Auditory-Tactile integration: Effects of Phase of Sinusoidal Stimulation at 50 and 250 Hz.

Parivash Ranjbar, E Courtenay Wilson, Charlotte M Reed, Louis D Braida
{"title":"Auditory-Tactile integration: Effects of Phase of Sinusoidal Stimulation at 50 and 250 Hz.","authors":"Parivash Ranjbar,&nbsp;E Courtenay Wilson,&nbsp;Charlotte M Reed,&nbsp;Louis D Braida","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The perceptual integration of 50- and 250-Hz, 500-ms vibrotactile and auditory tones was studied in detection experiments as a function of the relative phase (0°, 72°, 144°, 216°, and 288°) of the tone pulses. Vibrotactile stimuli were delivered through a single-channel vibrator to the left middle fingertip and auditory stimuli were presented diotically through headphones in a background of 50 dB SPL broadband noise. The observers were four adults with normal hearing. The vibrotactile and auditory stimulus levels used each yielded 63-77%-Correct unimodal detection performance in a two-interval two-alternative forced-choice task. Scores for the auditory-alone and tactile-alone conditions averaged roughly 70%-Correct. Mean scores for the auditory plus tactile conditions averaged across different phases were 77.1%-Correct at 50 Hz and 79.6%-Correct at 250 Hz. At 50 Hz, no differences in performance were observed as a function of the relative phase at which the combined auditory and tactile signals were presented. At 250 Hz, significantly higher scores were observed for one phase combination (72°) compared to two of the other four relative phases. Performance on the auditory plus tactile conditions resulted in significant integrative effects and was generally more consistent with a \"Pythagorean Sum\" model than with either an \"Algebraic Sum\" or an \"Optimum Single Cannel\" model of perceptual integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":91885,"journal":{"name":"International journal of engineering technology and scientific innovation","volume":"1 2","pages":"209-229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5472392/pdf/nihms-793367.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of engineering technology and scientific innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The perceptual integration of 50- and 250-Hz, 500-ms vibrotactile and auditory tones was studied in detection experiments as a function of the relative phase (0°, 72°, 144°, 216°, and 288°) of the tone pulses. Vibrotactile stimuli were delivered through a single-channel vibrator to the left middle fingertip and auditory stimuli were presented diotically through headphones in a background of 50 dB SPL broadband noise. The observers were four adults with normal hearing. The vibrotactile and auditory stimulus levels used each yielded 63-77%-Correct unimodal detection performance in a two-interval two-alternative forced-choice task. Scores for the auditory-alone and tactile-alone conditions averaged roughly 70%-Correct. Mean scores for the auditory plus tactile conditions averaged across different phases were 77.1%-Correct at 50 Hz and 79.6%-Correct at 250 Hz. At 50 Hz, no differences in performance were observed as a function of the relative phase at which the combined auditory and tactile signals were presented. At 250 Hz, significantly higher scores were observed for one phase combination (72°) compared to two of the other four relative phases. Performance on the auditory plus tactile conditions resulted in significant integrative effects and was generally more consistent with a "Pythagorean Sum" model than with either an "Algebraic Sum" or an "Optimum Single Cannel" model of perceptual integration.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

听觉触觉整合:50和250赫兹正弦刺激相位的影响。
在检测实验中,研究了50 hz和250 hz, 500 ms振动触觉和听觉音调的感知整合作为音调脉冲相对相位(0°,72°,144°,216°和288°)的函数。在50 dB SPL宽带噪声背景下,通过单通道振动器将触觉振动刺激传递到左中指尖,听觉刺激通过耳机进行双极性呈现。观察员是四个听力正常的成年人。在两段时间的两种选择强迫选择任务中,振动触觉和听觉刺激水平分别产生了63-77%的单峰检测正确率。听觉单独和触觉单独条件下的平均得分约为70%-正确率。听觉加触觉条件在不同阶段的平均得分在50 Hz时为77.1%,在250 Hz时为79.6%。在50 Hz时,听觉和触觉信号组合呈现的相对相位没有观察到表现上的差异。在250 Hz时,一个相位组合(72°)的得分明显高于其他四个相对相位中的两个。听觉加触觉条件下的表现导致显著的整合效应,并且通常更符合“毕达哥拉斯和”模型,而不是“代数和”或“最优单通道”模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信