Associations of Pet Ownership with Older Adults Eating Patterns and Health.

Q2 Medicine
Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-05-29 DOI:10.1155/2017/9417350
Roschelle Heuberger
{"title":"Associations of Pet Ownership with Older Adults Eating Patterns and Health.","authors":"Roschelle Heuberger","doi":"10.1155/2017/9417350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pet ownership has been shown to improve quality of life for older adults. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to compare older pet owners and older non-pet owners and assess differences between groups. This study was conducted on adults over 50 years of age, who owned either one cat or one dog versus nonowners based on age, race, gender, and education. Matched older pet owners (OPO) versus non-pet owners (NPO) pairs (<i>n</i> = 84), older cat owners (OCO) versus non-cat owners (NCO) (<i>n</i> = 29), and older dog owners (ODO) versus non-dog owners (NDO) pairs (<i>n</i> = 55) were analyzed. No differences were found between OPO and NPO for dietary, activity, or lifestyle, except OPO had fewer health conditions [<i>p</i> < 0.03]. Total OCO had greater body mass indices [BMI] (<i>μ</i> = 29.6 ± 8.2) than ODO (<i>μ</i> = 23.2 ± 5.2) [<i>p</i> < 0.02], less activity [<i>p</i> < 0.02], and shorter duration of activity [<i>p</i> < 0.05] and took fewer supplements [<i>p</i> < 0.003]. OCO and NCO differed on health conditions (<i>μ</i> = 0.8 ± 0.9 versus <i>μ</i> = 1.9 ± 1.3, [<i>p</i> < 0.008]) and ODO versus NDO differed on BMI (<i>μ</i> = 25 ± 4 versus <i>μ</i> = 27 ± 6, [<i>p</i> < 0.04]). Although there are limitations to this study, data may be useful for targeting marketing and health messages to older persons.</p>","PeriodicalId":39066,"journal":{"name":"Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research","volume":"2017 ","pages":"9417350"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/9417350","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9417350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Pet ownership has been shown to improve quality of life for older adults. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to compare older pet owners and older non-pet owners and assess differences between groups. This study was conducted on adults over 50 years of age, who owned either one cat or one dog versus nonowners based on age, race, gender, and education. Matched older pet owners (OPO) versus non-pet owners (NPO) pairs (n = 84), older cat owners (OCO) versus non-cat owners (NCO) (n = 29), and older dog owners (ODO) versus non-dog owners (NDO) pairs (n = 55) were analyzed. No differences were found between OPO and NPO for dietary, activity, or lifestyle, except OPO had fewer health conditions [p < 0.03]. Total OCO had greater body mass indices [BMI] (μ = 29.6 ± 8.2) than ODO (μ = 23.2 ± 5.2) [p < 0.02], less activity [p < 0.02], and shorter duration of activity [p < 0.05] and took fewer supplements [p < 0.003]. OCO and NCO differed on health conditions (μ = 0.8 ± 0.9 versus μ = 1.9 ± 1.3, [p < 0.008]) and ODO versus NDO differed on BMI (μ = 25 ± 4 versus μ = 27 ± 6, [p < 0.04]). Although there are limitations to this study, data may be useful for targeting marketing and health messages to older persons.

Abstract Image

养宠物与老年人饮食习惯和健康的关系。
养宠物已被证明可以提高老年人的生活质量。这项横断面研究的目的是比较老年宠物主人和老年非宠物主人,并评估两组之间的差异。这项研究是在50岁以上的成年人中进行的,根据年龄、种族、性别和教育程度,他们要么养一只猫,要么养一只狗,要么不养猫。对老年宠物主人(OPO)与非宠物主人(NPO)配对(n = 84)、老年猫主人(OCO)与非猫主人(NCO)配对(n = 29)、老年狗主人(ODO)与非狗主人(NDO)配对(n = 55)进行了分析。OPO组和NPO组在饮食、活动或生活方式方面没有差异,但OPO组的健康状况较少[p < 0.03]。总OCO的体重指数(BMI) (μ = 29.6±8.2)高于ODO (μ = 23.2±5.2)[p < 0.02],活动较少[p < 0.02],活动持续时间较短[p < 0.05],服用补充剂较少[p < 0.003]。OCO与NCO在健康状况上存在差异(μ = 0.8±0.9 vs . μ = 1.9±1.3,[p < 0.008]), ODO与NDO在BMI上存在差异(μ = 25±4 vs . μ = 27±6,[p < 0.04])。虽然这项研究存在局限性,但数据可能对针对老年人的营销和健康信息有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research
Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信