Mental Health Insurance Parity and Provider Wages.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Ezra Golberstein, Susan H Busch
{"title":"Mental Health Insurance Parity and Provider Wages.","authors":"Ezra Golberstein,&nbsp;Susan H Busch","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Policymakers frequently mandate that employers or insurers provide insurance benefits deemed to be critical to individuals' well-being. However, in the presence of private market imperfections, mandates that increase demand for a service can lead to price increases for that service, without necessarily affecting the quantity being supplied. We test this idea empirically by looking at mental health parity mandates.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated whether implementation of parity laws was associated with changes in mental health provider wages.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Quasi-experimental analysis of average wages by state and year for six mental health care-related occupations were considered: Clinical, Counseling, and School Psychologists; Substance Abuse and Behavioral Disorder Counselors; Marriage and Family Therapists; Mental Health Counselors; Mental Health and Substance Abuse Social Workers; and Psychiatrists. Data from 1999-2013 were used to estimate the association between the implementation of state mental health parity laws and the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act and average mental health provider wages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mental health parity laws were associated with a significant increase in mental health care provider wages controlling for changes in mental health provider wages in states not exposed to parity (3.5 percent [95% CI: 0.3%, 6.6%]; p<.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Mental health parity laws were associated with statistically significant but modest increases in mental health provider wages.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Health insurance benefit expansions may lead to increased prices for health services when the private market that supplies the service is imperfect or constrained. In the context of mental health parity, this work suggests that part of the value of expanding insurance benefits for mental health coverage was captured by providers. Given historically low wage levels of mental health providers, this increase may be a first step in bringing mental health provider wages in line with parallel health professions, potentially reducing turnover rates and improving treatment quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":46381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","volume":"20 2","pages":"75-82"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Policymakers frequently mandate that employers or insurers provide insurance benefits deemed to be critical to individuals' well-being. However, in the presence of private market imperfections, mandates that increase demand for a service can lead to price increases for that service, without necessarily affecting the quantity being supplied. We test this idea empirically by looking at mental health parity mandates.

Objective: This study evaluated whether implementation of parity laws was associated with changes in mental health provider wages.

Method: Quasi-experimental analysis of average wages by state and year for six mental health care-related occupations were considered: Clinical, Counseling, and School Psychologists; Substance Abuse and Behavioral Disorder Counselors; Marriage and Family Therapists; Mental Health Counselors; Mental Health and Substance Abuse Social Workers; and Psychiatrists. Data from 1999-2013 were used to estimate the association between the implementation of state mental health parity laws and the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act and average mental health provider wages.

Results: Mental health parity laws were associated with a significant increase in mental health care provider wages controlling for changes in mental health provider wages in states not exposed to parity (3.5 percent [95% CI: 0.3%, 6.6%]; p<.05).

Discussion: Mental health parity laws were associated with statistically significant but modest increases in mental health provider wages.

Implications: Health insurance benefit expansions may lead to increased prices for health services when the private market that supplies the service is imperfect or constrained. In the context of mental health parity, this work suggests that part of the value of expanding insurance benefits for mental health coverage was captured by providers. Given historically low wage levels of mental health providers, this increase may be a first step in bringing mental health provider wages in line with parallel health professions, potentially reducing turnover rates and improving treatment quality.

精神健康保险平价和提供者工资。
背景:政策制定者经常要求雇主或保险公司提供对个人福祉至关重要的保险福利。然而,在私人市场不完善的情况下,增加对一项服务的需求的命令可能导致该服务的价格上涨,而不一定影响供给量。我们通过观察心理健康平等授权来检验这一观点。目的:本研究评估平价法律的实施是否与精神卫生服务提供者工资的变化有关。方法:采用准实验分析方法,对临床、心理咨询和学校心理咨询师等六种与心理卫生保健相关的职业按州和年度进行平均工资分析;药物滥用和行为障碍辅导员;婚姻及家庭治疗师;心理健康咨询师;心理健康和药物滥用社会工作者;和精神病学家。1999年至2013年的数据被用来估计州精神健康平等法的实施与保罗·威尔斯通和皮特·多梅尼奇精神健康平等和成瘾平等法案以及精神健康提供者平均工资之间的关系。结果:精神卫生均等法与精神卫生保健提供者工资的显著增加有关,控制了未暴露于均等的州精神卫生保健提供者工资的变化(3.5% [95% CI: 0.3%, 6.6%];讨论:心理健康平等法与心理健康提供者工资的统计显著但适度增长有关。含义:当提供医疗服务的私人市场不完善或受到限制时,医疗保险福利的扩大可能导致医疗服务价格上涨。在精神健康平等的背景下,这项工作表明,扩大精神健康保险福利的部分价值被提供者获取。鉴于精神卫生服务提供者的工资水平历来较低,这一增加可能是使精神卫生服务提供者的工资与平行的卫生专业人员保持一致的第一步,可能会降低离职率并提高治疗质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics publishes high quality empirical, analytical and methodologic papers focusing on the application of health and economic research and policy analysis in mental health. It offers an international forum to enable the different participants in mental health policy and economics - psychiatrists involved in research and care and other mental health workers, health services researchers, health economists, policy makers, public and private health providers, advocacy groups, and the pharmaceutical industry - to share common information in a common language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信