Sinonasal Characteristics in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Compared to Healthy Controls.

International Journal of Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-05-04 DOI:10.1155/2017/1935284
Mads Henrik Strand Moxness, Vegard Bugten, Wenche Moe Thorstensen, Ståle Nordgård
{"title":"Sinonasal Characteristics in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Compared to Healthy Controls.","authors":"Mads Henrik Strand Moxness,&nbsp;Vegard Bugten,&nbsp;Wenche Moe Thorstensen,&nbsp;Ståle Nordgård","doi":"10.1155/2017/1935284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>. The difference in nasal obstruction between OSA patients and healthy individuals is not adequately documented. Our aim was to describe the sinonasal quality of life and nasal function in OSA patients and healthy controls using the sinonasal outcome test-20 (SNOT-20), nasal obstruction visual analog scale (NO-VAS), and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF). <i>Methodology and Principal</i>. Ninety-three OSA patients and 92 controls were included in a case-control study from 2010 to 2015. <i>Results</i>. Mean SNOT-20 score in the OSA group was 1.69 (SD 0.84) compared to 0.55 (SD 0.69) in controls (<i>p</i> < 0.001, 95% CI [0.9, 1.4]). The mean NO-VAS score was 41.3 (SD 12.8) and 14.7 (SD 14.4) in the OSA group and controls, respectively, (<i>p</i> < 0.001, 95% CI [22.7, 30.6]). PNIF measured 105 litres/minute in the OSA group and 117 litres/minute in controls (<i>p</i> < 0.01, 95% CI [-21.8, -3.71]). There was a positive correlation between subjective nasal obstruction and change in PNIF after decongestion in the control group alone. <i>Conclusions</i>. OSA patients have a reduced sinonasal QoL and lower peak nasal inspiratory flow compared to controls. Treatment of nasal obstruction in OSA patients should be made a priority along with treatment of the ailment itself.</p>","PeriodicalId":32361,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"2017 ","pages":"1935284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/1935284","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1935284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/5/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background. The difference in nasal obstruction between OSA patients and healthy individuals is not adequately documented. Our aim was to describe the sinonasal quality of life and nasal function in OSA patients and healthy controls using the sinonasal outcome test-20 (SNOT-20), nasal obstruction visual analog scale (NO-VAS), and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF). Methodology and Principal. Ninety-three OSA patients and 92 controls were included in a case-control study from 2010 to 2015. Results. Mean SNOT-20 score in the OSA group was 1.69 (SD 0.84) compared to 0.55 (SD 0.69) in controls (p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.9, 1.4]). The mean NO-VAS score was 41.3 (SD 12.8) and 14.7 (SD 14.4) in the OSA group and controls, respectively, (p < 0.001, 95% CI [22.7, 30.6]). PNIF measured 105 litres/minute in the OSA group and 117 litres/minute in controls (p < 0.01, 95% CI [-21.8, -3.71]). There was a positive correlation between subjective nasal obstruction and change in PNIF after decongestion in the control group alone. Conclusions. OSA patients have a reduced sinonasal QoL and lower peak nasal inspiratory flow compared to controls. Treatment of nasal obstruction in OSA patients should be made a priority along with treatment of the ailment itself.

Abstract Image

阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者与健康对照组的鼻窦特征比较
背景。阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者与健康个体之间鼻塞的差异并没有充分的文献记载。我们的目的是通过鼻窦结局测试-20 (SNOT-20)、鼻塞视觉模拟量表(NO-VAS)和鼻吸入流量峰值(PNIF)来描述OSA患者和健康对照者的鼻窦生活质量和鼻功能。方法和原则。2010年至2015年,93名OSA患者和92名对照组纳入病例对照研究。结果。OSA组SNOT-20平均评分为1.69 (SD 0.84),对照组为0.55 (SD 0.69) (p < 0.001, 95% CI[0.9, 1.4])。OSA组和对照组的平均NO-VAS评分分别为41.3 (SD 12.8)和14.7 (SD 14.4),差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001, 95% CI[22.7, 30.6])。OSA组PNIF为105升/分钟,对照组为117升/分钟(p < 0.01, 95% CI[-21.8, -3.71])。单独对照组主观鼻塞与去充血后PNIF变化呈正相关。结论。与对照组相比,OSA患者鼻窦生活质量降低,鼻吸入流量峰值降低。阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的鼻塞治疗应与疾病本身的治疗一起优先考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信