{"title":"An Enhanced Understanding of Therapeutic Communities Worldwide.","authors":"Nelson Jose Tiburcio, David Kressel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Therapeutic communities posit favorable treatment outcomes by relying on the community as the healing agent (Deleon 2000). Active treatment participation and treatment tenure are two domains that are positive predictors of positive treatment outcomes over time. Some of the more important domains that remain to be thoroughly investigated in international research on therapeutic community (TC) treatment outcome studies are the underlying effects of culture on the treatment process. Cultural components play a significant role, as also reported by various TC participants over the years (such as the effects of health literacy on sustaining abstinence from drug use over the long term, Tiburcio 2008). In recent years, health literacy has taken on a significant role in order for individuals to readily understand their needs (Schillinger et al 2002; Jorm et al 1997); or as pertains to feeling shamed in the process (Parikh et al 1996). As these and other studies suggest, the cultural competence of the providers is equally important. To our knowledge the \"<i>International TC Study</i>\" and findings presented herein constitute one of only a few studies that have conducted investigations comparing therapeutic community treatment modifications internationally, from the perspective of the participants themselves and which consider cultural components of this process. One key advantage of the resulting Qualitative datasets and analyses is that it not only includes residents' perspectives, and staff experiential elements, but importantly, incorporates staff debriefings about their respective interactions at each of the international treatment modalities, presenting well rounded depictions of each of these milieus. To that end, the data examined here presents an enhanced portrait of the provider-patient treatment dynamic, and lends voice to the various aspects of treatment participation in light of these cultural issues, and from the perspective of providers, as well as the participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":91960,"journal":{"name":"Revista adiccion y ciencia","volume":"1 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5473423/pdf/nihms417060.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista adiccion y ciencia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Therapeutic communities posit favorable treatment outcomes by relying on the community as the healing agent (Deleon 2000). Active treatment participation and treatment tenure are two domains that are positive predictors of positive treatment outcomes over time. Some of the more important domains that remain to be thoroughly investigated in international research on therapeutic community (TC) treatment outcome studies are the underlying effects of culture on the treatment process. Cultural components play a significant role, as also reported by various TC participants over the years (such as the effects of health literacy on sustaining abstinence from drug use over the long term, Tiburcio 2008). In recent years, health literacy has taken on a significant role in order for individuals to readily understand their needs (Schillinger et al 2002; Jorm et al 1997); or as pertains to feeling shamed in the process (Parikh et al 1996). As these and other studies suggest, the cultural competence of the providers is equally important. To our knowledge the "International TC Study" and findings presented herein constitute one of only a few studies that have conducted investigations comparing therapeutic community treatment modifications internationally, from the perspective of the participants themselves and which consider cultural components of this process. One key advantage of the resulting Qualitative datasets and analyses is that it not only includes residents' perspectives, and staff experiential elements, but importantly, incorporates staff debriefings about their respective interactions at each of the international treatment modalities, presenting well rounded depictions of each of these milieus. To that end, the data examined here presents an enhanced portrait of the provider-patient treatment dynamic, and lends voice to the various aspects of treatment participation in light of these cultural issues, and from the perspective of providers, as well as the participants.
治疗性社区通过依赖社区作为愈合剂来设想良好的治疗结果(Deleon 2000)。随着时间的推移,积极参与治疗和治疗期限是积极预测治疗结果的两个领域。在治疗社区(TC)治疗结果研究的国际研究中,一些更重要的领域仍有待深入研究,即培养对治疗过程的潜在影响。文化因素发挥着重要作用,正如多年来各种技术培训参与者所报告的那样(例如卫生知识普及对长期戒除吸毒的影响,Tiburcio 2008)。近年来,健康素养在帮助个人了解自身需求方面发挥了重要作用(Schillinger et al . 2002;Jorm et al . 1997);或者在这个过程中感到羞耻(Parikh et al 1996)。正如这些和其他研究表明的那样,提供者的文化能力同样重要。据我们所知,“国际TC研究”和本文提出的研究结果是为数不多的研究之一,这些研究从参与者自己的角度进行了调查,比较了国际上的治疗社区治疗修改,并考虑了这一过程的文化因素。由此产生的定性数据集和分析的一个关键优势是,它不仅包括住院医生的观点和工作人员的经验元素,而且重要的是,它包含了工作人员对他们各自在每种国际治疗模式中的互动情况的汇报,对每种环境进行了全面的描述。为此,本文研究的数据展示了提供者-患者治疗动态的增强画像,并根据这些文化问题,从提供者和参与者的角度,为治疗参与的各个方面提供了声音。