other outcomes need to be furtherly investigated.

过敏原免疫治疗的预防措施:事实和证据的效果。
过敏原免疫疗法(AIT)是唯一有效的治疗过敏的原因。目前,针对过敏性鼻炎和哮喘,可采用皮下免疫治疗(SCIT)和舌下免疫治疗(SLIT),而对于膜翅目蛇毒过敏,仅推荐皮下免疫治疗。大量的试验和荟萃分析表明,AIT在减少过敏临床症状和使用抢救药物方面的有效性和安全性,但其预防能力尚待研究。其中最重要的作用是通过毒液免疫疗法(VIT)预防对膜翅目昆虫蜇伤的潜在致命的过敏反应。目前已有一定数量的研究表明,两种形式的AIT都能够防止变应性鼻炎发展为哮喘和新的致敏性的发展。这些影响应该与AIT的作用机制有关。事实上,已经证明SCIT和SLIT都能够改变树突状细胞对过敏原的呈现,从而改变过敏原特异性T细胞的表型,从典型的过敏性炎症th2型反应转变为th1型反应。此外,过敏原特异性T调节细胞(Treg)通过产生抑制细胞因子(如IL-10和tgf - β)发挥关键作用。然而,预防效果的唯一明确证据与VIT有关,而其他结果需要进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Molecular Allergy
Clinical and Molecular Allergy Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Molecular Allergy is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that publishes research on human allergic and immunodeficient disease (immune deficiency not related to HIV infection/AIDS). The scope of the journal encompasses all aspects of the clinical, genetic, molecular and inflammatory aspects of allergic-respiratory (Type 1 hypersensitivity) and non-AIDS immunodeficiency disorders. However, studies of allergic/hypersensitive aspects of HIV infection/AIDS or drug desensitization protocols in AIDS are acceptable. At the basic science level, this includes original work and reviews on the genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying the inflammatory response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信