A Conceptual Framework for Barriers to the Recruitment and Retention of Rural CVD Participants in Behavior Intervention Trials.

GSTF journal of nursing and health care Pub Date : 2015-08-01 Epub Date: 2015-09-24 DOI:10.5176/2010-4804_2.2.71
Lufei Young, Melody Montgomery, Sue Barnason, Cindy Schmidt, Van Do
{"title":"A Conceptual Framework for Barriers to the Recruitment and Retention of Rural CVD Participants in Behavior Intervention Trials.","authors":"Lufei Young,&nbsp;Melody Montgomery,&nbsp;Sue Barnason,&nbsp;Cindy Schmidt,&nbsp;Van Do","doi":"10.5176/2010-4804_2.2.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rural residents diagnosed with cardiovascular disease (CVD) or with CVD-related risks are underrepresented in behavioral intervention trials based on an extensive review of published studies. The low participation rate of rural residents weakens both the internal and external validity of published studies. Moreover, compared to urban residents, limited research exists to describe the unique barriers that limit the participation of rural residents in behavioral intervention trials.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this review is to identify a conceptual framework (CF) underpinning common barriers faced by rural CVD patients to enroll in behavioral intervention trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a literature review using several electronic databases to obtain a representative sample of research articles, synthesized the evidence, and developed a CF to explain the barriers that may affect the research participation rate of rural residents with CVD or related risks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found our evidence-based CF well explained the barriers for rural CVD patients to take part in behavioral intervention trials. Besides contextual factors (i.e. patient, community and research levels), other common factors impacting rural patients' intent to enroll are lack of awareness and understanding about behavioral trials, limited support from their healthcare providers and social circles, unfavorable attitudes, and the lack of opportunity to participating research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and implication of result: </strong>The findings demonstrate the evidence-based model consisting of interlinked multi-level factors may help our understanding of the barriers encountered by rural CVD patients participating interventions to promote behavioral change. The implication for researchers is that identifying and developing strategies to overcome the barriers precedes conducting studies in rural communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":91870,"journal":{"name":"GSTF journal of nursing and health care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5451106/pdf/nihms827967.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GSTF journal of nursing and health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5176/2010-4804_2.2.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: Rural residents diagnosed with cardiovascular disease (CVD) or with CVD-related risks are underrepresented in behavioral intervention trials based on an extensive review of published studies. The low participation rate of rural residents weakens both the internal and external validity of published studies. Moreover, compared to urban residents, limited research exists to describe the unique barriers that limit the participation of rural residents in behavioral intervention trials.

Objective: The purpose of this review is to identify a conceptual framework (CF) underpinning common barriers faced by rural CVD patients to enroll in behavioral intervention trials.

Methods: We conducted a literature review using several electronic databases to obtain a representative sample of research articles, synthesized the evidence, and developed a CF to explain the barriers that may affect the research participation rate of rural residents with CVD or related risks.

Results: We found our evidence-based CF well explained the barriers for rural CVD patients to take part in behavioral intervention trials. Besides contextual factors (i.e. patient, community and research levels), other common factors impacting rural patients' intent to enroll are lack of awareness and understanding about behavioral trials, limited support from their healthcare providers and social circles, unfavorable attitudes, and the lack of opportunity to participating research.

Conclusion and implication of result: The findings demonstrate the evidence-based model consisting of interlinked multi-level factors may help our understanding of the barriers encountered by rural CVD patients participating interventions to promote behavioral change. The implication for researchers is that identifying and developing strategies to overcome the barriers precedes conducting studies in rural communities.

行为干预试验中农村心血管疾病参与者招募和保留障碍的概念框架。
背景:基于对已发表研究的广泛回顾,在行为干预试验中,被诊断为心血管疾病(CVD)或有CVD相关风险的农村居民的代表性不足。农村居民的低参与率削弱了已发表研究的内部效度和外部效度。此外,与城市居民相比,关于限制农村居民参与行为干预试验的独特障碍的研究有限。目的:本综述的目的是确定一个概念框架(CF),支持农村心血管疾病患者参加行为干预试验时面临的常见障碍。方法:利用多个电子数据库进行文献综述,获得具有代表性的研究文章样本,综合证据,并制定CF来解释可能影响农村心血管疾病或相关风险居民研究参与率的障碍。结果:我们发现我们的循证CF很好地解释了农村心血管疾病患者参加行为干预试验的障碍。除了环境因素(即患者、社区和研究水平)外,影响农村患者入组意向的其他常见因素包括缺乏对行为试验的认识和理解、卫生保健提供者和社交圈的支持有限、不利的态度以及缺乏参与研究的机会。结论及结果含义:本研究结果表明,由相互关联的多层次因素组成的循证模型有助于我们理解农村心血管疾病患者参与促进行为改变干预所遇到的障碍。对研究人员来说,这意味着在农村社区开展研究之前,要确定和制定克服障碍的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信