Sport, Society, and Anti-Doping Policy: An Ethical Overview.

Medicine and sport science Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-06-01 DOI:10.1159/000460748
Andrew J Bloodworth, Mike McNamee
{"title":"Sport, Society, and Anti-Doping Policy: An Ethical Overview.","authors":"Andrew J Bloodworth,&nbsp;Mike McNamee","doi":"10.1159/000460748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this chapter is to provide an overview of the philosophical and ethical underpinnings of anti-doping policy. The nature of sport and its gratuitous logic is explored. The doping rules in sport, such as the Prohibited List, are ways of drawing a line to facilitate a certain sort of competition. Sports can be understood as a means of testing the natural physical abilities of the athlete, combined with the hard work they put into improving their performance. A test promoted by the anti-doping laws. Permitting certain forms of performance enhancement would threaten the special nature of such a test. Doping can be seen as a threat to the integrity of sport, not just because of the rule breaking doping currently entails. The chapter explores the ethical issues that arise with such forms of enhancement, such as fairness, harms to health, and indeed a refusal to accept human limitations. Finally, the criteria upon which a substance or method may be prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) is addressed. The 3-part criteria, concerning (1) enhancement, (2) health, and (3) the spirit of sport are described, and literature that takes a critical line is addressed. Particular reference is made to the public health agenda explicit within anti-doping policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18475,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and sport science","volume":"62 ","pages":"177-185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000460748","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000460748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to provide an overview of the philosophical and ethical underpinnings of anti-doping policy. The nature of sport and its gratuitous logic is explored. The doping rules in sport, such as the Prohibited List, are ways of drawing a line to facilitate a certain sort of competition. Sports can be understood as a means of testing the natural physical abilities of the athlete, combined with the hard work they put into improving their performance. A test promoted by the anti-doping laws. Permitting certain forms of performance enhancement would threaten the special nature of such a test. Doping can be seen as a threat to the integrity of sport, not just because of the rule breaking doping currently entails. The chapter explores the ethical issues that arise with such forms of enhancement, such as fairness, harms to health, and indeed a refusal to accept human limitations. Finally, the criteria upon which a substance or method may be prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) is addressed. The 3-part criteria, concerning (1) enhancement, (2) health, and (3) the spirit of sport are described, and literature that takes a critical line is addressed. Particular reference is made to the public health agenda explicit within anti-doping policy.

体育、社会和反兴奋剂政策:伦理综述。
本章的目的是概述反兴奋剂政策的哲学和伦理基础。探讨了体育运动的本质及其无端逻辑。体育运动中的兴奋剂规则,如禁赛名单,是为促进某种类型的竞争划定界限的方式。体育运动可以被理解为一种测试运动员天生身体能力的手段,并结合他们为提高成绩所付出的努力。一项由反兴奋剂法推动的测试。允许某些形式的性能提高将威胁到这种测试的特殊性。兴奋剂可以被视为对体育诚信的威胁,不仅仅是因为兴奋剂目前带来的违规行为。这一章探讨了这种形式的增强所产生的伦理问题,如公平、对健康的危害,以及拒绝接受人类的局限性。最后,讨论了世界反兴奋剂机构(WADA)可能禁止的物质或方法的标准。描述了关于(1)增强,(2)健康和(3)体育精神的三部分标准,并讨论了采取关键路线的文献。特别提到了反兴奋剂政策中明确的公共卫生议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信