Is the Fight against Doping in Sport a Legal Minefield like Any Other?

Medicine and sport science Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-06-01 DOI:10.1159/000460682
Ulrich Haas
{"title":"Is the Fight against Doping in Sport a Legal Minefield like Any Other?","authors":"Ulrich Haas","doi":"10.1159/000460682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the fight against doping, creating a level playing field across all sports is very challenging from a legal perspective. A harmonized approach presupposes first and foremost a supreme regulatory authority on a global level. This task cannot be attributed to the public sector, because there is no supranational authority of public international law capable of dealing with it. Thus, responsibility has to be assumed by a private law entity. This in turn requires complicated contractual agreements by which duties and responsibilities are transferred from the individual to the national level and from there to the top of the pyramid. In practice, this process is not only difficult and cumbersome, it also leads to an accumulation of power at the top of the sports pyramid that must be contained by organizational checks and balances, such as access to justice and the rule of law, accountability, transparency, and possibilities for the respective stakeholders to partake in the decision-making process. The weighting of all these different aspects is demanding and further complicated by the regulatory reach of the various national lawmakers. Since national laws differ considerably and a harmonized legislative approach is nowhere near in sight, a global approach in the fight against doping must push back national laws and legal concepts as much as possible. The purpose of this chapter is to give an overview on all these legal challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":18475,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and sport science","volume":"62 ","pages":"22-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000460682","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000460682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the fight against doping, creating a level playing field across all sports is very challenging from a legal perspective. A harmonized approach presupposes first and foremost a supreme regulatory authority on a global level. This task cannot be attributed to the public sector, because there is no supranational authority of public international law capable of dealing with it. Thus, responsibility has to be assumed by a private law entity. This in turn requires complicated contractual agreements by which duties and responsibilities are transferred from the individual to the national level and from there to the top of the pyramid. In practice, this process is not only difficult and cumbersome, it also leads to an accumulation of power at the top of the sports pyramid that must be contained by organizational checks and balances, such as access to justice and the rule of law, accountability, transparency, and possibilities for the respective stakeholders to partake in the decision-making process. The weighting of all these different aspects is demanding and further complicated by the regulatory reach of the various national lawmakers. Since national laws differ considerably and a harmonized legislative approach is nowhere near in sight, a global approach in the fight against doping must push back national laws and legal concepts as much as possible. The purpose of this chapter is to give an overview on all these legal challenges.

反兴奋剂运动是一个法律雷区吗?
在反兴奋剂的斗争中,从法律的角度来看,在所有体育项目中创造一个公平的竞争环境是非常具有挑战性的。一种协调一致的方法首先以全球一级的最高监管机构为前提。这项任务不能归咎于公共部门,因为没有任何超国家的国际公法权威能够处理这项任务。因此,责任必须由私法实体承担。这反过来又需要复杂的合同协议,通过这些协议,义务和责任从个人转移到国家层面,再从国家层面转移到金字塔的顶端。在实践中,这一过程不仅困难和繁琐,而且还导致体育金字塔顶端的权力积累,必须通过组织制衡来遏制,例如诉诸司法和法治,问责制,透明度以及各自利益相关者参与决策过程的可能性。所有这些不同方面的权重都是苛刻的,并且由于各国立法者的监管范围而进一步复杂化。由于各国的法律差异很大,统一的立法方法遥遥可见,因此,在反兴奋剂斗争中采取全球性的方法必须尽可能地推迟各国的法律和法律概念。本章的目的是概述所有这些法律挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信