Diversifying the STEM pipeline.

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Christina Boelter, Tanja C Link, Brea L Perry, Carl Leukefeld
{"title":"Diversifying the STEM pipeline.","authors":"Christina Boelter,&nbsp;Tanja C Link,&nbsp;Brea L Perry,&nbsp;Carl Leukefeld","doi":"10.1080/10824669.2015.1030077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The current paper focuses on the description and evaluation of a two-year STEM intervention targeting underserved middle schools students from minority and low SES backgrounds.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>Middle school students from low-income and minority backgrounds (n = 166) were targeted to participate in a two-year, intensive, hands-on science and technology intervention to increase their interest in biomedical and health sciences. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from TRY-IT! Students as well as a control group that did not participate in the intervention, teachers, and parents to assess changes in attitudes and knowledge with respect to a variety of STEM-related topics.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Quantitative analyses did not reveal significant long-lasting differences between the TRY-IT! and the control group, thus providing a mixed assessment of the effectiveness of the intervention. However, qualitative student responses collected during the second year of participation revealed positive attitudes toward the program experience and benefits of their exposure to science. In light of these findings, insights drawn from reflecting on successes and challenges experienced during the course of planning and implementing the study are provided to guide future programs and research.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>The intervention was developed in response to the continued under representation of minority and lower SES individuals in STEM careers. An effort to boost positive attitudes toward science and math, as well as confidence in the accessibility of STEM careers among this population is important given the promising outlook of this career field compared to others for future generations.</p>","PeriodicalId":46222,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk","volume":"20 3","pages":"218-237"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10824669.2015.1030077","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2015.1030077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Purpose: The current paper focuses on the description and evaluation of a two-year STEM intervention targeting underserved middle schools students from minority and low SES backgrounds.

Design/methodology/approach: Middle school students from low-income and minority backgrounds (n = 166) were targeted to participate in a two-year, intensive, hands-on science and technology intervention to increase their interest in biomedical and health sciences. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from TRY-IT! Students as well as a control group that did not participate in the intervention, teachers, and parents to assess changes in attitudes and knowledge with respect to a variety of STEM-related topics.

Findings: Quantitative analyses did not reveal significant long-lasting differences between the TRY-IT! and the control group, thus providing a mixed assessment of the effectiveness of the intervention. However, qualitative student responses collected during the second year of participation revealed positive attitudes toward the program experience and benefits of their exposure to science. In light of these findings, insights drawn from reflecting on successes and challenges experienced during the course of planning and implementing the study are provided to guide future programs and research.

Originality/value: The intervention was developed in response to the continued under representation of minority and lower SES individuals in STEM careers. An effort to boost positive attitudes toward science and math, as well as confidence in the accessibility of STEM careers among this population is important given the promising outlook of this career field compared to others for future generations.

多样化STEM管道。
目的:本研究主要对一项为期两年的针对少数民族和低社会经济地位背景中学生的STEM干预进行描述和评估。设计/方法/方法:来自低收入和少数民族背景的中学生(n = 166)参加了为期两年的强化实践科学和技术干预,以提高他们对生物医学和健康科学的兴趣。定量和定性数据收集自TRY-IT!学生以及没有参与干预的对照组、教师和家长评估他们对各种stem相关主题的态度和知识的变化。结果:定量分析没有显示TRY-IT!和对照组,从而对干预的有效性提供了一个混合评估。然而,在参与第二年收集的定性学生回答显示出对项目经验和他们接触科学的好处的积极态度。根据这些发现,从规划和实施研究过程中所经历的成功和挑战的反思中得出的见解为指导未来的计划和研究提供了指导。独创性/价值:该干预措施是针对STEM职业中少数民族和低社会经济地位个体的持续代表性不足而开发的。考虑到这一职业领域与其他领域相比,对未来几代人来说前景光明,努力提高对科学和数学的积极态度,以及对STEM职业在这一人群中的可及性的信心是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信