Transferring embryos with indeterminate PGD results: the ethical implications.

Fertility research and practice Pub Date : 2016-02-01 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40738-016-0014-9
Iris G Insogna, Elizabeth Ginsburg
{"title":"Transferring embryos with indeterminate PGD results: the ethical implications.","authors":"Iris G Insogna,&nbsp;Elizabeth Ginsburg","doi":"10.1186/s40738-016-0014-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In vitro fertilization (IVF) and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) are becoming increasingly common techniques to select embryos that are unaffected by a known genetic disorder. Though IVF-PGD has high success rates, 7.5 % of blastocysts have inconclusive results after testing. A recent case involving a known BRCA-1 carrier was brought before our Assisted Reproductive Technology Ethics Committee in order to gain a better appreciation for the ethical implications surrounding the transfer of embryos with indeterminate testing.</p><p><strong>The case presentation: </strong>Thirty-nine year old G0 BRCA-1 carrier requiring IVF for male factor infertility. The couple elected for PGD to select against BRCA-1 gene carrier embryos. However, several embryos were returned with inconclusive results. The couple wished to proceed with the transfer of embryos with an unknown carrier status. The case was presented before our Assisted Reproductive Technology Ethics Committee.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many considerations were explored, including the physician's duty to protect patient autonomy, the physician's duty to act in the best interest of the future child, and the physician's duty towards society. Transferring both embryos with unknown carrier status and known-carrier status was debated. Ultimately, the transfer of inconclusive embryos was felt to be ethically permissible in most cases if patients had been adequately counseled. However, the re-biopsy of embryos with inconclusive testing results was encouraged. The transfer of known-carrier embryos was felt to be unethical for certain disease-states, depending on the severity of illness and timing of disease onset. We strongly encourage physicians to create an action plan in advance with their patients, prior to testing, in the event that embryos are returned with inconclusive PGD results. The committee's decision, though helpful in guiding practice, should not overshadow the individual physician-patient relationship, and the need for thorough counseling.</p>","PeriodicalId":87254,"journal":{"name":"Fertility research and practice","volume":"2 ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40738-016-0014-9","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-016-0014-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: In vitro fertilization (IVF) and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) are becoming increasingly common techniques to select embryos that are unaffected by a known genetic disorder. Though IVF-PGD has high success rates, 7.5 % of blastocysts have inconclusive results after testing. A recent case involving a known BRCA-1 carrier was brought before our Assisted Reproductive Technology Ethics Committee in order to gain a better appreciation for the ethical implications surrounding the transfer of embryos with indeterminate testing.

The case presentation: Thirty-nine year old G0 BRCA-1 carrier requiring IVF for male factor infertility. The couple elected for PGD to select against BRCA-1 gene carrier embryos. However, several embryos were returned with inconclusive results. The couple wished to proceed with the transfer of embryos with an unknown carrier status. The case was presented before our Assisted Reproductive Technology Ethics Committee.

Conclusion: Many considerations were explored, including the physician's duty to protect patient autonomy, the physician's duty to act in the best interest of the future child, and the physician's duty towards society. Transferring both embryos with unknown carrier status and known-carrier status was debated. Ultimately, the transfer of inconclusive embryos was felt to be ethically permissible in most cases if patients had been adequately counseled. However, the re-biopsy of embryos with inconclusive testing results was encouraged. The transfer of known-carrier embryos was felt to be unethical for certain disease-states, depending on the severity of illness and timing of disease onset. We strongly encourage physicians to create an action plan in advance with their patients, prior to testing, in the event that embryos are returned with inconclusive PGD results. The committee's decision, though helpful in guiding practice, should not overshadow the individual physician-patient relationship, and the need for thorough counseling.

移植PGD结果不确定的胚胎:伦理意义。
背景:体外受精(IVF)和植入前遗传学诊断(PGD)正在成为越来越普遍的技术,以选择不受已知遗传疾病影响的胚胎。尽管IVF-PGD成功率很高,但7.5%的囊胚在检测后结果不确定。最近的一个病例涉及一个已知的BRCA-1携带者,我们将其提交给辅助生殖技术伦理委员会,以便更好地了解不确定检测胚胎移植的伦理影响。病例介绍:39岁,G0 BRCA-1携带者,因男性因素不孕需要体外受精。这对夫妇选择PGD来选择反对BRCA-1基因携带者的胚胎。然而,几个胚胎被送回,结果不确定。这对夫妇希望继续进行携带状态未知的胚胎移植。该案例已提交给我们的辅助生殖技术伦理委员会。结论:探讨了许多考虑因素,包括医生保护患者自主权的义务,医生为未来儿童的最佳利益行事的义务,以及医生对社会的义务。未知载体状态和已知载体状态的胚胎移植存在争议。最终,在大多数情况下,如果患者得到充分的咨询,移植不确定的胚胎在伦理上是允许的。然而,如果检测结果不确定,则鼓励对胚胎进行重新活检。根据疾病的严重程度和发病时间,对某些疾病状态移植已知载体胚胎被认为是不道德的。我们强烈建议医生在测试之前与患者一起制定行动计划,以防胚胎返回时PGD结果不确定。委员会的决定,虽然有助于指导实践,但不应掩盖个人医患关系,以及彻底咨询的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信